Part 40 (1/2)

Iben tries to catch Anne-Lises expression. How are things?

Just fine. Really. Fine. What about you?

Oh, fine.

Anne-Lise hesitates for a moment. You know, Im actually feeling happy.

Iben nods toward the papers on the desk. Whats all that about?

I have to sort out the keywords for this pile of new books.

Iben yawns. I guess Id better get to work too.

Anne-Lise says, Yes. Then she uses one of Malenes phrases: Wed better be good.

When Iben sits down at her desk, Paul has left, and Malene leans across her desk as far as she can and whispers: We need to talk.

They go off together to the small meeting room. Iben emphasizes how it would have been so much better not to have been forced to disagree in front of the others. Malene apologizes for this, and for her words on the phone. Because Paul is at the Center they cant spend too much time away from their desks, but they promise each other to have a longer talk later.

Iben needs to work on the Turkey issue. However, as things stand, it would probably be best to avoid Anne-Lise for a while. She sends an e-mail to her instead, saying that shes sure their planned discussion will generate all sorts of exciting ideas, but that she would like to postpone it for a couple of days.

Anne-Lise has enough understanding of what is going on and e-mails back a simple Fine by me.

Iben turns to Malene and suggests that they work on the delegates handouts for the conference about the ethnic cleansing of East European Germans between 1945 and 1950. Iben goes to sit next to Malene so that they can go over her draft together. Iben, who has brought her mug of coffee along, takes a sip and starts scanning Malenes text.

The heading strikes her as being in poor taste: Welcome to the International Conference on Ethnic Cleansing of Germans 194550.

Reading on, the very first sentence also seems odd and inappropriate given the subject matter. The next sentence sounds so heavy you just want to run away. She turns to the next page. Its no good either. Then she abandons the second page too. This is hopeless.

Iben tries to recall what she thought of Malenes previous draft. As far as she can remember, it seemed all right. Why does it look so different now? What can she say?

She tries to find something positive before she starts to criticize it.

Iben looks up and sees her best friend watching her. Does Malene sense how Iben feels about their friends.h.i.+p today? Probably not. For the last few months Iben has felt uneasy about it, but Malene appears not to have noticed. But then, why should she? Its not as if Iben has actually said anything.

Luckily, Iben finds something on the last page of the conference papers that works. Now she can praise it with sincerity.

Malene, I really like this pa.s.sage at the end. Its so inviting. Friendly.

I did try to write as if I were writing to a friend.

They smile.

Iben is back at her own desk, preparing to review a new book about Yugoslavia for the the DCIG Web site, but once again she has trouble concentrating.

She creates a new file for notes to herself. Her comments might be part of the groundwork for another article in her series on the psychology of evil.

At least now shes not wasting her time at work. Besides, its the only subject she can focus on.

EVIL, PSYCHOL III.

Just about everyone must have heard a friend praising her great relations.h.i.+p with a lover only to say, soon after breaking up, that she knew from the start that it wouldnt last. She will insist she knew, even when they had bought an apartment or had a child together.

The interesting point is the friends claim to have known all along while acting as if she did not. This might be something to bear in mind when trying to understand people who have committed terrible acts that they at other times in their life have claimed they could never possibly commit. It could be that we should stop trying to see every human being as a consistent whole. A better image of the human psyche might be a bunch of grapes: each grape is a set of characteristics, worldviews, and moral codes. Subconsciously, we pick one grape or another at different times.

Without being an actual clinical case of split personality, individuals are simultaneously able to hold contradictory beliefs, each one developed and honed by years of experience. This, despite the person being aware of only one state of mind at a time.

Iben adds an NB: Is this too early to insert references to research into DID? Do I have any other examples to base this argument on? There must be something but where?

This interpretation of how people function could explain, for instance, why many Serbian schoolteachers in Bosnia were able to take an active part in the killing of their pupils and their pupils parents. Parents who survived in most cases declared themselves unable to grasp how the teacher could bring himself to do what he had done. He had always seemed to be very caring toward the pupils. The only explanation seemed to be that he had been lying to them for years.

