Part 13 (2/2)

125. The Heavy Penalty of Exile.--An Athenian will regard locking a criminal up for a term of years as a very foolish and expensive proceeding. If he has nothing wherewith to pay a round fine, why, simply send him into exile. This penalty is direful indeed to a Greek. The exile has often no protector, no standing in the courts of the foreign city, no government to avenge any outrage upon him.

He can be insulted, starved, stripped, nay, murdered, often with impunity. Worse still, he is cut off from his friends with whom all his life is tied up; he is severed from the guardian G.o.ds of his childhood,--”THE City,” the city of his birth, hopes, longings, exists no more for him. If he dies abroad, he is not sure of a decent funeral pyre; and meanwhile his children may be hungering at home. So long as the Athenians have this tremendous penalty of exile at their disposal, they do not feel the need of penitentiaries.

126. The Death Penalty at Athens.--There are also the stocks and whipping posts for meting out summary justice to irresponsible offenders. When the death penalty is imposed (and the matter often lies in the discretion of the dicasts), the criminal, if of servile or Barbarian blood, may be put to death in some hideous manner and his corpse tossed into the Barathron, a vile pit on the northwest side of Athens, there to be dishonored by the kites and crows. The execution of Athenian citizens, however, is extremely humane. The condemned is given a cup of poisonous hemlock juice and allowed to drink it while sitting comfortably among his friends in the prison. Little by little his body grows numb; presently he becomes senseless, and all is over without any pain.[*] The friends of the victim are then at liberty to give his body a suitable burial.

[*]No one can read the story of the death of Socrates in the prison, as told by Plato in the ”Phaedo,” without feeling (aside from the n.o.ble philosophical setting) how much more humane were such executions by hemlock than is the modern gallows or electric chair.

An Athenian trial usually lasts all day, and perhaps we have been able to witness only the end of it. It may well happen, however, that we cannot attend a dicastery at all. This day may be one which is devoted to a meeting of the public a.s.sembly, and duty summons the jurors, not in the court room, but to the Pnyx. This is no loss to us, however. We welcome the chance to behold the Athenian Ecclesia in action.

Chapter XVI. The Ecclesia of Athens.

127. The Rule of Democracy in Athens.--The Ecclesia, or Public a.s.sembly, of Athens is something more than the chief governmental organ in the state. It is the great leveling engine which makes Athens a true democracy, despite the great differences in wealth between her inhabitants, and the marked social pretensions of ”the n.o.ble and the good”--the educated cla.s.ses. At this time Athens is profoundly wedded to her democratic const.i.tution. Founded by Solon and Clisthenes, developed by Themistocles and Pericles, it was temporarily overthrown at the end of the Peloponnesian War; but the evil rule then of the ”Thirty Tyrants” has proved a better lesson on the evils of oligarchic rule than a thousand rhetoricians'

declamations upon the advantages of the ”rule of the many” as against the ”rule of the few.” Attica now acknowledges only one Lord--KING DEMOS--”King Everybody”--and until the coming of bondage to Macedon there will be no serious danger of an aristocratic reaction.

128. Aristocracy and Wealth. Their Status and Burdens.--True, there are old n.o.ble families in Athens,--like the Alcmaeonidae whereof Pericles sprang, and the Eumolpidae who supply the priests to Demeter, the Earth Mother. But these great houses have long since ceased to claim anything but SOCIAL preeminence. Even then one must take pains not to a.s.sume airs, or the next time one is litigant before the dicastery, the insinuation of ”an undemocratic, oligarchic manner of life” will win very many adverse votes among the jury. n.o.bility and wealth are only allowed to a.s.sert themselves in Athens when justified by an extraordinary amount of public service and public generosity.

Xenophon in his ”Memorabilia” makes Socrates tell Critobuls, a wealthy and self-important individual, that he is really so hampered by his high position as to be decidedly poor. ”You are obliged,”

says Socrates, ”to offer numerous and magnificent sacrifices; you have to receive and entertain sumptuously a great many strangers, and to feast [your fellow] citizens. You have to pay heavy contributions towards the public service, keeping horses and furnis.h.i.+ng choruses in peace times and in war bearing the expense of maintaining triremes and paying the special war taxes; and if you fail to do all this, they will punish you with as much severity as if you were caught stealing their money.”

129. Athenian Society Truly Democratic up to a Certain Point.--Wealth, then, means one perpetual round of public services and obligations, sweetened perhaps with a little empty praise, an inscription, an honorary crown, or best of all, an honorary statue ”to the public benefactor” as the chief reward. On the other hand one may be poor and be a thoroughly self-respecting, nay, prominent citizen.

Socrates had an absurdly small invested fortune and the G.o.ds knew that he did little enough in the way of profitable labor.[*] He had to support his wife and three children upon this income. He wore no chiton. His himation was always an old one, unchanged from summer to winter. He seems to have possessed only one pair of good sandals all his life. His rations were bread and water, save when he was invited out. Yet this man was welcome in the ”very best society.” Alcibiades, leader of the fast, rich set, and many more of the gilded youth of Athens dogged his heels. One meets not the slightest evidence that his poverty ever prevented him from carrying his philosophic message home to the wealthy and the n.o.ble.

There is no sn.o.bbishness, then, in this Athenian society. Provided a man is not pursuing a base mechanic art or an ign.o.ble trade, provided he has a real message to convey,--whether in literature, philosophy, or statecraft,--there are no questions ”who was your father?” or ”what is your income?”[+] Athens will hear him and accept his best. For this open-mindedness--almost unique in ancient communities--one must thank King Demos and his mouthpiece, the Ecclesia.

[*]Socrates's regular income from invested property seems to have been only about $12 per year. It is to be hoped his wife, Xanthippe, had a little property of her own!

[+]Possibly the son of a man whose parents notoriously had been slaves in Athens would have found many doors closed to him.

Athenians are intensely proud of their democracy. In aeschylus's ”Persians,” Atossa, the Barbarian queen, asks concerning the Athenians:--

”Who is the lord and shepherd of their flock?”

Very prompt is the answer:--

”They are not slaves, they bow to no man's rule.”

Again in Euripides's ”Supplicants” there is this boast touching Athens:--

<script>