Part 26 (1/2)
PROGRAMME OF SOCIAL EVENTS
MONDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 19.--Grand Fete night in honor of the Congress of Arts and Science. Special illuminations about the Grand Basin. Lagoon fete.
Banquet by the St. Louis Chemical Society, at the Southern Hotel, to the members of the Chemical Sections.
TUESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 20.--General Reception by Board of Lady Managers to the officers and speakers of the Congress and officials of the Exposition.
WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON, SEPTEMBER 21.--Garden fete to be given to the members of the Congress of Arts and Science, at the French Pavilion, by the Commissioner-General from France.
WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 21.--General reception by the German Imperial Commissioner-General to the members of the Congress of Arts and Science, at the German State House.
THURSDAY EVENING.--Shaw banquet at the Buckingham Club to the foreign delegates.
FRIDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 23.--General banquet to the speakers and officials of the Congress of Arts and Science in the banquet hall of the Tyrolean Alps. 8 P. M.
SAt.u.r.dAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 24.--Banquet at St. Louis Club by Round Table of St. Louis, to the foreign members of the Congress.
Banquet given by Imperial Commissioner-General from j.a.pan to the j.a.panese delegation to the Congress and Exposition officials.
Dinner given by Commissioner-General from Great Britain to the English members of the Congress.
ALPHABETICAL LIST OF MEMBERS WHO MADE 10-MINUTE ADDRESSES
The following list differs from the original programme, in that it contains the names only of those who actually read addresses. It was planned that each Section should meet for three hours. When authors of ten-minute papers were not present, and where not enough of these shorter papers were offered to fill out the time, the Chairmen invited discussions from the floor until the time was filled.
Professor R. G. Aitken Lick Observatory Astronomy James W. Alexander, Esq. New York City Insurance Frederick Almy Buffalo, N. Y. Social Science Professor S. G. Ashmore Union College Latin Language Professor L. A. Bauer Carnegie Inst.i.tute Cosmical Physics Dr. Marcus Benjamin National Museum Technical Chemistry Professor H. T. Blickfeldt Leland Stanford Univ. Geometry Professor Ernest W. Brown Haverford College Lunar Theory Dr. Henry d.i.c.kson Bruns New Orleans Munic.i.p.al Administration Dr. F. K. Cameron Dep't of Agriculture Physical Chemistry Rear-Admiral C. M. Chester, United States Naval Astronomy U. S. N. Observatory H. H. Clayton, Esq. Blue Hill Observatory Cosmical Physics Professor Charles A. Coffin New York City Modern Painting Dr. George Coronilas Athens, Greece Tuberculosis Professor J. E. Denton Stevens Inst.i.tute Mechanical Engineering Professor L. W. Dowling Univ. of Wisconsin Geometry Professor H. C. Elmer Cornell Univ. Latin Language Professor A. Emch Univ. of Colorado Geometry Professor H. R. Fanclough Leland Stanford Univ. Cla.s.sical Literature Professor W. S. Ferguson Univ. of California History of Greece, Rome, and Asia Dr. Carlos Finley Havana Pathology Dr. C. E. Fisk Centralia, Ill. History of America Homer Folks, Esq. New York City Social Science Professor F. C. French Univ. of Nebraska Philosophy of Religion H. L. Gannt, Esq. Schenectady, N. Y. Mechanical Engineering Dr. F. P. Gorham Brown Univ. Bacteriology Professor Evarts B. Greene Univ. of Illinois History of America Stansbury Hagar, Esq. Brooklyn, N.Y. Ethnology J. D. Hague, Esq. New York City Mining Engineering Professor G. B. Halstead Kenyon College Geometry Professor A. D. F. Hamlin Columbia Univ. aesthetics Professor H. Hanc.o.c.k Univ. of Cincinnati Geometry Professor J. A. Harris St. Louis, Mo. Plant Morphology Professor M. W. Haskell Univ. of California Algebra and a.n.a.lysis Professor J. T. Hatfield Northwestern Univ. Germanic Language Professor E. C. Hayes Miami Univ. Social Psychology Professor W. E. Heidel Iowa College Greek Language Dr. C. L. Herrick Granville, Ohio Neurology Dr. C. Judson Herrick Granville, Ohio Animal Morphology Professor W. H. Hobbs Univ. of Wisconsin Petrology and Mineralogy Professor A. R. Hohlfeld Univ. of Wisconsin Germanic Literature Professor H. H. Horne Dartmouth College Educational Theory Dr. E. V. Huntington Harvard Univ. Algebra and a.n.a.lysis Dr. Reid Hunt U. S. Marine Hospital Alcohol, etc.
