Part 17 (2/2)
p. xxvii., _dele_ note 3 [[41]]. 'The truth is that, in his account of Oxford and its early days, Mr Hallam quotes John of Salisbury, not as a.s.serting that Vacarius taught there, but as making ”no mention of Oxford at all”; while he gives for the statement about the law school no authority whatever beyond his general reference throughout to Anthony Wood. But the fact is as historical as a fact can well be, and the authority for it is a pa.s.sage in one of the best of the contemporary authors, Gervaise of Canterbury. ”Tunc leges et causidici in Angliam primo vocati sunt,” he says in his account of Theobald in the Acts of the Archbishops, ”quorum primus era{t} magister Vacarius. Hic in Oxonefordia legem docuit.”' E. A. F.
p. x.x.xiii. note [[45]], l. 1, _for_ St Paul's _read_ St Anthony's [[Corrected in reprint.]]
p. x.x.xiv., _for_ sister _read_ brother [[Corrected in reprint. The word ”brother” appears twice on this page: ”brother of Anne Bulleyn” and ”Jane Seymour's brother”.]]
p. xlv. l. 2, _for_ poor _read_ independent. 'Fitz-Stephen says on the parents of St Thomas, ”Neque fnerantibus neque officiose negotiantibus, sed de redditibus suis honorifice viventibus.”' E. A. F. [[Corrected; Footnote 63a]]
p. liii. Thetford. See also p. xli. [[Author's intention unclear. List on page liii shows Thetford grammar school, founded 1328. Page xli text has ”between 1091 and 1119 ... schools at Thetford”.]]
p. lxxix. last line. A Postscript of nine fresh pieces has been since added, on and after p. 349, with 'The Boris hede furst' at p. 264*.
[[Section rewritten for reprint.]]
p. 6, l. 77, _for the note on_ plommys, damsons, _see_ p. 91, _note on l. 177_. [[Note corrected from ”177” to ”77” in reprint; note moved in e-text.]]
p. 7, l. 2 of notes, _for_ Houeshold _read_ Household [[Corrected in reprint.]]
p. 27, l. 418, Areyse. Compare, ”and the Geaunte pulled and drough, but he myght hym not _a-race_ from the sadell.” _Merlin_, Pt. II. p. 346 (E. E. T. Soc. 1866). [[Added to footnote 80.]]
p. 35, note 3 (to l. 521), _for_ end of this volume _read_ p. 145 [[Corrected in reprint.]]
p. 36, l. 536. _Pepper_. ”The third thing is Pepper, a sauce for vplandish folkes: for they mingle Pepper with Beanes and Peason.
Likewise of toasted bread with Ale or Wine, and with Pepper, they make a blacke sauce, as if it were pap, that is called _pepper_, and that they cast vpon theyr meat, flesh and fish.” _Reg. San. Salerni_, p. 67.
[[127a]]
p. 58, l. 851; p. 168, l. 13, 14. Green sauce. There is a herb of an acid taste, the common name for which ... is _green-sauce_ ... not a dozen miles from Stratford-on-Avon. _Notes & Queries_, June 14, 1851, vol. iii. p. 474. ”of Persley leaues stamped withe veriuyce, or white wine, is made a _greene sauce_ to eate with roasted meat ... Sauce for Mutton, Veale and Kid, is _greene sauce_, made in Summer with Vineger or Verjuyce, with a few spices, and without Garlicke. Otherwise with Parsley, white Ginger, and tosted bread with Vineger. In Winter, the same sawces are made with many spices, and little quant.i.ty of Garlicke, and of the best Wine, and with a little Verjuyce, or with Mustard.”
_Reg. San. Salerni_, p. 67-8. [[Added to note 237.]]
p. 62, l. 909, ? _perhaps a comma should go after _hed_, and _'his cloak or cape'_ as a side-note. But see _cappe, p. 65, l. 964. [[242a]]
p. 66, l. 969. Dogs. The nuisance that the number of Dogs must have been may be judged of by the following payments in the Church-Wardens'
Accounts of St Margaret's, Westminster, in _Nichols_, p. 34-5.
1625 Item paid to the dog-killer for killing of dogs 0. 9. 8.
1625 Item paid to the dog-killer more for killing 14 dozen and 10 dogs in time of visitacion 1. 9. 8.
1625 Item paid to the dog-killer for killing of 24 dozen of dogs 1. 8.
See the old French satire on the Lady and her Dogs, in _Rel. Ant._ i.
155. [[250a]]
p. 67, last line of note, _for_ Hoss _read_ Hog's [[Corrected in reprint]]
p. 71, side-note 12, _for_ King's _read_ chief [[Corrected in reprint]]
p. 84, note to l. 51. Chipping or paring bread. ”_Non comedas crustam, colorem quia gignit adustam_ ... the Authour in this Text warneth vs, to beware of crusts eating, because they ingender a-dust cholor, or melancholly humours, by reason that they bee burned and dry. And therefore great estates the which be [_orig._ the] chollerick of nature, cause the crustes aboue and beneath to be chipped away; wherfore the pith or crumme should be chosen, the which is of a greater nourishment then the crust.” _Regimen Sanitatis Salerni_, ed. 1634, p. 71. Fr.
<script>