Volume Ii Part 4 (1/2)

29, the most eastward and most northward countries, Peraea and Galilee are connected. [Pg 73] In that pa.s.sage the single places are mentioned which Tiglath-pilezer took; then, the whole districts, ”Gilead and Galilee, the whole land of Naphtali.” By the latter words, that part of Galilee is made especially prominent upon which the catastrophe fell most severely and completely. In the phrase, ”Galilee of the Gentiles,”

Galilee is a geographical designation which was already current at the time of the Prophet. There is no reason for fixing the extent of ancient Galilee differently from that of the more modern Galilee,--for a.s.signing to it a more limited extent. We are told in 1 Kings ix. 11, that the twenty cities which Solomon gave to Hiram lay in the land of _Galil_, but not that the country was limited to them. The qualification, ”of the Gentiles,” is nowhere else met with in the Old Testament; it is peculiar to the Prophet. It serves as a hint to point out in what the disgrace of Galilee and Peraea consisted. This _Theodoret_ also saw. He says: ”He calls it 'Galilee of the Gentiles'

because it was inhabited by other tribes along with the Jews; for this reason, he says also of the inhabitants of those countries, that they were walking in darkness, and speaks of the inhabitants of that land as living in the shadow and land of death, and promises the brightness of heavenly light.” It is of no small importance to observe that Isaiah does not designate Galilee according to what it was at the time when this prophecy was uttered, _but according to what it was to become in future_. The distress by the Gentiles appears in chap. vii. and viii.

everywhere as a _future one_. At the time when the Prophet prophesied, the Jewish territory still existed in its integrity. In vers. 4, and 5-7, he announces a.s.shur's inroad into the land of Israel as a _future one_; in the present moment, it was the kingdom of the ten tribes in connection with Aram which attacked and threatened Judea. The superior power of the world which, according to the clear foresight of the Prophet, was threatening, could not but be sensibly felt in the North and East. For these formed the border parts against the Asiatic world's power; it was from that quarter that its invasions commonly took place; and it was to be expected that there, in the first instance, the Gentiles would establish themselves, just as, in former times, they had maintained themselves longest there; comp. Judges i. 30-38; _Keil_ on 1 Kings ix. 11. But very soon after this, [Pg 74] the name ”Galilee of the Gentiles” ceased to be one merely prophetical; Tiglathpilezer carried the inhabitants of Galilee and Gilead into exile, 2 Kings xv.

29. _At a later period_, when the Greek empire ”peopled Palestine, in the most attractive places, with new cities, restored many which, in consequence of the destructive wars, had fallen into decay, filled all of them, more or less, with Greek customs and inst.i.tutions, and, along with the newly-opened extensive commerce and traffic, everywhere spread Greek manners also,” this change was chiefly limited to Galilee and Peraea; Judea remained free from it; comp. _Ewald_, _Geschichte Israels_, iii. 2 S. 264 ff. In 1 Maccab. v. Galaaditis and Galilee appear as those parts of the country where the existence of the Jews is almost hopelessly endangered by the Gentiles living in the midst of, and mixed up with them. What is implied in ”Galilee of the Gentiles”

may be learned from that chapter, where even the _expression_ reverts in ver. 15. With external dependence upon the Gentiles, however, the spiritual dependence went hand in hand. These parts of the country could the less oppose any great resistance to the influences of heathendom, that they were separated, by a considerable distance, from the religious centre of the nation--the temple and _metropolis_, in which the higher Israelitish life was concentrated. A consequence of this degeneracy was the contempt in which the Galileans were held at the time of Christ, John i. 47, vii. 52; Matt. xxvi. 69.--But in what consisted the _honour_ or the _glorification_ which Galilee, along with Peraea, was to obtain in the after-time? Chap. ix. 5 (6), where the deliverance and salvation announced in the preceding verses are connected with the person of the _Redeemer_, show that we must not seek for it in any other than that of the Messianic time. Our Lord spent the greater part of His public life in the neighbourhood of the lake of Gennesareth; it was there that Capernaum--His ordinary residence--was situated, Matt. ix. 1. From Galilee were most of His disciples. In Galilee He performed many _miracles_; and it was there that the preaching of the Gospel found much entrance, so that even the name of the Galileans pa.s.sed over in the first centuries to the Christians.

