Part 18 (1/2)

Appendix C.

1. ”Sappho flourished b. c. 600, and a little later; and so highly did Plato value her intellectual, as well as her imaginative endowments, that he a.s.signed her the honors of sage as well as poet; and familiarly ent.i.tled her the 'tenth muse'”--Buckle,

2. ”Wilkinson says among _no_ ancient people had women such influence and liberty as among the ancient Egyptians.”--Buckle.

3. ”The Americans have in the treatment of women fallen below, not only their own democratic principles, but the practice of some parts of the Old World.”--Harriet Martineau.

4. ”Mr. F. Newman denies that Christianity has improved the position of women; and he observes that, 'with Paul, the _sole_ reason for marriage is, that a man may, without sin, vent his sensual desires. He teaches that, _but_ for this object, it would be better not to marry;' and he takes no notice of the _social_ pleasures of marriage. Newman says: 'In short, only in countries where Germanic sentiment has taken root do we see marks of any elevation of the female s.e.x superior to that of Pagan antiquity.'”--Buckle.

5. ”Female voices are never heard in the Russian churches; their place is supplied by boys; women do not yet stand high enough in the estimation of the churches.... to be permitted to sing the praises of G.o.d in the presence of men.”--Kohl.

6. ”Christianity diminished the influence of women.”--Neander, ”Hist, of the Church.”

Appendix D.

Within the reign of the present sovereign Mrs. Gage tells us of a young girl being ordered by the Petty Sessions Bench back to the ”service” of a landlord, from whom she had run away because such service meant the sacrifice of her honor. She refused to go _and was put in jail_.

Appendix E.

1. ”Women were taught by the Church and State alike, that the Feudal Lord or Seigneur had a right to them, not only against themselves, but as against any claim of husband or father. The law known as _Marchetta_, or Marquette, compelled newly-married women to a most dishonorable servitude. They were regarded as the rightful prey of the Feudal Lord from one to three days after their marriage, and from this custom, the oldest son of the serf was held as the son of the lord, 'as perchance it was he who begat him.' From this nefarious degradation of woman, the custom of Borough-English arose, in which the youngest son became the heir.... France, Germany, Prussia, England, Scotland, _and all Christian countries_ where feudalism existed, held to the enforcement of Marquette. The lord deemed this right as fully his as he did the claim to half the crops of the land, or to half the wool of the sheep. More than one reign of terror arose in France from the enforcement of this law, and the uprisings of the peasantry over Europe during the _twelfth century_, and the fierce Jacquerie, or Peasant Wars, of the _fourteenth century_ in France owed their origin, among other causes, to the enforcement of these claims by the lords upon the newly-married wife.

The edicts of Marly transplanted that claim to America when Canada was under the control of France. To persons not conversant with the history of feudalism, and of the Church for the first fifteen hundred years of its existence, it will seem impossible that such foulness could ever have been part of Christian civilization. That the crimes they have been trained to consider the worst forms of heathendom could have existed in Christian Europe, _upheld by both Church and State_ for more than a thousand five hundred years, will strike most people with incredulity.

Such, however, is the truth; we can but admit well-attested facts of history, how severe a blow soever they strike our preconceived beliefs.

”Marquette was claimed by the Lords Spiritual,* as well as by the Lords Temporal. _The Church indeed, was the bulwark of this base feudal claim_. With the power of penance and excommunication in its grasp, this demand could neither have originated nor been sustained unless sanctioned by the Church.... These customs of feudalism were the customs of Christianity during many centuries. (One of the Earls of Crawford, known as the 'Earl Brant,' in the _sixteenth_ century, was probably among the last who openly claimed by right the literal translation of _droit de Jambage_.) These infamous outrages upon woman were enforced under Christian law by both Church and State.

* ”In days to come people will be slow to believe that the law among _Christian nations went beyond anything decreed_ concerning the olden slavery; that it wrote down as an actual right the most grievous outrage that could ever wound _man's_ heart. The Lords Spiritual (clergy) had this right no less than the Lords Temporal. The _parson_, being a lord, _expressly claimed the first fruits of the bride, but was willing to sell_ his right to the husband. The Courts of Berne openly maintain that this right grew up naturally.”-- Michelet, ”La Sorcerie,” p.62

”The degradation of the _husband_ at this infringement of the lord spiritual and temporal upon his marital right, has been pictured by many writers, but history has been quite silent upon the despair and shame of the wife. No hope appeared for woman anywhere. The Church....

dragged her to the lowest depths, through the vileness of its priestly customs.... We who talk of the burning of wives upon the funeral pyres of husbands in India, may well turn our eyes to the records of Christian countries.”--Matilda Joslyn Gage in ”Woman, Church, and State.”

2. From this point Mrs. Gage calls attention to the various efforts to throw off this degrading custom. The women held meetings at night, and among other things travestied the celebration of Ma.s.s and other Church customs; but the end and aim of these meetings being a protest and rebellion against Marquette, the clergy called those who took part in them ”witches;”* and then and there began the persecution which the Church carried on against women under this disguise (under Catholic and Protestant rule alike), which extended down to the latter part of the last century, with its list of horrors and indignities extending over all Christian countries and blossoming in all their vigor in our own eastern States, upheld by Luther, John Wesley, and Baxter, who unfortunately had not at that time entered into the everlasting rest of the Saints. And, true to these n.o.ble and wise leaders, the Churches which they founded are to-day expressing the same sentiments (in principle) in regard to the honor and dignity and position of woman.

The arguments of the Rev. Dr. Craven, the prosecutor in the famous Presbyterian trial of 1876, which are given by Mrs. Gage, together with numerous other similar ones, fully establish the fact that woman is to the Church what she always was--_so far as secular law will permit._ And numerous instances (such as the Buckley exhibition at the last Methodist Conference, in which he was sustained by the Conference) prove that they have learned nothing since 1876.

* ”There are few superst.i.tions which have been so universal as a belief in witchcraft. The severe theology of paganism despised the wretched superst.i.tion, which has been greedily believed by millions of Christians.”--Buckle.

3. I wish I might copy here the sermon to women which the Rev.

Knox-Little, the well-known High-Church clergyman of England, preached when in this country in 1880, in which he said, ”There is no crime which a man can commit which justifies his wife in leaving him. It is her duty to subject herself to him always, and no crime that he can commit can justify her lack of obedience.” Although a little balder in statement than are most utterances of orthodox clergymen in this age, yet in sentiment and in the reason given for it the echo of ”Amen” comes from every pulpit where a believer in original sin, vicarious atonement, or the inspiration of the Bible has a representative and a voice. If self-respect or honor is ever to be the lot of woman, it will not be until her foot is on the neck of orthodoxy, and when the Bible ranks where it belongs in the field of literature.

Appendix F.