~: End of this testimonial (1/2)
”My day has 48 hours (
This article was originally planned to be written yesterday, because the main text and the extravagant story were finished yesterday.
But it was very late when I finished writing the extravaganza yesterday, and my procrastination attacked, so I delayed another day and only started writing today.
Although there are some clichés, I still want to thank you all for your company along the way, because it is your book that has made it all the way to the present.
To be honest, when I typed the first word on the keyboard, I just wanted to write a story of less than 2 million words, but I didn't expect the number of words to exceed 3 million when I finished the book.
Without your subscriptions and votes all the time, I think I would definitely not be able to go so far.
Serialization is sometimes a lot like running a marathon, especially in the second half of the race, when it is often the time when it is most likely to feel tired.
The creators of the infinite stream may feel this most obviously.
Because the more wonderful copies you think of first are often put in the front, and the later you can find the less suitable copies, and readers are also easy to get tired of the same type of copy. The cerebral cortex is very The excitement of repeated stimulation will gradually decrease.
Different creators will have different solutions. In my case, because it is the first time I have tried the subject of infinite flow, I am actually crossing the river by feeling the stones. The method is probably relatively stupid, and I can only keep trying different things. The theme and style, I hope to bring you freshness.
Of course, there is a downside to doing this. Sometimes the style changes too much and it may not be easy to accept. For example, Lego copy, I chose a style close to the Lego movie, and found that the reviews are actually quite polarized. Similarly, there is Hei Fan. The problem is more serious in Hei Fan's case. Directly from the short, fast-paced copy to the slow-paced group performance, this sense of discomfort may be even stronger.
I still remember that there were a lot of criticisms at the time, even very fierce, which made me very depressed. After all, as a creator, I wrote very hard, but I was not accepted afterwards. There must be grievances.
And after that, I made many other mistakes. I spent too much space to lay out the foreshadowing, which caused some readers to be dissatisfied. Under the urging, I tried to compress the content later, which caused the previous foreshadowing to be thrown away and ended hurriedly. The first half of the boring was even more solidified (fortunately, the second half was re-created afterwards, which is considered to have saved some mistakes).
I actually like the function of chapter talk. For readers, chapter talk gives you a sense of companionship when reading, just like the barrage at station b, it also improves the genuine reading experience of some readers. As an author, I myself usually read many chapters, because I can get feedback in the first time.
However, it must be admitted that the emergence of chapter theory does increase the author’s creative pressure, because if readers are dissatisfied with a paragraph, readers can now complain directly in the chapter theory, and I didn’t even dare to read it during the period when Heifan was written The chapter says.
But looking back now, whether Heifan, Lego or the other copies have taught me a lot.