Part 2 (2/2)
”The misfortune of woman is not that she is unable to do the work of a man, but that she is wasting her life force to outdo him, with a tradition of centuries which has left her physically incapable of keeping pace with him. Oh, I know some have succeeded, but at what cost, at what terrific cost! The import is not the kind of work woman does, but rather the quality of the work she furnishes. She can give suffrage or the ballot no new quality, nor can she receive anything from it that will enhance her own quality. Her development, her freedom, her independence, must come from and through herself. First, by a.s.serting herself as a personality, and not as a s.e.x commodity. Second, by refusing the right to anyone over her body; by refusing to bear children unless she wants them; by refusing to be a servant to G.o.d, the State, society, the husband, the family, etc.; by making her life simpler, but deeper and richer. That is, by trying to learn the meaning and substance of life in all its complexities, by freeing herself from the fear of public opinion and public condemnation. Only that, and not the ballot, will set woman free, will make her a force hitherto unknown in the world; a force for real love, for peace, for harmony; a force of divine fire, of life giving; a creator of free men and women.”
There is little in this that Ibsen would not have said amen to. But--and this is the conclusion to which my chapter draws--Ibsen has said it already, and said it more powerfully. Emma Goldman--who (if among women anyone) should have for us a message of her own, striking to the heart--repeats, in a less effective cadence, what she has learned from him.
The work of Beatrice Webb is the prose of revolution. The work of Ibsen is its poetry. Beatrice Webb has performed her work--one comes to feel--as well as Ibsen has his. And one wonders if, after all, the prose is not that which women are best endowed to succeed in.
A book review (written by a woman) which I have at hand contains some generalizations which bear on the subject. ”This is a woman's book [says the reviewer], and a book which could only have been written by a woman, though it is singularly devoid of most of the qualities which are usually recognized as feminine. For romance and sentiment do not properly lie in the woman's domain. She deals, when she is herself, with the material facts of the life she knows. Her talent is to exhibit them in the remorseless light of reality and shorn of all the glamour of idealism. Great and poetical imagination rarely informs her art, but within the strictness of its limits it lives by an intense and scrupulous sincerity of observation and an uncompromising recognition of the logic of existence.”
If that is true, shall we not then expect a future more largely influenced by women to have more of the hard, matter-of-fact quality, the splendid realism characteristic of woman ”when she is herself”?
CHAPTER VI
MARGARET DREIER ROBINS
The work of Margaret Dreier Robins has been done in the National Women's Trade Union League. It might be supposed that the aim of such an organization is sufficiently explicit in its t.i.tle: to get higher wages and shorter hours. But I fancy that it would be a truer thing to say that its aim is to bring into being that ideal of American womanhood which Walt Whitman described:
They are not one jot less than I am, They are tann'd in the face by s.h.i.+ning suns and blowing winds, Their flesh has the old divine suppleness and strength, They know how to swim, row, ride, wrestle, shoot, run, strike, retreat, advance, resist, defend themselves, They are ultimate in their own right--they are calm, clear, well-possessed of themselves.
When Whitman made this magnificent prophecy for American womanhood the Civil War had not been fought and its economic consequences were unguessed at. The factory system, which had come into England in the last century, bringing with it the most unspeakable exploitation of women and children, had hardly gained a foothold in this country. In 1840, of the seven employments open to women (teaching, needlework, keeping boarders, working in cotton mills, in bookbinderies, typesetting and household service) only one was representative of the new industrial condition which today affects so profoundly the feminine physique. And to the daughters of a nation that was still imbued with the pioneer spirit, work in cotton mills appealed so little that they undertook it only for unusually high pay. Anyone of that period seeing the red-cheeked, robust, intelligent, happy girl operatives of Lowell might have dismissed his fears of the factory as a sinister influence in the development of American womanhood and gone on to dream, with Walt Whitman, of a race of ”fierce, athletic girls.”
But two things happened. With the growing flood of immigration, the factories were abandoned more and more to the ”foreigners,” the native-born citizens losing their pride in the excellence of working conditions and the character of the operatives. And all the while the factory was becoming more and more an integral part of our civilization, demanding larger and larger mult.i.tudes of girls and women to attend its machinery. So that, with the enormous development of industry since the Civil War, the factory has become the chief field of feminine endeavor in America. In spite of the great opening up of all sorts of work to women, in spite of the store, the office, the studio, the professions, still the factory remains most important in any consideration of the health and strength of women.
