Part 55 (1/2)
Our government is a government by political parties. That is, political parties control the government. Voters acting independently of one another cannot exercise much influence. There must be teamwork in political matters as in everything else. A political party consists of those voters who think alike and act together on questions of government policy, or in electing their representatives in government. It is a voluntary organization, entirely outside of the government and not recognized in our const.i.tutions, but exercising very great influence upon government.
In his Farewell Address to the people, Was.h.i.+ngton said:
The spirit [of party] unfortunately is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest pa.s.sions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but in those of the popular form it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissensions...is a frightful despotism... The common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
MISCHIEFS OF THE PARTY SPIRIT
As long as people differ on questions of public policy there are bound to be political parties, as Was.h.i.+ngton knew, and they have always played an important part in our government. But necessary and useful as parties have been, the events of our history have shown that Was.h.i.+ngton's warning was exceedingly wise, the ”party spirit” having often proved the ”worst enemy” of our democratic government.
VALUE OF MINORITY OPPOSITION
When some great question is before the country, like that of the adoption of the Const.i.tution, or that of slavery, the people are usually divided into two great parties. The party that marshals the greater number of votes const.i.tutes a majority and gains control of the government. The defeated minority usually accepts its defeat in a sportsmanlike manner and loyally supports the government. Nevertheless it does not cease its opposition to the principles of the party in power. One of the chief values of the party system is that it keeps important questions in constant discussion. The opposition of the minority serves as a check upon the acts of the party in power, which is anxious to avoid arousing too much opposition. This is one means of control over the government enjoyed by the minority party. A defeated minority at one election may become a victorious majority at the next. The fact that a party is in the minority does not necessarily mean that it is in the wrong.
HOW MINORITIES MAY GAIN CONTROL
Minorities, however, sometimes win elections. If more than two parties are contesting the election, which often happens, that one wins which has the greatest number of votes, though this number may be less than the combined votes of the opposing parties. No other arrangement seems possible. President Wilson won his first election by a minority vote, the opposition being divided between Taft and Roosevelt.
A minority may win through better teamwork. There are always some voters who, through indifference or other causes, do not cast their vote. This is especially likely to happen in local elections, in which there is almost never as large a vote cast as in the same district at a general election. It is one of the chief objects of a party organization to keep its members informed and interested and to see that they cast their votes. The party that is best organized for these purposes is very likely to win over its opponents even though the latter are more numerous.
ORGANIZATION OF PARTIES AND ITS CONTROL
The organization of the national political parties is very thorough. Each party has a managing committee in every local district, the local organizations are united in a state organization, and the several state organizations in a national organization. The shrewdest men the party affords are made chairmen of committees and chosen for other positions of leaders.h.i.+p. Such organization is necessary and proper; it is only commonsense teamwork. But unfortunately it has frequently fallen into the hands of designing men who have used it to promote private interests rather than those of the public. A political ”boss,” who is at the head of an inner ”ring” of politicians, often decides who shall be nominated for the various offices of government, leaving no choice to the voters themselves. This makes of our government a real autocracy, and the worst kind of autocracy, because the autocrat (the ”boss”) acts in secret, and is in no way responsible to the people. It is the ”frightful despotism” of which Was.h.i.+ngton warned his countrymen (p. 385).
CAUSES OF SOCIAL UNREST
Political ”bosses” are often allied with powerful business interests which seek legislation and governmental administration favorable to themselves. This has given rise to the charge sometimes made that our government is a ”plutocracy,” a government of the people by a small wealthy cla.s.s. It is the feeling that this is so that has caused much of the social unrest at the present time, and that explains in part the growth of the socialists, and of other groups that would go much further than the socialists in their proposed changes, such as the I.W.W.
(Independent Workers of the World) in our country, the Bolshevists in Russia, and anarchists everywhere.
GOVERNMENT IN THE INTEREST OF ALL CLa.s.sES
Unquestionably selfish groups representing great wealth have often exerted undue influence in governmental affairs without regard for the public welfare. We have seen how the public lands and the nation's natural resources have in some cases fallen into the hands of wealthy individuals and corporations to the injury of the nation and of those who want to use them for productive purposes.
On the other hand, it is natural that men who have been successful in managing their private business affairs should also be influential in managing public affairs without necessarily having unworthy motives. Nevertheless, when government falls under the control of ANY particular cla.s.s or group, whether it represents wealth, or labor, or any other interest, if it has not due regard for all cla.s.ses, and if it denies to the members of other groups the voice in government to which they are ent.i.tled, it establishes a despotism and overthrows democracy.
WHY THE PEOPLE SUBMIT TO ”BOSS RULE”
Why do the people submit to ”boss rule”? In the first place, they do not always submit to it. Occasionally, when the ”bosses” go to unusual extremes, the people give way to ”fits of public rage,” to use the words of former Senator Elihu Root, ”in which the people rouse up and tear down the political leader, first of one party and then of the other party.” It is thus possible for the people to escape the despotism of ”boss rule.” But two things seem to be necessary to bring it about: first, the people must be sufficiently INTERESTED in the management of their public affairs; and, second, they require LEADERs.h.i.+P. It takes close attention to public affairs to enable a citizen to make wise decisions for himself; and the average citizen looks around for guidance. The absence of RESPONSIBLE leaders.h.i.+p gives the irresponsible ”boss”
his chance.
THE SHORT BALLOT
One difficulty encountered by the citizen who wishes to vote intelligently is the large number of persons to be chosen. There have been cases where the names of several hundred candidates appeared on the same ticket. In a small community a voter may know personally all the candidates, but in larger communities this is not so. It was once thought that to make as many of the government offices as possible elective was a step in the direction of democracy, and that it gave the people direct control over them.
But it has not worked out this way. It is impossible for the average voter to choose wisely among so many candidates, and he therefore falls an easy prey to ”boss rule.” The SHORT BALLOT is now quite generally advocated to meet this situation. By this plan the number of officers to be elected is reduced, and includes only those who are responsible for determining the policies of government, such as members of legislatures and the chief executive officers. These few important officers and representatives are then made responsible for the appointment of all other subordinate officers whose business is to carry policies into effect. This really gives the people better control over their government by fixing responsibility in a few places, and is therefore no less democratic than the older plan.
Do you have a long ballot or a short ballot in your county or town? In your state?
How many offices in your county government are elective? How many of the men holding these offices do you know? Consult your parents as to the number of these officers they know personally. How many does your teacher know?
At the next election, get a copy of the ballot used in your community and ascertain the number of candidates for all offices, including local, state, and national.
What national political parties exist at present?