Volume II Part 3 (1/2)
who promulgate the creed as to ritual and dogma, and the other considerations which have been fully stated. In the meanwhile I venture to think, subject to correction, that, while Black Andy may have exaggerated, or Mr. Manning may have coloured his evidence by Christian terminology, and while mythical accretions on a religious belief are numerous, yet the lowest known human race has attained a religious conception very far above what savages are usually credited with, and has not done so by way of the ”ghost-theory” of the anthropologists. In this creed sacrifice and ghost-wors.h.i.+p are absent.*
It has seemed worth while to devote s.p.a.ce and attention to the Australian beliefs, because the vast continent contains the most archaic and backward of existing races. We may not yet have a sufficient collection of facts microscopically criticised, but the evidence here presented seems deserving of attention. About the still more archaic but extinct Tasmanians and their religion, evidence is too scanty, too casual, and too conflicting for our purpose.**
* These Australian G.o.ds are confusing.
1. Daramulun is supreme among the Coast Murring. J. A. I., ziv. 432-459.
2. Baiame is supreme, Daramulun is an extinct bugbear, among the Wiradthuri. J. A. I., xxv. 298.
3. Baiame is supreme, Daramulun is ”mediator,” among the Kamilaroi. J. A. I., vii. 242.
** See Ling Roth's _Tasmanians_.
CHAPTER XIII. G.o.dS OF THE LOWEST RACES.
Bushmen G.o.ds--Cagn, the gra.s.shopper?--Hottentot G.o.ds--”Wounded knee,” a dead sorcerer--Melanesian G.o.ds--Qat and the spider --Aht and Maori beasts-G.o.ds and men-G.o.ds--Samoan form of animal-G.o.ds--One G.o.d incarnate in many animal shapes--One for each clan--They punish the eating of certain animals.
Pa.s.sing from Australia to Africa, we find few races less advanced than the Bushmen (_Sa-n_, ”settlers,” in Nama). Whatever view may be taken of the past history of the Bushmen of South Africa, it is certain that at present they are a race on a very low level of development. ”Even the Hottentots,” according to Dr. Bleek, ”exceed the Bushmen in civilisation and political organisation”.*
* See Waitz, Anthrop. Nat. Volk, ii. 323-329.
Before investigating the religious myths of the Bushmen, it must be repeated that, as usual, their religion is on a far higher level than their mythology. The conception of invisible or extra-natural powers, which they entertain and express in moments of earnest need, is all unlike the tales which they tell about their own.
Our main authorities at present for Bushman myths are contained in A Brief Account of Bushman Folk-lore, Bleek, London, 1875; and in A Glimpse into the Mythology of the Maluti Bushmen, by Mr. Orpen, Chief Magistrate, St. John's Territory, Cape Monthly Magazine, July, 1874.
Some information may also be gleaned from the South African Folk-lore Journal, 1879-80, G.o.ds, if G.o.ds such mythical beings may be called. Thus Livingstone says: ”On questioning intelligent men among the Bakwains as to their former knowledge of good and evil, of G.o.d and the future state, they have scouted the idea of any of them ever having been without a tolerably clear conception on all these subjects”.* Their ideas of sin were the same as Livingstone's, except about polygamy, and apparently murder. Probably there were other trifling discrepancies. But ”they spoke in the same way of the direct influence exercised by G.o.d in giving rain in answer to the prayers of the rain-makers, and in granting deliverance in times of danger, as they do now, before they ever heard of white men ”. This was to be expected. In short, the religion of savages, in its childlike and hopeful dependence on an invisible friend or friends, in its hope of moving him (or them) by prayer, in its belief that he (or they) ”make for righteousness,” is absolutely human. On the other side, as in the myths of Greece or India, stand the absurd and profane anecdotes of the G.o.ds.
* Missionary Travels, p. 158.
We now turn to a Bushman's account of the religious myths of his tribe.
Shortly after the affair of Langa-libalele, Mr. Orpen had occasion to examine an unknown part of the Maluti range, the highest mountains in South Africa. He engaged a scout named Qing, son of a chief of an almost exterminated clan of hill Bushmen. He was now huntsman to King Nqusha, Morosi's son, on the Orange River, and _had never seen a white man, except fighting_. Thus Qing's evidence could not be much affected by European communications. Mr. Orpen secured the services of Qing, who was a young man and a mighty hunter. By inviting him to explain the wall-pictures in caves, Mr. Orpen led him on to give an account of Cagn, the chief mythical being in Bushman religion. ”Cagn made all things, and we pray to him,” said Qing. ”At first he was very good and nice, but he got spoilt through fighting so many things.” ”The prayer uttered by Qing, 'in a low imploring voice,' ran thus: 'O Cagn, O Cagn, are we not your children? Do you not see our hunger? Give us food.'” Where Cagn is Qing did not know, ”but the elands know. Have you not hunted and heard his cry when the elands suddenly run to his call?”* Now comes in myth.
Cagn has a wife called Coti. ”How came he into the world? Perhaps with those who brought the sun;... only the initiated men of that dance know these things.”**
* Another Bushman prayer, a touching appeal, is given in Alexander's Expedition, ii. 125, and a Khoi-Khoi hymn of prayer is in Hahn, pp. 56, 57.
** Cf. Custom and Myth, pp. 41, 42. It appears that the Bushmen, like the Egyptians and Greeks, hand down myths through esoteric societies, with dramatic mysteries.
Cagn had two sons, Cogaz and Gcwi. He and they were ”great chiefs,” but used stone-pointed digging sticks to grub up edible roots! Cagn's wife brought forth a fawn, and, like Cronus when Rhea presented him with a foal, Cagn was put to it to know the nature and future fortunes of this child of his. To penetrate the future he employed the ordinary native charms and sorcery. The remainder of the myth accounts for the origin of elands and for their inconvenient wildness. A daughter of Cagn's married ”snakes who were also men,” the eternal confusion of savage thought.
These snakes became the people of Cagn. Cagn had a tooth which was ”great medicine”; his force resided in it, and he lent it to people whom he favoured. The birds (as in Odin's case) were his messengers, and brought him news of all that happened at a distance.*
* Compare with the separable vigour of Cagn, residing in his tooth, the European and Egyptian examples of a similar myth--the lock of hair of Minos, the hair of Samson--in introduction to Mrs. Hunt's Grimm's Household Stories, p. lxxv.
He could turn his sandals and clubs into dogs, and set them at his enemies. The baboons were once men, but they offended Cagn, and sang a song with the burden, ”Cagn thinks he is clever”; so he drove them into desolate places, and they are accursed till this day. His strong point was his collection of charms, which, like other Bushmen and Hottentots, he kept ”in his belt”. He could, and did, a.s.sume animal shapes; for example, that of a bull-eland. The thorns were once people, and killed Cagn, and the ants ate him, but his bones were collected and he was revived. It was formerly said that when men died they went to Cagn, but it has been denied by later Bushmen sceptics.
Such is Qing's account of Cagn, and Cagn in myth is plainly but a successful and idealised medicine-man whose charms actually work. Dr.
Bleek identifies his name with that of the mantis insect. This insect is the chief mythological personage of the Bushmen of the western province.
Kaggen his name is written. Dr. Bleek knew of no prayer to the mantis, but was acquainted with addresses to the sun, moon and stars. If Dr.
Bleek's identification is correct, the Cagn of Qing is at once human and a sort of gra.s.shopper, just as Pund-jel was half human, half eagle-hawk.
”The most prominent of the mythological figures,” says Dr. Bleek, speaking of the Bushmen, ”is the mantis.” His proper name is Kaggen, but if we call him Cagn, the interests of science will not seriously suffer.