_Theodoret_ strikingly remarks: ”Galilee was the native country of the holy Apostles; there the [Pg 75] Lord performed most of His miracles; there He cleansed the leper; there He gave back to the centurion his servant sound; there He removed the fever from Peter's wife's mother; there He brought back to life the daughter of Jairus who was dead; there He multiplied the loaves; there He changed the water into wine.”

Very aptly has _Gesenius_ compared Micah v. 1 (2). Just as in that pa.s.sage the birth of the Messiah is to be for the honour of the small, unimportant Bethlehem, so here Galilee, which hitherto was covered with disgrace, which was reproached by the Jews, that there no prophet had ever risen, is to be brought to honour, and to be glorified by the appearance of the Messiah. It was from the pa.s.sage under review that the opinion of the Jews was derived, that the Messiah would appear in the land of Galilee. Comp. _Sohar_, p. 1. fol. 119 ed. Amstelod.; fol.

74 ed. Solisbae: ????? ????? ????? ???? ?????. ”King Messiah will reveal himself in the land of Galilee.” But we must beware of putting prophecy and fulfilment into a merely accidental outward relation, of changing the former into a mere foretelling, and of supposing, in reference to the latter, that, unless the letter of the prophecy had existed, Jesus might as well have made Judea the exclusive scene of His ministry. Both prophecy and history are overruled by a higher idea, by the truth absolutely valid in reference to the Church of the Lord, that where the distress is greatest, help is nearest. If it was established that the misery of the covenant-people, both outward and spiritual, was especially concentrated in Galilee, then it is also sure that He who was sent to the lost sheep of Israel must devote His princ.i.p.al care just to that part of the country. The prophecy is not exhausted by the one fulfilment; and the fulfilment is a new prophecy. Wheresoever in the Church we perceive a new Galilee of the Gentiles, we may, upon the ground of this pa.s.sage, confidently hope that the saving activity of the Lord will gloriously display itself.

Chap. ix. 1 (2). ”_The people that walk in darkness see a great light, they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them light ariseth._”

”The people” are the inhabitants of the countries mentioned in the preceding verse; but they are not viewed in contrast to, and exclusive of the other members of the covenant-people,--for [Pg 76] according to chap. viii. 22, darkness is to cover the whole of it--but only as that portion which comes chiefly into consideration. _Light_ is, in the symbolical language of Scripture, salvation. That in which the _salvation_ here consists cannot be determined from the words themselves, but must follow from the context. It will not be possible to deny that, according to it, the darkness consists, in the first instance, in the oppression by the Gentiles, and, hence, salvation consists in the _deliverance_ from this oppression, and in being raised to the dominion of the world; and in ver. 2 (3) ff., we have, indeed, the farther displaying of the light, or deliverance. But it will be as little possible to deny that the sad companion of outward oppression by the Gentile world is the _spiritual_ misery of the inward dependence upon it. _Farther_,--It is as certain that the elevation of the covenant-people to the dominion of the world cannot take place all on a sudden, and without any farther ceremony, inasmuch as, according to a fundamental view of the Old Testament, all outward deliverance appears as depending upon conversion and regeneration. ”Thou returnest,” so we read in Deut. x.x.x. 2, 3, ”to the Lord thy G.o.d, and the Lord thy G.o.d turneth to thy captivity.” And in the same chapter, vers. 6, 7: ”The Lord thy G.o.d circ.u.mciseth thy heart, and _then_ the Lord thy G.o.d putteth all these curses upon thine enemies.” Before Gideon is called to be the deliverer of the people from Midian, the Prophet must first hold up their sin to the people, Judg. vi. 8 ff., and Gideon does not begin his work with a struggle against the outward enemies, but must, first of all, as Jerubbabel, declare war against sin. All the prosperous periods in the people's history are, at the same time, periods of spiritual revival. We need only think of David, Jehoshaphat, and Hezekiah. Outward deliverance always presents itself in history as an _addition_ only which is bestowed upon those seeking after the kingdom of G.o.d. Without the inward foundation, the bestowal of the outward blessing would be only a mockery, inasmuch as the holy G.o.d could not but immediately take away again what He had given. But the circ.u.mstance that it is the _outward_ salvation, the deliverance from the heathen servitude, the elevation of the people of G.o.d to the dominion of the world, as in Christ it so gloriously took [Pg 77]

