Part 9 (1/2)
”But morphine is a form of opium, is it not?”
”Yes. It is one of the alkaloids.”
”Now, Doctor, one more question. You have testified that you attended this girl in her last illness; as a physician you are familiar with death from diphtheria; you have stated what are the symptoms of morphine, or opium poisoning, and that you observed them in this case; further, that an identical set of symptoms would not occur in any other disease known to you; now, from these facts, what would you say caused the death of Miss Mabel Sloane?”
”I should say that she died of a poisonous dose of some form of opium, probably morphine.”
”You may take the witness,” said Mr. Munson, as he sat down. Mr. Bliss spoke a word to Doctor Medjora, and then holding a few slips of paper, upon which were notes, mainly suggestions which had been written by the prisoner himself, and pa.s.sed to his counsel unperceived by the majority of those present, he faced the witness, whose eyes at once sought the floor.
”Doctor,” began Mr. Bliss, ”you have stated that you are only slightly acquainted with Dr. Medjora. Is that true?”
”I said that I was only slightly acquainted with him prior to my being called to attend Miss Sloane. Of course I know him better now.”
”But before the time which you specify, you did not know him?”
”Not intimately.”
”Oh! Not intimately? Then you did know him? Now is it not a fact that you and Dr. Medjora were enemies?”
”I object!” exclaimed Mr. Munson.
”I wish to show, your Honor,” said Mr. Bliss, ”that this witness has harbored a personal spite against our client, and that because of that, his mind was not in a condition to evolve an unprejudiced opinion about the illness of Miss Sloane.”
”I do not think that is at all competent, your Honor,” said Mr.
Munson. ”The witness has testified to facts, and even if there were personal feeling, that would not alter facts.”
”No, your Honor,” said Mr. Bliss, quickly, ”facts are immutable. But a prejudiced mind is as an eye that looks through a colored gla.s.s. All that is observed is distorted by the mental state.”
”The witness may answer,” said the Recorder.
At the request of Mr. Bliss the stenographer read the question aloud, and the witness replied.
”Dr. Medjora and myself were not enemies. Certainly not!”
”Had you not had a controversy with him upon a professional point?”
”I had an argument with him, in a debate, just as occurs in all debates.”
”Precisely! But was not this argument, as you term it, a discussion which followed a paper which you had read, and in that argument did not Dr. Medjora prove that the whole treatment outlined by you was erroneous, unscientific, and unsound?”
”He did not prove it; he claimed something of the kind!”
”You say he did not prove it. As a result of his argument, was not your paper refused publication by a leading medical journal?”
”I did not offer it for publication.”
”I think this is all incompetent, your Honor,” said Mr. Munson.
”You may go on,” said the Recorder, nodding to Mr. Bliss.