Dr. J. N. Hurty Indianapolis, Ind. Public Health Professor J. J. Hutchinson Cornell Univ. Algebra and a.n.a.lysis Rev. Thomas E. Judge Catholic Review of General Religious Reviews Education Professor L. Kahlenburg Univ. of Wisconsin Physical Chemistry Professor Albert G. Keller Yale University Munic.i.p.al Administration Professor George Lefevre Univ. of Missouri Comparative Anatomy President Henry C. King Oberlin College Education, The College Dr. Ira Landrith Belmont College Religious Agencies Professor M. D. Learned Univ. of Pennsylvania Germanic Literature Professor A. O. LeuschnerUniv. of California Astronomy Dr. E. P. Lyon St. Louis Univ. Physiology Dr. Duncan B. Macdonald Hartford Theological Semitic Languages Seminary Professor A. MacFarlane Chatham, Ontario Applied Mathematics Professor James McMahon Cornell Univ. Applied Mathematics Mr. Edward Mallinckrodt St. Louis, Mo. Chemistry Professor H. P. Manning Brown Univ. Geometry Professor G. A. Miller Leland Stanford Univ. Algebra and a.n.a.lysis.
Dr. W. C. Mills Ohio State Univ. Archaeology Professor W. S. Milner Univ. of Toronto Cla.s.sical Literature Professor F. G. Moore Dartmouth College Cla.s.sical Literature Dr. W. P. Montague Columbia Univ. Metaphysics Clarence B. Moore, Esq. Philadelphia Archaeology.
Professor F. R. Moulton Univ. of Chicago Astronomy.
Dr. J. G. Needham Lake Forest Univ. Animal Morphology Professor Alex. T. Ormond Princeton Univ. Philosophy of Religion Professor Frederic L. Paxton Univ. of Colorado History of America Dr. Carl Pfister St. Mark's Hospital, Surgery New York City Professor M. B. Porter Univ. of Texas Algebra and a.n.a.lysis Dr. A. J. Reynolds Chicago Public Health Professor S. P. Sadtler Philadelphia College Technical Chemistry of Pharmacy Dr. John A. Sampson Albany, N. Y. Gynaecology Oswald Schreiner, Esq. U. S. Dep't of Chemistry Agriculture Rev. Frank Sewall Was.h.i.+ngton, D. C. Social Science, The Family Professor H. C. Sheldon Boston Univ. History of the Christian Church Professor Frank C. Sharp Univ. of Wisconsin Ethics Professor J. B. Shaw Milliken Univ. Algebra and a.n.a.lysis Professor W. B. Smith Tulane Univ. New Testament Professor Marshall S. Snow Was.h.i.+ngton Univ History of America Professor Henry Snyder Univ. of Minnesota Social Science Professor Edwain D. Starbuck Earlham College General Religious Professor George B. Stewart Auburn Theological Professional Seminary Religious Education John M. Stahl Quincy, Ill. The Rural Community Professor J. Stieglitz Univ. of Chicago Chemistry Professor Robert Stein U. S. Geological Survey Comparative Language Mr. Teitaro Suzuki La Salle, Ill. Brahmanism and Buddhism Col. T. W. Symonds, U. S. A. Was.h.i.+ngton, D. C. Civil Engineering Professor Teissier Lyons, France Pathology Judge W. H. Thomas Montgomery, Ala. Private Law Professor O. H. t.i.ttmann U. S. C. and G. Survey Astronomy Professor Alfred M. Tozzer Peabody Museum Anthropology Dr. Benjamin F. Trueblood Univ. of Missouri Medieval History Professor Clyde W. Votaw Univ. of Chicago New Testament Professor John B. Watson Univ. of Chicago Psychology Professor H. L. Willett Disciples Divinity Professional House, Chicago Religious Education President Mary E. Woolley Mt. Holyoke College Education, The College H. Zwaarddemaker Utrecht Otology and Laryngology
THE SCIENTIFIC PLAN OF THE CONGRESS
BY PROF. HUGO MuNSTERBERG
I
THE PURPOSE OF THE CONGRESS
1. _The Centralization of the Congress_
The history of the Congress has been told. It remains to set forth the principles which controlled the work of the Congress week, and thus scientifically to introduce the scholarly undertaking, the results of which are to speak for themselves in the eight volumes of this publication. Yet in a certain way this scientific introduction has once more to use the language of history. It does not deal with the external development of the Congress, and the story which it has to tell is thus not one of dates and names and events. But the principles which shaped the whole undertaking have themselves a claim to historical treatment; they do not lie before us simply as the subject for a logical disputation or as a plea for a future work. That was the situation of three years ago. At that time various ideas and opposing principles entered into the arena of discussion; but now, since the work is completed, the question can be only of what principles, right or wrong, have really determined the programme. We have thus to interpret that state of mind out of which the purposes and the scientific arrangement of the Congress resulted; and no after-thought of to-day would be a desirable addition. Whatever possible improvements of the plan may suggest themselves in the retrospect can be given only a closing word.
It was certainly easy to learn from experience, but first the experience had to be pa.s.sed through. We have here to interpret the view from that standpoint from which the experience of the Congress was still a matter of the future, and of an uncertain future indeed, full of doubts and fears, and yet full of hopes and possibilities.