place, which are here, in the first instance, looked at, is easily accounted for from the historical cause of this prophetic discourse which, _in the first instance, is directed against the fears of the destruction of the kingdom of G.o.d by the world's power_. Ps. xxiii. 4; ”Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil; for thou art with me, thy rod and thy staff they comfort me,”

must so much the more he considered as the fundamental pa.s.sage of the verse under consideration, that the Psalm, too, refers to the whole Christian Church. It was in the appearance of Christ, and the salvation brought through Him, in the midst of the deepest misery, that this Psalm found its most glorious confirmation.--?????, ”darkness of death,” is the darkness which prevails in death or in Sheol. Such compositions commonly occur in proper names only, not in appellatives; and hence, by ”the land of the darkness (shadow) of death,” h.e.l.l is to be understood. But darkness of h.e.l.l is, by way of a shortened comparison, not unfrequently used for designating the deepest darkness.

The point of comparison is here furnished by the first member of the verse. Parallel is Ps. lx.x.xviii. 4 ff., where Israel laments that the Lord had thrust it down into dark h.e.l.l. The Preterite tense of the verbs in our verse is to be explained from the prophetical view which converts the Future into the Present. How little soever modern exegesis can realise this seeing by, and in faith, and how much soever it is everywhere disposed to introduce the _real_ Present instead of the _ideal_, yet even _Ewald_ is compelled to remark on the pa.s.sage under consideration: ”The Prophet, as if he were describing something which in his mind he had seen as certain long ago, here represents everything in the past, and scarcely makes an exception of this in the new start which he takes in the middle.” At the time when the Prophet uttered this Prophecy, even the _darkness_ still belonged to the future. As yet the world's power had not gained the ascendancy over Israel; but here the light has already dispelled the darkness.

It now merely remains for us to view more particularly the quotation of these two verses in Matt. iv. 12-17. ????sa? d?--thus the section begins--?t? ??????? pa?ed???, ??e????se? e?? t?? Ga???a?a?. Since, in these words, we are told that Jesus, after having received the intelligence of the imprisonment of [Pg 78] John, withdrew into Galilee, we cannot for a moment think of His having sought in Galilee, safety from Herod; for Galilee just belonged to Herod, and Judea afforded security against him. The verb ??a???e?? denotes, on the contrary, the withdrawing into the _angulus terrae_ Galilee, as contrasted with the civil and ecclesiastical centre. The _time_ of the beginning of Christ's preaching (His ministry hitherto had been merely a kind of prelude) was determined by the imprisonment of John, as certainly as, according to the prophecy of the Old Testament, the territories of the activity of both were immediately bordering upon one another, and by that very circ.u.mstance _the place_, too, was indirectly determined; for it was fixed by the prophecy under consideration that Galilee was to be the scene of the chief ministry of Christ. If, then, the time for the beginning of the ministry had come, He must also depart into Galilee. The connection, therefore, is this: After he had received the intelligence of the imprisonment of John--in which the call to Him for the beginning of His ministry was implied--He departed into Galilee, and especially to Capernaum, vers. 12, 13; for it was this part of the country which, by the prophecy, was fixed as the main scene of His Messianic activity, vers. 14-16. It was there, therefore, that He continued the preaching of John, ver. 17.--?a? ?ata??p?? t??

?a?a??t--it is said in ver. 13--????? ?at???se? e?? ?ape??a?? t??

pa?a?a?a.s.s?a?, ?? ?????? ?a????? ?a? ?ef?a?e?. Christ had hitherto had His settled abode at Nazareth, and thence undertook His wanderings. The immediate reason why He did not remain there is not stated by Matthew; but we learn it from Luke and John. In accordance with his object, Matthew takes cognizance of this one circ.u.mstance only, that, according to the prophecy of the Old Testament, Capernaum was very specially fitted for being the residence of Christ. The town was situated on the western sh.o.r.e of the Lake of Gennesareth. Quite in opposition to his custom elsewhere, Matthew describes the situation of the town 80 minutely, because this knowledge served to afford a better insight into the fulfilment of the prophecy of the Old Testament. The designation t??

pa?a?a?a.s.s?a? stands in reference to ?d?? ?a??ss??, in ver. 15. ??