If the greatest part of our womankind spends its life in factories, and if it further appears that this is no temporary situation, but (practically speaking) a permanent one, then it becomes necessary to inquire how far the factory is hindering the creation of that ideal womanhood which Walt Whitman predicted for us.
As opposed to the old-fas.h.i.+oned method of manufacture in the home (or the sweatshop, which is the modern equivalent), the factory often shows a gain in light and air, a decrease of effort, an added leisure; while, on the other hand, there is a considerable loss of individual freedom and an increase in monotony. But child labor, a too long working day, bad working conditions, lack of protection from fire, personal exploitation by foremen, inhumanly low wages, and all sorts of petty injustice, though not essential to the system, are prominent features of factory work as it generally exists.
People who consider every factory an Inferno, however, and have only pity for its workers, are far from understanding the situation. Here is a field of work which is capable of competing successfully with domestic service, and even of attracting girls from homes where there exists no absolute necessity for women's wages. Yet at its contemporary best, with a ten-hour law in operation, efficient factory inspection, decent working conditions and a just and humane management, the factory remains an inst.i.tution extremely perilous to the Whitmanic ideal of womanhood.
But there are women who, undaunted by the new conditions brought about by a changing economic system, seize upon those very conditions to use them as the means to their end: such a woman is Mrs. Robins. Has a new world, bounded by factory walls and noisy with the roar of machinery, grown up about us, to keep women from their heritage? She will help them to use those very walls and that very machinery to achieve their destiny, a destiny of which a physical well-being is, as Walt Whitman knew it to be, the most certain symbol.
The factory already gives women a certain independence. It may yet give them pleasure, the joy of creation. Indeed, it must, when the workers require it; and those who are most likely to require it are the women workers.
It is well known that with the ultra-development of the machine, the subdivision of labor, the regime of piecework, it has become practically impossible for the worker to take any artistic pleasure in his product.
It is not so well known how necessary such pleasure in the product is to the physical well-being of women--how utterly disastrous to their nervous organization is the monotony and irresponsibility of piecework.
This method--which men workers have grumbled at, but to which they seem to have adjusted themselves--bears its fruits among women in neurasthenia, headaches, and the derangement of the organs which are the basis of their different nervous const.i.tution. It is sufficiently clear to those who have seen the personal reactions of working girls to the piecework system, that when women attain, as men in various industries have attained, the practical management of the factory, piecework will get a setback.
But not merely good conditions, not merely a living wage, not merely a ten or an eight hour day--all that self-government in the shop can bring is the object of the Women's Trade Union League.
”The chief social gain of the union shop,” says Mrs. Robins, ”is not its generally better wages and shorter hours, but rather the incentive it offers for initiative and social leaders.h.i.+p, the call it makes, through the common industrial relations.h.i.+p and the common hope, upon the moral and reasoning faculties, and the sense of fellows.h.i.+p, independence and group strength it develops. In every workshop of say thirty girls there is undreamed of initiative and capacity for social leaders.h.i.+p and control--unknown wealth of intellectual and moral resources.”
It is, in fact, this form of activity which to many thousands of factory girls makes the difference between living and existing, between a painful, necessary drudgery and a happy exertion of all their faculties.
It can give them a more useful education than any school, a more vital faith than any church, a more invigorating sense of power than any other career open to them.
To do all these things it must be indigenous to working-cla.s.s soil. No benefaction originating in the philanthropic motives of middle-cla.s.s people, no enterprise of patronage, will ever have any such meaning. A movement, to have such meaning, must be of the working cla.s.s, and by the working cla.s.s, as well as for the working cla.s.s. It must be imbued with working-cla.s.s feeling, and it must subserve working-cla.s.s ideals.
It is the distinction of Mrs. Robins that she has seen this. She has gone to the workers to learn rather than to teach--she has sought to unfold the ideals and capacities latent in working girls rather than impress upon them the alien ideals and capacities of another cla.s.s.
<script>