Part 7 (1/2)
How unfavourably the introduction of tea was regarded, by some writers at any rate, may be gathered from the following paragraph, which appeared in the _Pacquet_ of October 23rd, 1792:--”A correspondent says that in the neighbourhood of Greystoke, during the late harvest, added to an increase of wages, the female reapers had regularly their tea every afternoon, and the men, toast and ale. How different is this from the beef-steak breakfasts of old! How degenerate is the present age, and how debilitated may the next be!”
Oat-cake and brown bread are less favoured in the two counties than was formerly the case, a fact which was often deplored by the late Bishop of Carlisle, Dr. Goodwin. It is not a little curious that two articles which formed the staple portions of the diet of the people from sixty to a hundred years ago, should now be regarded more in the nature of luxuries.
As an example of the sparing way in which ”white flour” was used, an old Appleby native tells a story concerning what happened at a good hostelry in the borough, sixty years ago, at a time when wheaten flour was very scarce, but butcher meat very plentiful. Among other good substantial things on the table was a huge meat pie, at the s.h.i.+lling ordinary. Just, however, as the ”head of the table” was about to cut the crust, the waiter whispered to him, ”Please, sir, missis says flour is so dear, ye must run t' knife round t' crust and lift it clean off on to my tray to do another time.”
From the remains of ancient structures it is still possible to draw good pictures of the way the old inhabitants pa.s.sed their lives therein. The late Dr. M. W. Taylor by that means elaborated the story of the daily doings of the people, from lord to va.s.sal, who inhabited Yanwath Hall. A similar picture has been presented by Mr. J. F. Curwen in his monograph on Levens Hall ”in the bygone”:--
”Just within would be the raised dais, with its flanking window bay, and the long table, at the higher side of which the lord with his family and any distinguished guests took their meals, whilst on the floor below those of an inferior rank were seated at tables ranging along each side of the room. At the opposite, or western, end, the oaken screens, nine and a half feet high, extended across the full width, dividing off the heck or pa.s.sage, from which opened out the kitchen, b.u.t.tery, and other offices, and from over which the musicians in the minstrels' gallery would on all occasions of more than ordinary importance enliven the feast with their melody. This hall was also used for the transaction of business between the lord and his va.s.sals, for here he would hold his royalty court, receiving their suit and service, and administer justice according to the powers granted to him by the Crown. At night time the retainers would huddle together on the thickly strewn rushes in the middle of the floor, around the fire and its convolving wreaths of smoke ascending to the open lantern in the roof. For it must be remembered that chimneys were not introduced into England, except to a few castles, until the fifteenth century, about the time when the Redemans would be transferring Levens to Alan Bellingham.”
With chimneys came new taxes, and some of them were not only keenly resented, but evaded as openly as was possible. The people seem to have had a special dislike to the tax of two s.h.i.+llings a year which was pa.s.sed in the twelfth year of Charles the Second, for that was a heavy sum, having regard to the value of money then. Among the ma.n.u.scripts preserved at Rydal Hall, Westmorland, by the le Flemings, are a great many references to this tax. There were schemes for subst.i.tuting other imposts, as appears by a sentence contained in a letter (May 10th, 1669) by Daniel Fleming, Rydal, to Joseph Williamson, who had just purchased the estate of Winderwath, near Temple Sowerby:--”There are rumours one while that the Scots are up in armes, another while that bishops and dean and chapter lands will be sold, or annext to the crowne in the place of the excise and hearth money, and bishops to be maintained by sallaries out of the exchequer.”
Another doc.u.ment is from the Lords Commissioners to the justices of the peace in the Barony of Kendal, concerning the collection of the hearth tax, and an item in a news-letter of April, 1671, says, ”This day the Lord Treasurer received proposals for the farm of the hearth money; those who propose to keep it as it was, advancing only 100,000, are to make a new offer.” During the following summer another came ”from the Court at Whitehall” to the justices of the peace for Westmorland, ”Cautioning them against allowing exemptions from hearth money too readily. They should consider firstly who are they whom the law intends to be exempted. Then they should appoint petty sessions for the signing of certificates at such times and places that the royal officers may attend and be heard. It cannot be supposed that the law intends to oblige the justices to allow whatsoever shall be offered them without examining the truth thereof.” A news-letter of April 23rd, 1674, gives an idea of the extent of the tax in the following sentence:--”This day the farm of the hearth money was made and let to Mr. Anslem, Mr. Perry, and Mr. Buckley, at 151,000 per annum, and 25,000 advance, commencing at Michaelmas next.”
