Part 52 (1/2)
The recent war imposed an unusually heavy burden of taxation upon us. But when we think of the millions of people who paid for the war with their LIVES, and of the fact that the war was fought for the most precious of all things,--human liberty,--the money tax that each citizen had to pay in some form or other seems very insignificant.
BENEFITS OF TEAM WORK IN TAXATION
In Chapter IV we read how Benjamin Franklin secured the services of a man to keep the pavements of the neighborhood clean ”for the sum of sixpence per month to be paid by each house.” By this bit of cooperation, each householder was relieved of a burden, and had the benefit not only of having his own pavement cleaned, but also of knowing that those of all his neighbors would be equally clean, and thus of having a pleasanter neighborhood, and the cost was insignificant. This incident ill.u.s.trates the underlying principle of taxation in a self-governing community. The poorest citizen is made rich in the benefits that he may enjoy, while the cost is made proportional to his ability to pay.
MISUSE OF TAXES
Like the rest of our governing machinery, however, our system of levying, collecting, and paying taxes does not always work perfectly, and there is more or less ground for dissatisfaction with it. In the first place, the people do not always get full value for their taxes. While it is true that the farmer receives, in return for his road tax, vastly more than he could purchase privately with the same amount of money, yet, if the road improvements are poorly made, he gets less than he should. It usually costs as much to employ an inefficient road supervisor, or school teacher or superintendent, or sheriff, as to employ an efficient one--in fact, in the long run it costs more. Sometimes more persons are employed in government offices than there is any need for, or some of those employed are s.h.i.+rkers, or otherwise inefficient. There is wastefulness in the methods by which appropriations are made for the expenses of government. Sometimes there is ”graft,” by which public money is diverted to the private uses of officials, contractors, or others.
A CAUSE OF DISSATISFACTION
Such abuses as these are, of course, not faults of the TAXING system, but they naturally make citizens reluctant to pay taxes.
People want to know that their money is spent for the purposes for which it was paid, and that it is used economically and effectively for these purposes. Nothing else will do so much to remove the dislike of taxation as a.s.surance on these points. As Franklin said with reference to his successful experiment in street cleaning, it ”raised a general desire to have all the streets paved, and made the people more willing to submit to a tax for that purpose.”
TAXATION MUST BE JUST
A system of taxation must be JUST if it is to meet with popular approval. It is not easy, nor indeed possible, to devise a system that works with absolute justice in every case; for the a.s.sessment of taxes is a complicated process, and reliance must be placed to a considerable extent upon the honesty and conscientiousness of individual citizens. The people are satisfied, however, if they see that every reasonable effort is made to secure justice.
The first essential in a just system is that EVERY CITIZEN SHALL BEAR HIS SHARE of the burden. Therefore the paying of taxes is compulsory by law. It is also just that each citizen shall pay only IN PROPORTION TO HIS ABILITY. These two principles of taxation are similar to those applied in the selective draft for war service. It is in a.s.sessing taxes according to ability to pay that one of the princ.i.p.al difficulties appears. But an effort has been made to do this by the following procedure.
HOW THE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED IS DETERMINED
It is first necessary to know how much money will be needed by the government. Each year, therefore, the heads of the various branches and departments of government make an estimate for the coming year, based on their knowledge of past expenditures and present and future needs. Such estimate can be made intelligently only when there is an accurate and businesslike system of keeping accounts and records, and a well-planned BUDGET SYSTEM.
Unbusinesslike methods of keeping accounts and the lack of a budget system have been among the chief weaknesses of our governments, equally characteristic of local, state, and national governments. Efforts are being made to remedy these defects and are described in Chapters XXV, XXVI, and XXVII.