??????, &c., may either mean: ”In the borders of Zebulun and Naphtali,”

_i. e._ in that place where [Pg 79] the borders of both the countries meet,--or t? ???a may, according to the a.n.a.logy of the Hebrew ??????, denote the borders in the sense of ”territory,” as in Matt. ii. 16.

From a comparison of ?? ?a????? ?a? ?efa?e? of the prophecy in ver. 15, to which the words stand in direct reference, it follows that the latter view is the correct one. Whether Capernaum lay just on the borders between the two countries was of no consequence to the prophecy, and hence was of none to Matthew.--The phrase ??a p?????? does not, according to the very sound remark of _De Wette_, point to the intention, but to the objective aim. The question, however, is to what the ??a p?????? is to be referred,--whether merely to that which immediately precedes, viz., the change of residence from Nazareth to Capernaum, or, at the same time to ??e????se? e?? t?? Ga???a?a?. The latter is alone correct. The prophecy which the Evangelist has in view referred mainly to Galilee, or the territory of Zebulun and Naphtali in general; but, according to the express remark of the Evangelist, Nazareth itself was likewise situated in Galilee. The advantage which Capernaum had over it was this only, that in Capernaum the ?d?? ?a??ss??

of the prophecy was found again, and that, therefore, thence the p??a?

t?? ???d???? of the prophecy also could be better realized, inasmuch as across the lake there was an easy communication from that place with the country beyond Jordan. The connection is hence this: After the imprisonment of the Baptist, Jesus, in order to enter upon His ministry, went to Galilee, and especially to Capernaum, which was situated on the lake, in order that thus the prophecy of Isaiah as to the glorification of Galilee, and of the region on the lake, might be fulfilled.--Matthew has abridged the pa.s.sage. From chap. viii. 23 (ix.

1) he has taken the designation of the part of the country, in order that the agreement of fulfilment and prophecy might become visible. The words from ??--t?? ????? may either be regarded as a fragment taken out of its connection, so that they are viewed as a quotation, and as forming a period by themselves (this, from a comparison of the original, seems most natural);--or we may also suppose, that the Evangelist, having broken-up the connection with the preceding, puts these words into a new connection, so that, along with the ? ?a??, which has become an apposition, they form [Pg 80] the subject of the following sentence. At all events, ?d?? takes here the place of the adverb, although it may not be possible to adduce instances and proofs altogether a.n.a.logous from the Greek _usus loquendi_.--The confidence with which Matthew explains chap. viii. 23, and ix. 1 of Christ can be accounted for only from the circ.u.mstance that he recognized Christ as He who in chap. ix. 5, 6, (6, 7) is described as the author of all the blessings designated in the preceding verses. It was therefore altogether erroneous in _Gesenius_ to a.s.sert that there was the less reason for holding the Messianic explanation of chap. ix. 5, 6, as there was no testimony of the New Testament in favour of it.--It is quite obvious that Matthew does not quote the Old Testament prophecy in reference to any single special event which happened at Capernaum; but that rather the whole following account of the glorious deeds of Christ in Galilee, as well as in Peraea, down to chap. xix. 1, serves to mark the fulfilment of this Old Testament prophecy, and is subservient to this quotation. _This pa.s.sage of Matthew explains the reason, why it is that he, and Luke and Mark who closely follow him, report henceforth, until the last journey of Jesus to Jerusalem, exclusively facts which happened in Galilee, and in Peraea, which likewise was mentioned by Isaiah._ The circ.u.mstance that this fact, which is so obvious, was not perceived, has called forth a number of miserable conjectures, and has even led some interpreters to a.s.sail the credibility of the Gospel. To Matthew, who wished to show that Jesus was the Christ, the Messiah promised in the Old Testament, the interest must, in the view of the prophecy under consideration, be necessarily concentrated upon Galilee; and Mark and Luke followed him in this, perceiving that it was not becoming to them to open up a path altogether new. This was reserved to the second Apostle from among the Evangelists.

Ver. 2 (3). ”_Thou multipliest the nation to which thou didst not increase the joy; they joy before thee like the joy in harvest, and as they rejoice when they divide the spoil._”

The Prophet beholds the joy of the Messianic time as present; he beholds the covenant-people numerous, free from all misery, and full of joy; full of delight he turns to the Lord, and praises Him for what He has done to His people.--One [Pg 81] of the privileges of the people of G.o.d is the increase which at all times takes place after they are sifted and thinned by judgments. Thus, _e.g._, it happened at the time after their return from the captivity, comp. Ps. cvii. 38, 39: ”And He blesseth them, and they are multiplied greatly, and He suffereth not their cattle to decrease. They who were minished and brought low through affliction, oppression, and sorrow.” But this increase took place most gloriously at the time of Christ, when a numerous mult.i.tude of adopted sons from among the Gentiles were received into the Church of G.o.d, and thus the promise to Abraham: ”I will make of thee a great nation” (??? as in the pa.s.sage before us, and not ??), received its final fulfilment. From the arguments which we advanced in Vol. i. on Hosea ii. 1, it appears that the increase which the Church received by the reception of the Gentiles is, according to the biblical view, to be considered as an increase of the people of Israel. The fundamental thought of Ps. lx.x.xvii. is: Zion the birth-place of the nations; by the new birth the Gentiles are received in Israel. The manner in which the Gentiles show their anxiety to be received in Israel is described by Isaiah in chap. xliv. 5. The commentary on the words: ”Thou multipliest the nation,” is furnished to us by chap. liv. 1 ff., where, in immediate connection with the prophecy regarding the Servant of G.o.d who bears the sin of the world, it is said: ”Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear, break forth into singing, and shout thou that didst not travail with child; for more are the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife, saith the Lord.” Comp. also chap. lxvi.

7-9, and Ezek. x.x.xvii. 25, 26: ”And my servant David shall be their prince for ever. And I make a covenant with them and multiply them.”

Several interpreters, _e. g._ _Calvin_, _Vitringa_, suppose that the Prophet in this verse (and so likewise in the two following verses) speaks, in the first instance, of a nearer prosperity, of the rapid increase of the people after the Babylonish captivity. _Vitringa_ directs attention to the fact, that the Jewish people after the captivity did not only fill Judea, but spread also in Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy. And surely we cannot deny that in this increase, no less than in the new flouris.h.i.+ng of the people after the defeat of Sennacherib also, there is a _prelude_ to the real fulfilment; [Pg 82] and that so much the more that these precursory increases, happening, as they did, regularly after the decreases, were bestowed upon the covenant-people with a view to the future appearance of Christ. These increases enter into a still closer relation to the prophecy under consideration, if we keep in mind that in chap. vii. the Prophet antic.i.p.ates in spirit the appearance of Christ, and that it is with this representation that, in the Section before us, chap. viii. 8, 10 are connected. In order to refute the explanation of _Umbriet_: ”Thou hast multiplied the _heathen_, and thereby thou hast removed all joy; but now,” &c., it will be quite sufficient to refer to the parallel pa.s.sage, chap. xxvi. 15: ”Thou increasest the _people_, O Lord, thou art glorified, thou removest all the boundaries of the land,” where, just as in the verse before us, by ???? ”the people,” Israel is designated; and that is frequently the case where the notion of the mult.i.tude, the ma.s.s only is concerned, comp. Gen. xii. 2.--”_Thou didst not increase the joy_” stands for: to whom thou formerly didst not increase the joy, to whom thou gavest but little joy, upon whom thou inflictedst severe sufferings. The ant.i.thesis is quite the same as in chap. viii. 23 (ix. 1), where the former distress is contrasted with the light which is now to s.h.i.+ne upon them, the former disgrace with the later glory; and in the same manner in chap. ix. 1 (2), where the present _light_ is rendered brighter by being contrasted with the former _darkness_. The contrast of the present _increase_ with the former absence of joys shows that the joy is to be viewed as being connected with the increase, and that if formerly the joy was less, the reason of it was chiefly in the _decrease_. Ps. cvii. 38, 39, 41, shews how affliction and decrease, joy and increase, go hand in hand; farther, Jerem. x.x.x. 19: ”And out of them proceed thanksgivings, and the voice of the merry ones; and I multiply them, and they do not decrease; and I honour them, and they are not small.” The decrease is a single symptom only of a depressed, joyless condition, which everywhere in the kingdom of G.o.d shall be brought to an end by Christ. Most of the ancient translators (LXX., Chald., Syr.) follow the marginal reading ??, ”_to him_” hast thou increased the joy. According to many modern interpreters, ?? is supposed to be a different mode of writing for ??. But no _proof_ that could stand the test can be brought forward for [Pg 83] such a mode of writing; nor is there any reason for supposing that ?? stands here in a different sense from what it does in chap. viii. 23, and it would indeed be strange that ?? should have been placed before the verb. At most, it might be supposed that the Prophet intended an ambiguous and double sense: (not/to him) didst thou increase the joy. But altogether apart from such an ambiguous and double sense, behind the negative, at all events, the positive is concealed; thou multipliest the people, and increasest to them the joy, thou who formerly didst decrease their joy, &c.; and it is to this positive that the words refer which, in Luke ii.

10, the angels address to the shepherds: ? f?e?s?e, ?d?? ???

e?a??e????a? ??? ?a??? e????? ?t?? ?sta? pa?t? t? ?a? ?t? ?t???? ???

s?e??? s?t??, ?? ?st? ???st?? ??????; comp. Matth. ii. 10.--In the following words, the Prophet expresses, in the first instance, the nature of the joy, then its greatness. The joy over the blessings received is a joy _before G.o.d_, under a sense of His immediate presence. The expression is borrowed from the sacrificial feasts in the courts before the sanctuary, at which the partakers rejoiced _before the Lord_, Deut. xii. 7, 12, 18, xiv. 26. In Immanuel, G.o.d with his blessings and gifts has truly entered into the midst of His people.

With the joy at _the dividing of the spoil_, the joy is compared only to show its greatness, just as with the joy _in the harvest_; and it is in vain that k.n.o.bel tries here to bring in a dividing of spoil.

Vers. 3, (4). ”_For the yoke of his burden and the staff of his neck, the rod of his driver thou hast broken as in the day of Midian._”

In this verse, the reason of the people's joy announced in the preceding verse is stated: it is the deliverance from the world's power, under the oppression of which they groaned, or, in point of fact, were to groan. He who imposes the _yoke_ and the _staff_, the _driver_, (an allusion to the Egyptian taskmasters, masters, comp.

Exod. iii. 7; v. 10), is a.s.shur, and the _whole_ world's power hostile to the Kingdom of G.o.d, which is represented by him, and which by Christ was to receive, and has received, a mortal blow. A prelude to the fulfilment took place by the defeat of Sennacherib under Hezekiah, comp. chap. x. 5, 24, 27; xiv. 25. After him. Babel had to experience [Pg 84] the destructive power of the Lord, the single phases of which, pervading, as they do, all history, are here comprehended in one great act. Although the definitive fulfilment begins first with the appearance of Christ in the flesh, who spoke to His people: ?a?se?te, ??? ?e?????a t?? ??s??, yet after what we remarked on ver. 2, we are fully ent.i.tled to consider the former catastrophes also of the kingdoms of the world as preludes to the real fulfilment.--??? ”shoulder” does not suit as the _membrum cui verbera infliguntur_; it comes, as is commonly the case, into consideration as that member with which burdens are borne. The _staff_ or tyranny is a heavy _burden_, comp. chap. x.

27: ”His burden shall be taken away from off thy shoulder.” ”_As in the day of Midian_” is equivalent to: as thou once didst break the yoke of Midian. This event was especially fitted to serve as a type of the glorious future victory over the world's power, partly because the oppression by Midian was very hard,--according to Judges vii. 12, Midian, Amalek, and the sons of the East broke in upon the land like gra.s.shoppers for mult.i.tude, and their camels were without number, as the sand by the seaside for mult.i.tude--partly because the help of the Lord (_thou_ hast broken) was at that time specially visible. ”I will be with thee,” says the Lord to Gideon in Judges vi. 16, ”and thou shalt smite the Midianites as one man;” and Judges vii. 2: ”The people that are with thee are too many, as that I could give the Midianites into their hands, lest Israel vaunt themselves against me, saying: Mine own hand hath saved me.”

Vers. 4, (5). ”_For every war-shoe put on with noise, and the garment rolled in blood: it is for burning, food of fire._”