Part 5 (1/2)

In the last chapter I observed that in dealing with our second point--the ornamental treatment that is fit for a garden--we should be brought into contact with the good and bad points of both the old and new systems of gardening. Hence the following discursus upon the historic English garden, which will, however, be as short as it can well be made, not only because the writer has no desire to wander on a far errand when his interest lies near home, but also because an essay, such as this, is ever bound to be an inconclusive affair; and 'twere a pity to lay a heavy burden upon a light horse!

At the outset of this section of our enquiry it is well to realise that there is little known about the garden of earlier date than the middle of the sixteenth century. Our knowledge of the mediaeval garden is only to be acquired piecemeal, out of casual references in old chronicles, and stray pictures in illuminated ma.n.u.scripts, and in each case allowance must be made for the fluent fancy of the artist. Moreover, early notices of gardens deal mostly with the orchard, or the vegetable or herb garden, where flowers grown for ornament occur in the borders of the ground.

It is natural to ascribe the first rudiments of horticultural science in this country to the Romans; and with the cla.s.sic pastorals, or Pliny the Younger's Letter to Apollinaris before us, in which an elaborate garden is minutely and enthusiastically described, we need no further a.s.surance of the fitness of the Roman to impart skilled knowledge in all branches of the science.

Loudon, in his n.o.ble ”Arboretum et fruticetum Britannic.u.m,” enters at large into the question of what trees and shrubs are indigenous to Britain, and gives the probable dates of the introduction of such as are not native to this country. According to Whitaker, whose authority Loudon adopts, it would appear that the Romans brought us the plane, the box, the elm, the poplar, and the chestnut. (The lime, he adds, was not generally planted here till after the time of Le Notre: it was used extensively in avenues planted here in the reign of Charles the Second.) Of fruit trees, the Roman gave us the pear, the fig, the damson, cherry, peach, apricot, and quince. The aboriginal trees known to our first ancestors are the birch, alder, oak, wild or Scotch pine, mountain-ash or rowan-tree, the juniper, elder, sweet-gale, dog-rose, heath, St John's wort, and the mistletoe.

Authorities agree in ascribing the introduction of many other plants, fruit trees, and trees of ornament or curiosity now common throughout England, to the monks. And the extent of our indebtedness to the monks in this matter may be gathered from the fact that monasteries abounded here in early times; and the religious orders have in all times been enthusiastic gardeners. Further be it remembered, many of the inmates of our monasteries were either foreigners or persons who had been educated in Italy or France, who would be well able to keep this country supplied with specimens and with reminiscences of the styles of foreign gardens up to date.

The most valuable authority on the subject of early English gardens is Alexander Necham, Abbot of Cirencester (1157-1217). His references are in the shape of notes from a commonplace-book ent.i.tled ”Of the Nature of Things,” and he writes thus: ”Here the gardens should be adorned with roses and lilies, the turnsole (heliotrope), violets and mandrake; there you should have parsley, cost, fennel, southern-wood, coriander, sage, savery, hyssop, mint, rue, dittany, smallage, pellitory, lettuces, garden-cress, and peonies.... A n.o.ble garden will give thee also medlars, quinces, warden-trees, peaches, pears of St Riole, pomegranates, lemons, oranges, almonds, dates, which are the fruits of palms, figs, &c.”[15] Here, in truth, is a delightful medley of the useful and the beautiful, just like life! Yet the very use of the term ”n.o.ble,” as applied to a garden, implies that even the thirteenth-century Englishman had a standard of excellence to stir ambition. Other garden flowers mentioned in Alexander's observations are the sunflower, the iris and narcissus.

[Footnote 15: See ”The Praise of Gardens.”]

The garden described by Necham bespeaks an amount of taste in the arrangement of the herbs, plants, and fruit-trees, but in the main it corresponds with our kitchen-garden. The next English writer upon gardens in point of date is Johannes de Garlandia, an English resident in France; but here is a description of the writer's garden at Paris.

The ground here described consists of shrubbery, wood, grove, and garden, and from the account given it is inferred that both in matters of taste and in the horticultural and floral products of the garden, France had advanced farther than England in garden-craft in the fourteenth century, which is the date of the book.

In Mr Hudson Turner's ”Observations on the State of Horticulture in England”[16] in olden times he gives notices of the early dates in which the rose was under cultivation. In the thirteenth century King John sends a wreath of roses to his lady-love. Chronicles inform us that roses and lilies were among the plants bought for the Royal Garden at Westminster in 1276; and the annual rendering of a rose is one of the commonest species of quit-rent in ancient conveyances, like the ”pepper-corn” of later times. The extent to which the culture of the rose was carried is inferred from the number of sorts mentioned in old books, which include the red, the sweet-musk, double and single, the damask, the velvet, the double-double Provence rose, and the double and single white rose. And the demand for roses seems to have been so great in old days that bushels of them frequently served as the payment of va.s.sals to their lords, both in France and England. England has good reason to remember the distinction between the red and the white rose.

[Footnote 16: ”Archaeological Journal,” vol. v. p. 295.]

Of all the flowers known to our ancestors, the gilly-flower was perhaps the most common.

”The fairest flowers o' the season Are our carnations and streak'd gilly flower.”

_Winter's Tale._

”Their use,” says a quaint writer, ”is much in ornament, and comforting the spirites by the sence of smelling.” The variety of this flower, that was best known in early times, was the wall gilly-flower, or bee-flower.

Another flower of common growth in mediaeval gardens and orchards is the periwinkle.

”There sprang the violet all newe, And fresh periwinkle, rich of hewe, And flowers yellow, white and rede, Such plenty grew there nor in the mede.”

It is not considered probable that much art was expended in the laying out of gardens before the fifteenth century; but I give a list of illuminated MSS. in the Library of the British Museum, where may be found ill.u.s.trations of gardens, and which I take from Messrs Birch and Jenner's valuable Dictionary of Princ.i.p.al Subjects in the British Museum[17] under the head of Garden.

[Footnote 17: ”Early Drawings and Illuminations.” Birch and Jenner.

(Bagster, 1879, p. 134.)

”Gardens.

19 D. i. ff. I. etc.

20 A. xvii. f. 7b.

20 B. ii. f. 57.

14 803 f. 63.

18 851 f. 182.

18 852 f. 3. b.

26667 f. i.

Harl. 4425. f. 12. b.

Kings 7. f. 57.

6 E. ix. f. 15. b.

14 E. vi. f. 146.