Part 6 (2/2)
What meaner men inhabit G.o.d's earth than some who have succeeded in working themselves into the church, and can boast of coming to the communion regularly? How many profess and fall away on every hand, yes, sink deeper in corruption than before! The fact is, this pretended argument to the disadvantage of the prisoner is all a sham.
The prison, if rightly conducted, possesses certain means of reform, which can not be had outside. To ill.u.s.trate: Here is a young man, who has never entered a school-house, or a place of wors.h.i.+p, but has spent his time with vicious companions and in vicious habits. He falls into prison, where his home is a cell and silence his constant companion.
Here he is removed from his former surroundings and opportunities for sinful indulgence. The loneliness and tedium of his condition soon become unendurable. He must, in some way, have relief. But no means lie within his reach except those connected with reform appliances. To these he is forced, by the pressure of his nature, to resort, simply for self-gratification, which he can find in hearing the human voice and in the connected exercises. He hears truth which he had never heard before, but which is permitted to fall on his mind with its full weight. He is thus led to reflect, repents of his sins, and becomes really a reformed man, a brand plucked from the burning.
The tendency of things, then, in a properly conducted prison, _is_ reformatory. Therefore, let ours be managed on that principle, and all in our State, worthy of such a place, be there a.s.signed for the requisite time, and, no doubt, one good, devoted, wide-awake man could do them more good than they now receive from all the religious means and labors outside put together.
”The sight of a woman is demoralizing to a prisoner.” The reader will readily understand in what respect. If this be true, what a demoralized cla.s.s must be our grown up, unmarried sons, our bachelors and widowers, with women constantly in sight. Then how wickedly does the warden himself proceed in taking certain of his men among the women to work; and in permitting women and girls dressed up in their finery to perambulate freely about the shops and buildings in sight of the men.
”But,” it is answered, ”the men are not allowed to look at visitors.”
True, but not being allowed is one thing, and not looking is quite another. If any man can make himself believe that, when a woman is conducted right into the presence of a prisoner, he will not obtain a sight of her, he possesses more credulity than falls to the common lot of men. The fact is, visitors about the shops are seen by the prisoners and thought of and talked about by them, no matter who pretends to the contrary. Every one knows this, who knows anything of a prison, let him say what he will. Then why select one spot, the chapel on the Sabbath, as a place where the sight of a woman is to be branded as a most polluting sin, and no objection raised to her being seen elsewhere almost daily and hourly? Consistency is a jewel.
If the sight of a woman is so demoralizing to a man confined in prison, how demoralized must he speedily become on leaving and meeting them everywhere! And what sinners prison managers in numerous other States have become through admitting women to moral labors in their inst.i.tutions! What egregious sinning on the part of that State which employs a woman as chaplain of its prison, and she permitted to go freely from cell to cell in her ministrations of mercy!
In the army, in hospitals, or whatever place men are found needy and dependent, true women are freely admitted as ministering angels, with no thought of demoralization. Yes, the world lauds the heroism and devotion of many of these in poetry and song.
So far as I could learn, the influence of the women in the chapel did not produce the effect alleged. I inquired of some on this point, at the time of their leaving, and solicited the real truth. Take the answer of an intelligent young man, one whom I have no doubt is sincere and reliable,--”The influence on my feelings were not in a wrong direction, but wholly to the contrary. I should have been ashamed of myself at indulging an impure thought towards that lady under whose care I was so long in the Sabbath school. I rather felt humbled and filled with grat.i.tude, that she should condescend to take me, a poor, wicked prisoner, not able to read or write, and labor so patiently and persistently to help me to what I now am, redeemed, I trust, and made a different man, largely through her labors. They were her words of hope and a.s.surance which first stimulated me with the idea of an earnest effort to rise from what I was.”
The fact is, some men have their pa.s.sions and will think, whether seeing any of the other s.e.x or not; and more or less are inclined to deeds of wrong. But, in the opinion of our best minds, the true course to pursue is, to admit judicious ladies, those of character and influence, to help in labors of reform.