Some of the entries are of special interest to c.u.mberland and Westmorland.
Thus in a letter to Daniel Fleming on January 8th, 1674-5, Robert Joplin, writing from Kendal, ”apologises for writing as he had not been able to wait upon him. Has been seven weeks in the country, and surveyed and taken account of all the hearths in most of the market towns of this county, and in c.u.mberland. Had always behaved with all civility. If he will have the duplicates of the surveys made they will be handed in at the next sessions.” A week later Robert Joplin and Richard Bell, the collectors of the hearth tax, report to the justices of Kendal: ”Have surveyed most of the market towns in the two counties, levying the tax of 2s. on every fire hearth. Would not proceed to distrain without the justices' permission.
Some refuse to pay because they were not charged before. All kitchens and beerhouses refuse on the same pretence. Many hearths have been made up, most of them lately. We trust that the justices will be very careful in giving certificates.”
A few days afterwards Nathaniel Johnson, another collector of the tax, writes from Newcastle to Daniel Fleming that he ”does not think the determination of the justices to proceed in the matter of the hearth money under the old survey, until the new is perfected, is consistent with the law; nevertheless he will yield to their opinion.” Johnson proves to be a difficult official with whom to deal, and he writes to Fleming in July, ”Remonstrating against the conduct of the Kendal magistrates in the matter of the hearth money. It has been already decided that smiths' hearths are liable. The practice of walling up hearths in a temporary manner is plainly fraudulent. The magistrates ought not to countenance such things, nor refuse the evidence of officials engaged in this business, for of course none other can be made. May reluctantly be compelled to appeal against their proceedings.”
These and similar protests did not appear to have much effect, though frequently repeated, and ten years later came an order from the Lord High Treasurer to the Clerk of the Peace of the county of Lancaster, to be communicated to the justices, in view of the difficulties raised by them in the collection of the hearth money: ”The duty is to be levied on empty houses, smiths' forges, innkeepers' and bakers' ovens, on landlords for tenements let to persons exempt on account of poverty, on private persons where there is a hearth and oven in one chimney. The duty may be levied on the goods of landlords and tenants which are not on the premises whereon the duty arises.”
There is a rather amusing reference to the subject in a letter sent by William Fleming to his brother Roger Fleming, at Coniston Hall: ”Tell the constable the same hearth man is coming again. Tell him to be as kind as his conscience will permit to his neighbours, and play the fool no more.
The priest and he doth not know how happy they are.”
The means available, in bygone days, for quenching fire were, everywhere in the two counties, of a most primitive character. In March, 1657, the Corporation of Kendal decreed, as there had ”happened of late within this borough great loss and damage by fire,” and the Corporation had not fit instruments and materials for speedy subduing of the flames, that the Mayor and Alderman should each provide two leathern buckets, and each burgess one such bucket, before May 1st following, the penalty being a fine of 6s. 8d. in the case of the leading men, and half that amount for default on the part of others.
Sports and Festivities.
It is almost impossible to separate the sports of the c.u.mberland and Westmorland people from the festivals, inasmuch as some of the pastimes were prominent items in gatherings even of a semi-religious character.
Wrestling, that finest of North-Country exercises, has been practically killed by the compet.i.tion of other athletic games, but more than all by the ”barneying” so often practised by the wrestlers. To this cause must be ascribed the fall of the ”mother ring” at Carlisle, and the disfavour into which the sport has dropped in all parts of the two counties, albeit the Grasmere exhibitions are still kept up to a fair standard of honesty. For centuries it was the greatest amus.e.m.e.nt of fellsider, dalesman, and town dweller, and it was no uncommon thing for men to walk, in the pre-railway days, twenty miles to a wrestling meeting. Pure love of sport must have been the motive, because the prize usually consisted only of a belt of the value of from ten s.h.i.+llings to a sovereign--often much less--and a small sum of money which would now be looked at with contempt even when offered by way of ”expenses.” The men whose prowess gained them more than local fame were often almost perfect specimens of what athletes should be at their respective weights, and their skill cannot be approached by any of the medium and light weights now in the ring. For several other reasons the sport is ent.i.tled--unfortunately so--to be cla.s.sed among things belonging to the bygone, and to the next generation wrestling, as understood at the Melmerby and Langwathby Rounds fifty years ago, will be unknown.
