Part 33 (1/2)

”Now gelatine treated in this way-chromicized gelatine, as it is called-has a very peculiar property. Ordinary gelatine, as is well known, is easily dissolved in hot water, and chromicized gelatine is also soluble in hot water as long as it is not exposed to light; but on being exposed to light, it undergoes a change and is no longer capable of being dissolved in hot water. Now the plate of chromicized gelatine under the negative is protected from the light by the opaque parts of the negative, whereas the light pa.s.ses freely through the transparent parts; but the transparent parts of the negative correspond to the black marks on the finger-print, and these correspond to the ridges on the finger. Hence it follows that the gelatine plate is acted upon by light only on the parts corresponding to the ridges; and in these parts the gelatine is rendered insoluble, while all the rest of the gelatine is soluble. The gelatine plate, which is cemented to a thin plate of metal for support, is now carefully washed with hot water, by which the soluble part of the gelatine is dissolved away leaving the insoluble part (corresponding to the ridges) standing up from the surface. Thus there is produced a facsimile in relief of the finger-print having actual ridges and furrows identical in character with the ridges and furrows of the finger-tip. If an inked roller is pa.s.sed over this relief, or if the relief is pressed lightly on an inked slab, and then pressed on a sheet of paper, a finger-print will be produced which will be absolutely identical with the original, even to the little white spots which mark the orifices of the sweat glands. It will be impossible to discover any difference between the real finger-print and the counterfeit because, in fact, no difference exists.”

”But surely the process you have described is a very difficult and intricate one?”

”Not at all; it is very little more difficult than ordinary carbon printing, which is practised successfully by numbers of amateurs. Moreover, such a relief as I have described-which is practically nothing more than an ordinary process block-could be produced by any photo-engraver. The process that I have described is, in all essentials, that which is used in the reproduction of pen-and-ink drawings, and any of the hundreds of workmen who are employed in that industry could make a relief-block of a finger-print, with which an undetectable forgery could be executed.”

”You have a.s.serted that the counterfeit finger-print could not be distinguished from the original. Are you prepared to furnish proof that this is the case?”

”Yes. I am prepared to execute a counterfeit of the prisoner's thumb-print in the presence of the Court.”

”And do you say that such a counterfeit would be indistinguishable from the original, even by the experts?”

”I do.”

Anstey turned towards the judge. ”Would your lords.h.i.+p give your permission for a demonstration such as the witness proposes?”

”Certainly,” replied the judge. ”The evidence is highly material. How do you propose that the comparison should be made?” he added, addressing Thornd.y.k.e.

”I have brought, for the purpose, my lord,” answered Thornd.y.k.e, ”some sheets of paper, each of which is ruled into twenty numbered squares. I propose to make on ten of the squares counterfeits of the prisoner's thumb-mark, and to fill the remaining ten with real thumb-marks. I propose that the experts should then examine the paper and tell the Court which are the real thumb-prints and which are the false.”

”That seems a fair and efficient test,” said his lords.h.i.+p. ”Have you any objection to offer, Sir Hector?”

Sir Hector Trumpler hastily consulted with the two experts, who were sitting in the attorney's bench, and then replied, without much enthusiasm-

”We have no objection to offer, my lord.”

”Then, in that case, I shall direct the expert witnesses to withdraw from the court while the prints are being made.”

In obedience to the judge's order, Mr. Singleton and his colleague rose and left the court with evident reluctance, while Thornd.y.k.e took from a small portfolio three sheets of paper which he handed up to the judge.

”If your lords.h.i.+p,” said he, ”will make marks in ten of the squares on two of these sheets, one can be given to the jury and one retained by your lords.h.i.+p to check the third sheet when the prints are made on it.”

”That is an excellent plan,” said the judge; ”and, as the information is for myself and the jury, it would be better if you came up and performed the actual stamping on my table in the presence of the foreman of the jury and the counsel for the prosecution and defence.”

In accordance with the judge's direction Thornd.y.k.e stepped up on the dais, and Anstey, as he rose to follow, leaned over towards me.

”You and Polton had better go up too,” said he: ”Thornd.y.k.e will want your a.s.sistance, and you may as well see the fun. I will explain to his lords.h.i.+p.”

He ascended the stairs leading to the dais and addressed a few words to the judge, who glanced in our direction and nodded, whereupon we both gleefully followed our counsel, Polton carrying the box and beaming with delight.

The judge's table was provided with a shallow drawer which pulled out at the side and which accommodated the box comfortably, leaving the small table-top free for the papers. When the lid of the box was raised, there were displayed a copper inking-slab, a small roller and the twenty-four ”p.a.w.ns” which had so puzzled Polton, and on which he now gazed with a twinkle of amus.e.m.e.nt and triumph.

”Are those all stamps?” inquired the judge, glancing curiously at the array of turned-wood handles.

”They are all stamps, my lord,” replied Thornd.y.k.e, ”and each is taken from a different impression of the prisoner's thumb.”

”But why so many?” asked the judge.

”I have multiplied them,” answered Thornd.y.k.e, as he squeezed out a drop of finger-print ink on to the slab and proceeded to roll it out into a thin film, ”to avoid the tell-tale uniformity of a single stamp. And I may say,” he added, ”that it is highly important that the experts should not be informed that more than one stamp has been used.”

”Yes, I see that,” said the judge. ”You understand that, Sir Hector,” he added, addressing the counsel, who bowed stiffly, clearly regarding the entire proceeding with extreme disfavour.