Part 11 (1/2)

[41] To Hippolytus and the writers of his period, Dorner ascribes the latter, preponderantly over the fores their vieith Sabellianiseschichte der Lehre von der Person Christi,” I p 611, _seq_

[42] ”Tert adv Prax,” c 3

[43] Euseb H E, V 28

[44] See Adolph Schliemann's ”Clementinen, nebst den verwandten Schriften und der Ebionitismus,” Cap III ii ---- 8, 9

[45] M Bunsen must have so to ”the whole school of Tubingen” the opinion ”that the fourth Gospel ritten about the year 165 or 170” (I v) We cannot call to ler uses various expressions to”about the middle of the second century” (Nachapost Zeitalter, II 354, and Montanisists and Irenaeus”

(II 369); ”previous to the last third of the second century” (II 348); ”in the second quarter of the second century” (II 345) Zeller also fixes on the year 150 as the time when the Gospel may probably have first appeared (Zeller's Jahrb, 1845, p 646)

[46] The earliest testiia, preserved in the ”Paschal Chronicle,” probably about A D

170-175

[47] We will give, from this very section on Basilides, and its subsequent recapitulation, three exaular ular verb with plural subject expressed; (_b_) of plural verb with singular subject expressed; (_c_) of the ular and plural subjects in the sas indeterminately to either

(_a_) ?d?e? ??? p?? ?atafa??? ?as??e?d?? ??? ?a? ?s?d???? ?a? pa? ?

t??t?? ?????, ??? ?p??? ?ata?e?deta? ???? ?at?a???, a??a ?a? ?a? t??

S?t???? a?t?? ??, f?s??, ?te ?? ??de?, ? t ?--p 230

(_b_) ?as??e?d?? de ?a? a?t?? ?e?e? e??a? ?e?? ??? ??ta, pep???e???

??s?? e? ??? ??t??,? ?? ??? ta?? e??? e? ?a?t? t?? t?? ???at??

p??????? p?????, ?a? t??t? e??a? fas? t? t?? ??s?? spe?a, ? t

?--p 320

(_c_) ?a? ded???e ta? ?ata p?????? t?? ?e????t?? ??s?a? ? ?as??e?d??

a??a e?pe, f?s?, ?a? e?e?et?, ?a? t??t? est?? ? ?e???s?? ?? a?d?e?

??t??, t? ?e??e? ?p? ??se??, ”Ge????t? f??, ?a? e?e?et? f??” ???e?, f?s?, ?e???e t? f??;Ge???e, f?s??, e? ??? ??t?? t? spe?a t??

??s??, ? ????? ? ?e??e?? ?e????t? f??, ?a? t??t?, f?s??, est? t?

?e??e??? e? t??? ??a??e????? ”?? t? f?? t? a???????, ? f?t??e? pa?ta a????p?? e???e??? e?? t?? ??s??”--p 232 Now can any one decide whether this coht,”

with its applications to John i 9, proceeds froe 528

[49] Euseb H E, V 28

[50] ”Philosophumena,” p 258

[51] Iren Lib II c 39

[52] I p 341

[53] The words of the author of the ”Philosophumena” are these: ???t??