Part 3 (1/2)

So sovereign a good do I, for my part, esteem it to be loved, that I do verily believe spontaneous blessings are outpoured from G.o.ds and men on one so favoured.

This is that choice possession which, beyond all others, the monarch is deprived of.

But if you require further evidence that what I say is true, look at the matter thus: No friends.h.i.+p, I presume, is sounder than that which binds parents to their children and children to their parents, brothers and sisters to each other, (9) wives to husbands, comrade to comrade.

(9) Or, ”brothers to brothers.”

If, then, you will but thoughtfully consider it, you will discover it is the ordinary person who is chiefly blest in these relations. (10) While of tyrants, many have been murderers of their own children, many by their children murdered. Many brothers have been murderers of one another in contest for the crown; (11) many a monarch has been done to death by the wife of his bosom, (12) or even by his own familiar friend, by him of whose affection he was proudest. (13)

(10) Or, ”that these more obvious affections are the sanct.i.ties of private life.”

(11) Or, ”have caught at the throats of brothers”; lit. ”been slain with mutually-murderous hand.” Cf. Pind. Fr. 137; Aesch. ”Sept. c.

Theb.” 931; ”Ag.” 1575, concerning Eteocles and Polynices.

(12) See Grote, ”H. G.” xi. 288, xii. 6; ”h.e.l.l.” VI. iv. 36; Isocr.

”On the Peace,” 182; Plut. ”Dem. Pol.” iii. (Clough, v. p. 98); Tac. ”Hist.” v. 8, about the family feuds of the kings of Judaea.

(13) ”It was his own familiar friend who dealt the blow, the nearest and dearest to his heart.”

How can you suppose, then, that being so hated by those whom nature predisposes and law compels to love him, the tyrant should be loved by any living soul beside?

IV

Again, without some moiety of faith and trust, (1) how can a man not feel to be defrauded of a mighty blessing? One may well ask: What fellows.h.i.+p, what converse, what society would be agreeable without confidence? What intercourse between man and wife be sweet apart from trustfulness? How should the ”faithful esquire” whose faith is mistrusted still be lief and dear? (2)

(1) ”How can he, whose faith's discredited, the moral bankrupt...”

(2) Or, ”the trusty knight and serving-man.” Cf. ”Morte d'Arthur,”

xxi. 5, King Arthur and Sir Bedivere.

Well, then, of this frank confidence in others the tyrant has the scantiest share. (3) Seeing his life is such, he cannot even trust his meats and drinks, but he must bid his serving-men before the feast begins, or ever the libation to the G.o.ds is poured, (4) to taste the viands, out of sheer mistrust there may be mischief lurking in the cup or platter. (5)

(3) Or, ”from this... is almost absolutely debarred.”

(4) ”Or ever grace is said.”

(5) Cf. ”Cyrop.” I. iii. 4.

Once more, the rest of mankind find in their fatherland a treasure worth all else beside. The citizens form their own body-guard (6) without pay or service-money against slaves and against evil-doers. It is theirs to see that none of themselves, no citizen, shall perish by a violent death. And they have advanced so far along the path of guardians.h.i.+p (7) that in many cases they have framed a law to the effect that ”not the a.s.sociate even of one who is blood-guilty shall be accounted pure.” So that, by reason of their fatherland, (8) each several citizen can live at quiet and secure.

(6) ”Are their own 'satellites,' spear-bearers.” Cf. Thuc. i. 130; Herod. ii. 168; vii. 127.

(7) ”Pushed so far the principle of mutual self-aid.”

(8) ”Thanks to the blessing of a fatherland each citizen may spend his days in peace and safety.”

But for the tyrant it is again exactly the reverse. (9) Instead of aiding or avenging their despotic lord, cities bestow large honours on the slayer of a tyrant; ay, and in lieu of excommunicating the tyrannicide from sacred shrines, (10) as is the case with murderers of private citizens, they set up statues of the doers of such deeds (11) in temples.