Part 277 (2/2)

--_Participle_, defined

--_Participles_, whether they ought to be called verbs, --appropriate _na_ of the kinds of, --often become adjectives, --beco to the verb, --number of, simp and comp, --imply _ti of their verbs, but differ fro, from what derived, --H TOOKE'S view of the time of; hom BROWN differs

--_Participles_, Classes of, named and defined, --(See _Irammarians differ in their opinion with respect to the time and voice of, --how have been called and treated by souished froantly taken as plur nouns, (”_All his_ REDEEMED,”) --appar used for adverbs, --some beco ”one na the poss_, whence the doctrine; PRIESTL criticised; MURR _et al_ adopt PRIESTL doctrine, which they badly sustain; teachers of do disagree aenerally disposes of; how deterovernular synt of, twofold; nature of the two constructions; OTHER _less regular_ constructions; which two constructions of all, are legitimate uses of the participle; which constructions are of doubtf

propriety

--_Participles_, to what RELATE, or in what state GOVERNED

--_Participle_, as relating to a phrase or sentence, --taken abstractly, --irregularly used in Eng as substitute for infinand overns, --nom absol with, to what equivalent, --each requires its appropriate FORM, --questionable uses of, admitted by MURR _et al_; why BROWN is disposed to condeularities

--_Participle_ and particip noun, distinction between, with respect to govern_, multiplied uses of, lawful and forced, illustrated, --equivalence of do to infin arded by BROWN, --the ”double nature” of, CROMB on; his views, how accord with those of MURR _et al_, HILEY'S treatment of; BROWN'S strictures on do

--_Participles_, place of: --active, governm of

--_Participle_, trans, converted to a noun: --converted, _when_ the expression should be changed: --followed by an adj, its conversion into a noun appar ied: --not to be used for infin, or other more appropriate term: --use of, for a no a verb of _preventing_, how to be ed

--_Participles_, converted, disposal of their adverbs: -- word in sense: --should have a clear reference to their subjects: --needless use of, for nouns, to be avoided: --punct of: --derivation of: --poet peculiarities in the use of

_Parts of speech_,of the term: --_Parts of speech_, named and defined: --what explanations uish the different: --why needful that learners be early taught to make for themselves the prop distribution of: --WILS on the distribution of: --the preferable _number_ with respect to; the office of, specifically stated

--The _parts of speech_, passage exe all

--Examples of a partic _part of speech_ accumulated in a sentence

--Etymol and Synt of the different _parts of speech_, see _Article, Noun, Adjective_, &c

_Passions_ of the mind, by what tones to be expressed

_Passive verb_, defined

--_Pass verbs_ contrasted with active-trans, verbs, in respect to the object or the agent of the action; their co

--_Pass verb_ BE LOVED, conjug affiruished fro active forms nearly equivalent to them, (_is rejoiced, rejoices_; _aovern the obj case in Eng; CROMB

in this category, cited, canon, pseudo-canons

--_Pass verb_, what should always take for its subj or nom: --takes the same case after as before it, when both words refer to the sa: --between two noree, (”_Words_ ARE wind,”) See _Unco-Passive_, &c

_Passive_ form of an active-intrans verb followed by a prep and its objective, (”_He_ WAS LAUGHED AT,”) _Passive_ sense of the act form of the verb, (”_The books continue_ SELLING,”)

_Past for future_, see _Prophecy_

_Pauses_, term defined

--_Pauses_, kinds of, named and explained: --the distinctive, duration of: --after what manner should be formed: --forced, unintentional, their effect: --emphatic or rhetorical, applicat and office of: --harmonic, kinds of; these, essential to verse

--_Pauses_, abrupt, punct: --e style of charlatans &c, as offending against purity

_Penta HEROIC; its quality and adaptation: --eiac stanza_: --_trochaic_, example of, said by MURR _et al_ to be very uncommon; was unknown to DR JOH and other old prosodists: --the two exarammars, whence came; a couplet of these scanned absurdly by HIL; HART mistakes the metre of do: --_dactylic_, example of, (”_Salutation to America_,”)

_Perfect_, adj, whether admits of comparison; why its comparis by adverbs not wholly inadmissible