Clergymen have often been included among the best wrestlers of their time, especially in West c.u.mberland, though some who as young men were noted for their prowess in this direction gave up this sport when they took holy orders. William Litt, whose name will always have a place in local sporting annals through his book, ”Wrestliana,” was intended for the Church. His tastes were so obviously in other directions that the plan had to be abandoned, and he developed into one of the finest wrestlers of his time. The Rev. G. Wilkinson, Vicar of Arlecdon, and the Rev. O. Littleton, Vicar of b.u.t.termere, were also ardent followers of the sport; while the Rev. A. Brown, Egremont, and the inventor of the ”chip” known as b.u.t.tocking, was described as one of the best exponents of the old game to be found in the north of England.
A sporting custom peculiar to the two counties--for the n.o.bleman most concerned has immense possessions in each--is the race for the Burgh Barony Cup. The meeting has been well described as ”a singular old-world inst.i.tution, one of a number of antiquated customs mixed up with the land laws.” The races are held to celebrate the ”reign” of a new Lord Lonsdale, consequently no earl ever sees more than one--at least when he is the head of the family. The last meeting on Burgh Marsh was in March, 1883, when the arrangements were on a royal scale, thousands of persons being present, an enormous number of them as the guests of his lords.h.i.+p.
Wrestling formed an important part of the proceedings during the two days, but the central item was the race for the cup. The compet.i.tors were confined to animals owned by free or customary tenants within the Barony, and the winner of the hundred guineas trophy was greeted with frantic cheering.
Carlisle possesses a unique racing relic. The ”horse courses” were formerly held on Kingmoor, and the ”Carlisle bells” were doubtless prized as much in their day as the stakes for 10,000 are now. The articles frequently figure in the Munic.i.p.al Records as the Horse and Nage Bells, and were for a long time lost, being ultimately found in an old box in the Town Clerk's office. Mr. Llewellyn Jewitt, F.S.A., some twenty years ago gave this description of the relics: ”The racing bells are globular in form, with slits at the bottom, as is usual in bells of that cla.s.s. The loose ball which would originally lie in the inside, so as to produce the sound, has disappeared. The largest, which is two and a quarter inches in diameter, is of silver gilt, and bears on a band round its centre the inscription [each word being separated by a cross]:
+ THE + SWEFTES + HORSE + THES + BEL + TO + TAK + FOR + MI + LADE + DAKER + SAKE
This lady was probably Elizabeth, daughter of George Talbot, fourth Earl of Shrewsbury, and wife of William, Lord Dacre of Gilsland, who was Governor of Carlisle in the reign of Queen Elizabeth. The other bell, also of silver, is smaller in size, and bears the initials H.B.M.C. (Henry Baines, Mayor of Carlisle), 1559. On Shrove Tuesday Kingmoor became a busy scene, and the contests created much excitement among the freemen and others. The bell was not an uncommon prize, either in horse-racing or c.o.c.k-fighting, and was held by the victor, as challenge cups and s.h.i.+elds are at the present day, from one year to another, or from one race to another. To win this race was of course a mark of honour, and gave rise to the popular expression of 'to bear away the bell.' At York the racing prize in 1607 was a small golden bell, and the Corporation Records of Chester about 1600 show that in that city a silver bell was given to be raced for on the Roodee; but I am not aware that any of them are now in existence. Probably the Carlisle examples are unique.”
[Ill.u.s.tration: CARLISLE RACING BELLS.]
There are many other evidences that racing has for several centuries been a favourite pastime with the people of c.u.mberland and Westmorland. The race meetings seem to have been made occasions for county gatherings of other kinds, and especially for c.o.c.k-fights--a sport which has not yet entirely died out. The following advertis.e.m.e.nt of Penrith races in 1769, which appeared in the _St. James's Chronicle_ for that year, may be quoted as an example of many others, relating not only to Penrith but to other towns in the two counties:--
_Penrith Races, 1769._