TAXES ON PERSONS, PROPERTY, AND PRIVILEGES
The second thing to be ascertained is the ability of each citizen to pay. In some states a uniform POLL TAX is a.s.sessed upon every adult citizen. This is a tax upon the PERSON and usually amounts to about two dollars. Only those are exempt who are incapable of self-support. But the chief reliance is upon a property tax. State and local governments depend princ.i.p.ally upon a GENERAL PROPERTY TAX, for which purpose property is divided into two kinds: REAL ESTATE, which includes land and buildings, and PERSONAL PROPERTY, which includes furniture, tools, livestock, money, and valuables of various kinds. In addition to the general property tax there may be taxes upon INCOMES and upon INHERITANCES. There are also LICENSE TAXES, such as dog and automobile licenses. Finally there are taxes upon certain PRIVILEGES which are bestowed upon the individual by the community and have a money value. Of such a nature is the license tax imposed upon a peddler or upon a person who maintains a market stand on the public street. Such, also, are the taxes placed upon corporations for the privilege of using the public highways for car tracks, water mains, or telephone poles.
It is necessary, therefore, for the government to a.s.sESS THE VALUE of the property (or privilege) of each citizen, and it has its organization for this purpose. Each local community The a.s.sessment of (towns.h.i.+p, county, or city) has one or more TAX ASESSORS, who endeavor to ascertain by inquiry values or inspection the value of each citizen's property. The sum of the individual a.s.sessments const.i.tutes the a.s.sessment valuation for the town, or county, or city; and the sum of the valuations of these local communities const.i.tutes the valuation for the entire state.
THE RATE OF TAXATION
The third step is to ascertain the RATE of taxation. This is found by dividing the total amount to be raised by taxation The rate of by the total property valuation of the county or taxation state, as the case may be. If the amount to be raised is $500,000, and the property valuation is $10,000,000, the rate would be 5 per cent, and the tax is levied against each citizen at this rate. A citizen who owns twice as much property as another should pay twice as much tax. Each should pay according to his ability.
DIFFICULTY OF JUST a.s.sESSMENT
This seems like a simple procedure; but it is very difficult to get a just result. The difficulty lies chiefly in the a.s.sessment It requires a good deal of intelligence to a.s.sess property fairly, even with the best of intentions. a.s.sessors are not always competent. Two a.s.sessors may differ in their judgment, so that a.s.sessments in one part of the community may run at a lower level than in another part. Thus a.s.sessments vary in their fairness in different towns.h.i.+ps of the same county, and in different counties of the same state. An attempt is made to avoid this by means of county and state TAX EQUALIZATION BOARDS, which seek to adjust differences of this sort. But their efforts are only partially successful.
RESPONSIBILITY OF PROPERTY OWNERS
Property owners are themselves, however, more responsible than anyone else for the inequities of taxation in our country. It is a common practice of tax a.s.sessors to accept the property owner's own statement of the valuation of his property. In an astonis.h.i.+ngly large proportion of cases he gives a valuation far below the real one. Even when the a.s.sessor inspects the property, it is easy to conceal from his eyes certain forms of personal property, such as money, stocks and bonds, and jewelry. Land and livestock cannot be concealed; and for this reason farmers are likely to pay a heavier share of taxes than others whose property is in less conspicuous forms. But they may make false valuations.
ILl.u.s.tRATIONS OF UNJUST a.s.sESSMENTS
In one state, where the law requires the a.s.sessment of real estate ”at its true value in money when sold in the ordinary manner of sale,” a study in one towns.h.i.+p showed that ”the average TAX value of farm land in the open country ... is $7.89, while the average MARKET value runs around $20. The 73 largest taxpayers give in their farm holdings at values ranging from $6 to $20 an acre. Thus the burden of state and county support falls three or four times as heavily on one acre of farm land as on another--on farms lying side by side.
”When we look at suburban farm land the tax values range from $17 to $2220 an acre.
”But the most amazing 'jokes' appear in the values put by their owners on improved town lots. In the same end of the town we found three handsome town properties worth around $15,000 each, the tax values were $550, $4400, $4950. In another neighborhood, two adjoining homes about equal in value were listed at $500 and $3400; one at about 50 per cent and the other at about 8 per cent of the actual value.”