”Motives of safety required the cell clearing.” This was the pretended reason, but could not have been the real one, according to the warden's own words. One day, in pa.s.sing along the cells with company, he remarked, ”Gentlemen, vigilance, vigilance, is the only safety here!
Lock me in one of those cells, and I would walk out in half an hour.
There is no safety in this prison but in the watchfulness of the guard.”
This being true, the small articles which the warden found in the cells could make no difference in regard to safety, therefore, their removal must have been from other motives.
8. _Chaplain's restrictions._ These were not given at once and in detail, but were learned by experience. One afternoon, the prisoners being in the shop, I took the key, as sometimes before, when needful, to enter the chapel by the south door, where there could have been no possible danger had the men been pa.s.sing to their cells; having gone a few steps, I heard the voice of the warden calling out, sternly,--”Chaplain, here, what are you doing with that key?” I informed him, and received the reply, ”Bring that key right back. You must not touch a key.” Quietly obeying, I returned the article and never touched it again, thinking, ”If he will speak out to me as an irritated father to a vexatious boy, what can be expected for the prisoners?” He had a perfect right to require me not to use the key, and I had a right to a gentlemanly treatment. I uttered not a word, though I could not help thinking. Afterwards when needing to enter the chapel, I must ask a guard, perhaps a mere boy, to go and unlock and lock the door for me, which seemed really ludicrous. Shortly after, I heard the warden speaking of his enormous burden in the line of watchfulness,--”I have to watch not only the prisoners to keep them right, but also the workmen, overseers, guards, steward, physician and chaplain.”
At another time I asked him to change the position of a cla.s.s in the Sabbath school to accommodate the singing, and received an answer not so insolent in tone as before, but, with the connected circ.u.mstances, equally clear for me to understand that I must propose no move, make no suggestion whatever about the school, leaving everything in that line to him. I could open and close the school and hear also those not otherwise provided for.
Again, finding a man in his cell with no lesson, he having broken his gla.s.ses, I pa.s.sed them to the deputy to be repaired. Days pa.s.sed, and no gla.s.ses were returned. Meeting the warden, I alluded to the matter. He replied, ”Chaplain, I would have you know that when a man needs anything, he must speak of it to the deputy or to me. You have no business with these things.” To my inquiry, ”Am I to understand that now, after speaking to you about the gla.s.ses, and putting them in the deputy's hands, the man must speak to one of you himself, before they can be returned?” he answered, ”Certainly.” Hence, on my next round, I said to the owner, ”Please speak to the warden or deputy about your gla.s.ses, and they will return them, probably, all right,” not giving him the least hint as to how matters really stood, though I could but think, ”Here is red-tapeism with a vengeance; not permitted to speak of anything in my own department.” Waiting for a time, and thinking that neither law nor gospel would object to my lending him my own, this I did, which he used until liberated. True, after some weeks, gla.s.ses were brought him, in which, however, he could not see.
Thus I was effectively taught my bounds, to touch nothing about the prison but my books, to suggest no change any way, and to bring nothing to the warden, or deputy, about a prisoner, which bounds I was ever careful to observe.
There was an attendant rule to this red tapeism, as I understood it, that bore hard on the prisoners,--that one must ask for a thing but once. Some would ask me to help them to an article, when I would say, ”You must go with that to the deputy, or warden.” They replied, ”I have, with the promise of it, but it does not come.” Or, perhaps, ”I ventured to ask the second time, and received the stern reply, 'Don't you ever mention that to me, again.'”
A forlorn condition this,--the State placing her wards helplessly under a man who is not to be reminded of a request, which had slipped his mind, perhaps, through the multiplicity of business. Surely, such a man should be very considerate and particularly careful about attending to the needs of his dependents.
The lessons taught me, the spirit manifested with all the surroundings, gave me to understand that I must walk in everything with the utmost circ.u.mspection or be mercilessly dealt with. True, I had ever labored to do all things in my prison management just as I should, ever acting with an eye single to the best prison order; but circ.u.mstances now evidently demanded of me a double care, that my every step should not only be right but appear right, and no shadow of grounds for complaint be any way found.
<script>