Part 273 (2/2)
_Idea of unity_, and of _plurality_, how formed
_Identity of words_, the principle of, considered --_Identity, proper_, RULE for, (”Sa
_Idioms_ or peculiarities of expression, when to be approved or valued
_If_, the Biblical use of, to express an enorance, literary_, Crit N concerning
_Iery_, or _Vision_, explained
_Imperative mood_, defined --_Imperat mood_, why so called; in what manner applied --its one tense, and the iated --what no; do, in Lat, Ital, Fr, and Span --may have all the persons and numbers --poet
_Imperfect tense_, defined --_I tense so called --in its simple form is the _preterit_ --in the pot and subj uished --of the sub, to express a mere supposition, with indef time
_Imperfect participle_, or _first part_, defined --its forhtly terram, stands --is applicable to time pres, past, or fut; is not always active, even when derived from an act verb --may be turned to a , --Allowing_, &c) --distinguished, with respect to governm, from a particip noun --as equivalent to infin ular equivalence --how coerund --its nature and construc
_Impersonal verbs_, so called, their peculiarity of use --called _e, what embraces
_In_ and _into_, difference between; nature of the relation expressed by each; derivation of, from Sax
_Inclusive_ and _exclusive_ terible errors_, Crit N concerning
_Indefinite article_, see _An, A_ _Indefinite pronouns_, of the class _pronom adjectives_
_Independent_, see _Absolute_
_Index_, or _hand_, use of
_Indicative mood_, defined --_Indic mood_, why so called; its nature and use --use of its pres tense --do of its form of the pluperf in lieu of the pot pluperf
--wherein differs characteristically from the subj; the two moods continually confounded by writers --_Indic mood_, for
--employed to express a conditional circue, see _Aardness_
_Infinitive mood_, defined --_Infin mood_, so called in oppos to the other uished by the prep _to_ before it --its _pres_, the ROOT, or radical verb; what _time_ it expresses --archaic for
--Synt of --_Infin overned; (see _To_:) --true construc of, explained by the 18th Rule of the Synt
--why sioverned by a prep, in Fr, Span, or Ital
--whiiven by NIX
--how expressed in the Anglo-Sax of the 11th century --why rammarians teach, be | considered a noun --DR WILS on the charac and import of --to what other ters chiefly may stand --taken abstractly, as subject of finite verb --Loose _infinitives_, ie --_Infin mood_, position of --misplacearded, (”_You are to_ BLAME;”) hypercrit teachings of SANB and BLAIR hereon --_Infin_, after _bid, dare_, &c, without TO --whether used with TO after _have, help_, and _find_ --_Infin_, BY WHAT _governed_, often i to the instructions of MURR
--_Infinitives_ connected, governed by one preposition --_Infinitive_, ellipsis of, after _to_, whether to be approved --sometimes doubtful whether transitive or intransitive --in pause, or in re of --Greek construc of, in poetic use