Part 37 (1/2)
”has absolutely nothing more to do with the house and domestic affairs; he turns the care for them over to his wife, who is obliged to procure provisions as well as she can and cook them. The husband devotes himself to drinking, eating, smoking, loafing, and sleeping, and takes no more concern about the affairs of his family than if he had none at all. _If he goes out to fish or hunt, it is rather to amuse himself than to help his wife and children...._ Even the care of his cattle the poor wife, despite all her other work, shares with him. The only thing she is not allowed to meddle with is the sale. This is a prerogative which const.i.tutes the man's honor and which he would not allow anyone to take away from him with impunity.”
The wife, he goes on to say, has to cut the fire-wood and carry it to the house, gather roots and other food and prepare it for the whole family, milk the cows, and take care of the children. The older daughters help her, but need so much watching that they are only an additional care; and all this time the husband ”lies lazily on his back.” ”Such is the wretched life of the Hottentot woman,” he sums up; ”she lives in a perpetual slavery.” Nor is there any family life or companions.h.i.+p, they eat separately, and
”the wife never sets foot in the husband's room, which is separated from the rest of the house; she seldom enjoys his company. He commands as master, she obeys as slave, without ever complaining.”
”REGARD FOR WOMEN”
”What we admire in Hottentots is their regard for women.” Here are some more ill.u.s.trations of this loving ”regard for women.” The Rev. J.
Philip (II., 207) says that the Namaqua women begged Moffat to remain with them, telling him that before he came ”we were treated by the men as brutes, and worse than they treated brutes.” While the men loafed they had to go and collect food, and if they returned unsuccessful, as was often the case, they were generally beaten. They had to cook for the men and were not allowed a bite till they had finished their meal.
”When they had eaten, we were obliged to retire from their presence to consume the offals given to us.” When twins are born, says Kolben (304), there is great rejoicing if they are boys; two fat buffaloes are killed, and all the neighbors invited to the feast; but if the twins are girls, two sheep only are killed and there is no feast or rejoicing. If one of the twins is a girl she is invariably killed, buried alive, or exposed on a tree or in the bushes. When a boy has reached a certain age he is subjected to a peculiarly disgusting ceremony, and after that he may insult his mother with impunity whenever he chooses: ”he may cudgel her, if he pleases, to suit his whim, without any danger of being called to an account for it.” Kolben says he often witnessed such insolence, which was even applauded as a sign of manliness and courage. ”What barbarity!” he exclaims. ”It is a result of the contempt which these peoples feel for women.” He used to remonstrate with them, but they could hardly restrain their impatience, and the only answer he could get was ”_it is the custom of the Hottentots, they have never done otherwise_.”
Andersson (_Ngami_, 332) says of the Namaqua Hottentots:
”If a man becomes tired of his wife, he unceremoniously returns her to the parental roof, and however much she (or the parents) may object to so summary a proceeding, there is no remedy.”
In Kolben's time wives convicted of adultery were killed, while the men could do as they chose. In later times a las.h.i.+ng with a strap of rhinoceros hide was subst.i.tuted for burning. Kolben thought that the serious punishment for adultery prevalent in his time argued that there must be love among the Hottentots, though he confessed he could see no signs of it. He was of course mistaken in his a.s.sumption, for, as was made clear in our chapter on Jealousy, murderous rage at an infringement on a man's conjugal property does not const.i.tute or prove love, but exists entirely apart from it.
CAPACITY FOR REFINED LOVE
The injuriousness of ”false facts” to science is ill.u.s.trated by a remark which occurs in the great work on the natives of South Africa by Dr. Fritsch, who is justly regarded as one of the leading authorities on that subject. Speaking of the Hottentots (Namaqua) he says (351) that ”whereas Tindall indicates sensuality and selfishness as two of their most prominent characteristics, Th. Hahn lauds their conjugal attachment independent of fleshly love.” Here surely is unimpeachable evidence, for Theophilus Hahn, the son of a missionary, was born and bred among these peoples. But if we refer to the pa.s.sage which Fritsch alluded to (_Globus_, XII., 306), we find that the reasons Hahn gives for believing that Hottentots are capable of something higher than carnal desires are that many of them, though rich enough to have a harem, content themselves with one wife, and that if a wife dies before her husband, he very seldom marries again.
