Part 11 (2/2)
Contemporary Records
Though the comparatively small-sized newspapers of the day were crowded with news of the progress of the Revolutionary War, then raging, no little s.p.a.ce was given to reports and discussions of this remarkable darkening of the sun.
A correspondent of the Boston _Gazette and Country Journal_ (of May 29, 1780) reported observations made at Ipswich Hamlet, Ma.s.s., ”by several gentlemen of liberal education:”
”About eleven o'clock the darkness was such as to demand our attention, and put us upon making observations. At half past eleven, in a room with three windows, twenty-four panes each, all open toward the southeast and south, large print could not be read by persons of good eyes.
”About twelve o'clock, the windows being still open, a candle cast a shade so well defined on the wall, as that profiles were taken with as much ease as they could have been in the night.
”About one o'clock a glint of light which had continued to this time in the east, shut in, and the darkness was greater than it had been for any time before.... We dined about two, the windows all open, and two candles burning on the table.
”In the time of the greatest darkness some of the ... fowls went to their roost. c.o.c.ks crowed in answer to one another as they commonly do in the night. Woodc.o.c.ks, which are night birds, whistled as they do _only_ in the dark. Frogs peeped. In short, there was the appearance of midnight at noonday.
”About three o'clock the light in the west increased, the motion of the clouds [became] more quick, their color higher and more bra.s.sy than at any time before. There appeared to be quick flashes or coruscations, not unlike the aurora borealis.... About half past four our company, which had pa.s.sed an unexpected night very cheerfully together, broke up.”
Of the night following, this gentleman (then at Salem) wrote:
”Perhaps it never was darker since the children of Israel left the house of bondage. This gross darkness held till about one o'clock, although the moon had fulled but the day before.”
The Boston _Independent Chronicle_ of June 8 quoted from Thomas's _Ma.s.sachusetts Spy_:
”During the whole time a sickly, melancholy gloom overcast the face of nature. Nor was the darkness of the night less uncommon and terrifying than that of the day; notwithstanding there was almost a full moon, no object was discernible, but by the help of some artificial light, which when seen from the neighboring houses and other places at a distance, appeared through a kind of Egyptian darkness, which seemed almost impervious to the rays.
”This unusual phenomenon excited the fears and apprehensions of many people. Some considered it as a portentous omen of the wrath of Heaven in vengeance denounced against the land, others as the immediate harbinger of the last day, when 'the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light.'”
Not only over the land, but out at sea also, the unnatural darkness of the day and night of May 19, 1780, was observed. In the _Independent Chronicle_ of June 15, 1780, a correspondent, telling of interviews with various observers, said:
”I have also seen a very sensible captain of a vessel, who was that morning about forty leagues southeast of Boston. He says the cloud which appeared at the west was the blackest he ever saw. About eleven o'clock there was a little rain, and it grew dark. Between one and two he was obliged to light a large candle to steer by.... Between nine and ten at night, he ordered his men to take in some of the sails, but it was so dark that they could not find the way from one mast to the other.”
Thoughts Turned to the Judgment
This writer commented as follows concerning the feelings awakened by the event:
”Various have been the sentiments of people concerning the designs of Providence in spreading the unusual darkness over us. Some suppose it portentous of the last scene. I wish it may have some good effect on the minds of the wicked, and that they may be excited to prepare for that solemn day.”
The _Independent Chronicle_ of June 22, 1780, printed a letter from Dr.
Samuel Stearns, who had been appealed to because of his knowledge ”in philosophy and astronomy.” First, he disposed of one suggestion that had been made:
”That the darkness was not caused by an eclipse is manifest by the various positions of the planets of our system at that time; for the moon was more than one hundred and fifty degrees from the sun all that day.”
Then, in the rather heavy language of the science of that period, this writer told how the action of the sun's heat was continually projecting into the atmosphere particles of earthy matter; and in his opinion it was some ”vast collection of such particles that caused the late uncommon darkness.” But as to the real accounting for the phenomenon he wrote:
”The primary cause must be imputed to Him that walketh through the circuit of heaven, who stretcheth out the heaven like a curtain, who maketh the clouds His chariot, who walketh upon the wings of the wind. It was He, at whose voice the stormy winds are obedient, that commanded these exhalations to be collected and condensed together, that with them He might darken both the day and the night; which darkness was, perhaps, not only a token of His indignation against the crying iniquities and abominations of the people, but an omen of some future destruction.”
<script>