Part 16 (2/2)

_Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Grant,_

_At Home,_

_Thursday evening, December fifth, 1895,_

_At half-past eight o'clock._

_263 East Thirteenth Street._]

In sending out invitations for the various anniversaries that pleasantly diversify the years of a long wedded life, the simplest form will always be found in the best taste. There are varied devices for rendering these invitations striking in effect, such as silvered and gilded cards for silver and golden weddings, thin wooden cards for the wooden wedding, etc., but good taste would indicate that none of these, not even gold and silver lettering (though this last is least objectionable of all), should be used. The large engraved ”At Home”

card, or the small sheet of heavy note paper, also engraved, are the most elegant.

”No Presents Received.”

The words, ”No presents received,” are sometimes engraved in the lower left hand corner of the note sheet, or card. A much-to-be-admired custom, since the multiplicity of invitations requiring gifts, is, in more cases than one, burdensome to the recipient.

Revise the Visiting List.

Now, that it has become the custom to engage the services of an amanuensis to direct the invitations for a crush affair by the hundred, it would be well for every hostess to frequently revise her visiting list, in order that the relatives of lately deceased friends may not be pained by seeing the dear lost name included among the invitations of the family; also, this care is necessary to remove the names of those who have recently departed from the city, and those whose acquaintance is no longer desired.

ACCEPTANCES AND REGRETS

[Ill.u.s.tration]

The essence of all etiquette is to be found in the observance of the spirit of the Golden Rule. Perhaps in no one point is the ”do unto others as ye would that they should do unto you,” more applicable than in the prompt acknowledgment of either a formal or a friendly invitation. This acknowledgment may be either denial or a.s.sent, but whatever the form, it is requisite that the proffered courtesy should be answered by a prompt and decisive acceptance or refusal. This is a duty owed by an invited guest to his prospective host or hostess and one that should never be neglected.

Answering an Invitation.

In accepting or declining an invitation close attention should be paid to the form in which it is written and the same style followed in the answer. For instance: should the invitation be formal, the answer should preserve the same degree of formality; while a friendly invitation in note form should meet with an acceptance or regret couched in the same terms. Another rule to be rigidly observed is, that the acceptance or refusal must be written in the same person that characterized the invitation. For instance: if ”Mr. and Mrs. Algernon Smith request the pleasure of the company of Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Bronson at dinner, etc.,” with equal stateliness ”Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Bronson accept with pleasure the kind invitation of Mr. and Mrs.

Algernon Smith.” To do otherwise would imply ignorance of the very rudiments of social or grammatical rules.

A friendly note of invitation, beginning somewhat after this fas.h.i.+on: ”Mr. Smith and I would be pleased to have you and Mr. Brown, etc.,”

would be accepted or declined in the same fas.h.i.+on and person, as: ”Mr.

Brown and I accept with pleasure your kind invitation, etc.” To answer such an invitation with a formal acceptance, or regret, written in the third person, as given above, would display profound ignorance of social customs.

An acceptance or regret, written in the first person, receives the signature of the writer, but one written in the third person remains unsigned. To sign it would produce a confusion of persons and be ungrammatical to the last degree. Another error to be avoided is that of beginning in this fas.h.i.+on: ”I accept with pleasure the kind invitation of Mr. and Mrs. John Jones,” this also producing a change of person altogether inadmissible. Neither must one be betrayed into the mistake of using the words, ”will accept,” thus throwing the acceptance into the future tense, when, in reality, you _do_ accept, in the present tense, at the moment of writing.

Accepting a Dinner Invitation.

Inc.u.mbent upon us as it is to answer the majority of our invitations in either the affirmative or negative, there are degrees of necessity even here, for, sin as we may in all other particulars, there is an unwritten code like unto the laws of the Medes and Persians which declareth that the invitations to a dinner are not to be lightly set aside. First, an invitation to a dinner is the highest social compliment that a host and hostess can pay to those invited, and, second, the guests are limited in number and painstakingly arranged in congenial couples by the careful hostess. Judge, then, of her disappointment, when, at the last moment, some delinquent sends in a hasty regret leaving little or no time to fill that terror of all dinner-givers, that skeleton at the feast, an empty chair. One such failure is sufficient to ruin the most carefully-arranged table and is an injury to host and hostess that only the occurrence of some unforeseen calamity can justify.

[Ill.u.s.tration: ANSWERING AN INVITATION.]

<script>