Yet in the very next sentence Hahn mentions a native trait which sufficiently explains both these customs. ”Brides,” he says, ”cost many oxen and sheep, and the men, as among other South African peoples, the Kaffirs, for instance, would rather have big herds of cattle than a good-looking wife.” Apart from this explanation, I fail to see what necessary connection there is between a man's being content with one wife and his capacity for sentimental love, since his greed for cattle and his lack of physical stamina and appet.i.te fully account for his monogamy. This matter must be judged from the Hottentot point of view, not from ours. It is well known that in regions where polygamy prevails a man who wishes to be kind to his wife does not content himself with her, but marries another, or several others, to share the hard work with her. These Hottentots have not enough consideration for their hard-worked wives to do even that.
HOTTENTOT COa.r.s.eNESS
The coa.r.s.eness and obscenity of the Hottentots const.i.tute further reasons for believing them incapable of refined love. Their eulogist, Kolben, himself was obliged to admit that they ”find a peculiar pleasure in filth and stench” and ”are in the matter of diet the filthiest people in the world.” The women eat their own vermin, which swarm in their scant attire. Nor is decency the object for which they wear this scant dress---quite the reverse. Speaking of the male Hottentot's very simple dress, Barrow says (I., 154) that
”if the real intent of it was the promotion of decency, it should seem that he has widely missed his aim, as it is certainly one of the most immodest objects, in such a situation as he places it, that could have been contrived.”
And concerning the little ap.r.o.n worn by the women he says:
”Great pains seem to be taken by the women to attract notice toward this part of their persons. Large metal b.u.t.tons ...
or anything that makes a great show, are fastened to the borders of this ap.r.o.n.”
Kolben relates that when a Hottentot desires to marry a girl he goes with his father to the girl's father, who gives the answer after consulting with his wife. If the verdict is unfavorable ”the gallant's love for the beauty is readily cured and he casts his eyes on another one.” But a refusal is rarely given unless the girl is already promised to another. The girl, too, is consulted, but only nominally, for if she refuses she can retain her liberty only by an all-night struggle with her suitor in which she usually succ.u.mbs, after which she has to marry him whether she wishes to or not. Kolben gives other details of the marriage ceremony which are too filthy to be even hinted at here.
FAT VERSUS SENTIMENT
By persons who had lived many years among the Colonial Hottentots, Fritsch (328) was a.s.sured that these people, far from being the models of chast.i.ty Kolben tried to prove them, indulged in licentious festivals lasting several days, at which all restraints were cast aside. And this brings us back to our starting-point--Dr. Jakobowski's peculiar argument concerning the ”love poems” which he feels sure must be sung at the erotic dances of the natives, though they are carefully concealed from the missionaries. If they were poems of sentiment, the missionaries would not disapprove, and there would be no reason for concealing them; but the foregoing remarks show clearly enough what kind of ”love” they would be likely to sing about. If any doubt remained on the subject the following delightful confession, which the eugolist Hahn makes in a moment of confidence, would settle the matter. To appreciate the pa.s.sage, bear in mind that the Hottentots are the people among whom excessive posterior corpulence (steatopyga) is especially admired as the acme of physical attractions. Now Hahn says (335):
”The young girls drink whole cups of liquid fat, and for a good reason, the object being to attain a very rotund body by a fattening process, in order that Hymen may claim them as soon as possible. They do not grow sentimental and sick from love and jealousy, nor do they die from the anguish and woes of love, as our women do, nor engage in love-intrigues, but they look at the whole matter in a very materialistic and sober way. _Their sole love-affair is the fattening process, on the result of which, as with a pig, depends the girl's value and the demand for her._”
In this last sentence, which I have taken the liberty to italicize, lies the philosophy of African ”love” in general, and I am glad to be able to declare it on such unquestionable authority. What a Hottentot ”regards” in a woman is _Fat_; _Sentiment_ is out of the question.
When Hottentots are together, says Kolben,
”you never see them give tender kisses or cast loving glances at each other. Day and night, on every occasion, they are so cold and so indifferent to each other that you would not believe that they love each other or are married. If in a hut there were twenty Hottentots with their wives, it would be impossible to tell, either from their words or actions, which of them belonged together.”
SOUTH AFRICAN LOVE-POEMS
As intimated on a preceding page, there are, among Dr. Jakobowski's examples of Hottentot lyrics[139] a few which may be vaguely included in the category of love-poems. ”Where did you hear that I love you while you are unloving toward me?” complained one Hottentot; while another warned his friend: ”That is the misfortune pursuing you that you love where you ought not to!” A third declared. ”I shall not cease to love however much they (_i.e._, the parents or guardians) may oppose me,” A fourth addresses this song to a young girl: