~： Zhang has changed and said some nonsense. (1/2)

.... Two chapters have been changed, to say some nonsense.

Sorry, resend.

Thinking that I hadn't opened a leaflet to chat with you for a long time, so I opened a leaflet. I rarely read reviews and say in this chapter, mainly because there is no time. Then there is the fear of being influenced by readers.

With the development of web platforms, authors and readers have more interactive platforms and opportunities, which is a good thing.

Everything has advantages and disadvantages, and the bad thing is that readers can influence the author's writing through their own will.

This is actually deadly. I know that many authors have been influenced by readers, changed their thinking, and wrote according to the reader's ideas, causing the writing to collapse.

And once they used various unsubscribe and other reasons to affect their readers, they patted their butts to see other books.

Leaving the author silently in tears, I occasionally mix the author group, knowing some examples, I laugh at them in my heart: Guapi!

Some readers are really giving comments to the author, which is good, their existence is benign.

Some readers are pure lifters.

The development of the plot did not proceed as they expected, it felt unreasonable and far-fetched.

I explain some readers' doubts:

Regarding Baker Richardson's betrayal, some readers find it unreasonable. My role in shaping this character was to pave the way: gamblers, ambitionists.

These two points alone are enough to make him risky. I think I have a little bit of care for character creation. For an ambitionist and gambler, the temptation of fruit is enough for him to let go and gamble.

When I first wrote about the character of this character, I was actually laying the groundwork for some later readers. Some readers understood it, and some did not, so they thought it was far-fetched. For the author, this is a more helpless place. I used to spend time thinking about people, and I think that the really powerful author is to shape the soul of the character.

For example, if you write a supporting character without quality, then he must be full of bad language, but this does not mean that the author himself is not qualified.

For example, if you write a radical impulse, but you ca n’t do anything with the supporting role in your brain, then he must be faint and frequently, and IQ is worrying.

But sometimes, such an impulsive supporting role did something stupid, and some readers raised the bar and said that it was unreasonable. It was completely brainless.

Then, sometimes the IQ in the book, IQ fell, and was overcast.

Half is that the wise will lose everything, and no matter how wise a person is, he cannot expect everything. When Zhuge Liang was still dizzy.

Half of it is to promote the plot, you think, everything is considered, there are no flaws, how can you write it.

Necessary mistakes are understandable and needed.