But he didnt lie. When the war started, he moved to another grape in his bunch. And when the war ended, he went back to the old one. This movement might explain why so many war criminals are without remorse. They resume their prewar life, and everything concerning their actions in the war is hazy. They feel as if it was someone else who went wild, killing innocent children and adults.

Another NB: Do I lack a good lead-in here? Maybe the next bit should be a different article? Or The Psychology of Evil IV? Its at this point that the perspectives open out.

In G.o.d, Gulliver, and Genocide, the author Claude Rawson (professor of English at Yale) has a.n.a.lyzed Hitlers prewar speeches. They are very vague on the subject of what should be done about the Jews. Should they be deported to Madagascar, or some other course of action? Superficially, the Germans were unsure what it was that Hitler wanted and yet, at the same time, they knew. Hitler was able to obfuscate the appalling implications of his policy while making its advantages crystal clear to non-Jewish German citizens.

Similar patterns can be observed in the Rwandan radio broadcasts and the propaganda aimed at German soldiers. No one utters the words kill or murder outright. But everyone knows what is really going on, and the underlying message is clear beneath all the vague and circuitous language that dehumanizes the victims. Expressions such as exterminating the vermin or cleaning up a village allow propagandists to consign the very real suffering of the victims to a partly unconscious mind grape.

An important avenue for future research might be to examine if this obscurity of language in the days leading up to genocide is something more than linguistic. Usage might reflect the dynamics of a central psychological mechanism that is essential to the catastrophic final result. Could it be that genocide simply would not happen without a critical ma.s.s of indistinct expressions to support a convenient distribution of mental processes into appropriate grapes? That is, the process culminating in genocide depends on the coordination of several perceptions at the same time on parallel thinking along multiple lines rather than the single-mindedness we usually believe to be the rule in making life decisions.

Such research could also tell us about the way people think and arrive at their decisions more generally not just in the realm of genocide.

Iben leans back in her chair. She feels much better now. There is no telling if this piece will ever be published in the magazine, but at least its safely stored away in the computer.

Malene is staring at her screen and Paul is wandering around their office again. It seems he has decided he should show his face more often and chat to his staff. He wants to be inspiring and supportive, but he does have a tendency to pick the wrong moments.

During lunch he asks Iben what she has been reading recently. Of course, he means articles relevant to her work at the DCIG, but she cant resist mentioning the clinical texts about DID again and tells him about the embryonic article she has just written. After a while she stops, suddenly feeling self-conscious about talking for too long.

But Paul is appreciative. Fantastic! I mean it, Iben! Thats just the kind of discussion we should be having. Its wonderful for you to explore entirely new lines of thought.

He follows up his comments with a series of criticisms, but constructive ones. His aim is to clarify the bunch-of-grapes hypothesis. How well does it fit actual facts? What are the possible applications?

When the break is over, he asks Iben to join him in his office. This makes Iben nervous. Paul sits down and gestures for her to sit opposite him. As he leans back on his chair, she notes that he is growing a small potbelly. The door to the Winter Garden is open behind her. It cant be anything serious or he would have closed the door, she tells herself.

Look, I hate to say it, but I believe that Robert Jay Lifton has already written something similar to what youre proposing in his book The n.a.z.i Doctors.

Iben smiles happily. Clearly all Paul wanted was to carry on talking.

In it Lifton introduces a concept he calls doubling to describe what happened in the minds of doctors who would spend their days doing experiments involving the torture and mutilation of living human beings, and then go home after work and behave normally, playing with their children and so on.

Iben is familiar with this. But Paul, Liftons theory of doubling is different. It states that under pressure of the special conditions in concentration camps, the doctors developed just one separate personality. And this other was independent of their normal selves, which made them perfectly capable of immersing people in boiling water Her voice grows louder than it probably should in a conversation with her boss.

What Ive tried to figure out is if the situation is more complex than just the splitting of a personality. You see, my grapes are not mental strategies created under pressure. They already exist inside all of us.

Paul doesnt reply. He puts his hands behind his head and then removes them again. Iben is afraid that she has said something wrong.