Part 101 (1/2)
UNIVERSITY ORGANIZATION
The word ”university” [21] meant at first simply a union or a.s.sociation.
In the Middle Ages all artisans were organized in guilds, [22] and when masters and pupils a.s.sociated themselves for teaching and study they naturally copied the guild form. This was the more necessary since the student body included so many foreigners, who found protection against annoyances only as members of a guild.
DEGREES
Like a craft guild a university consisted of masters (the professors), who had the right to teach, and students, both elementary and advanced, who corresponded to apprentices and journeymen. After several years of study a student who had pa.s.sed part of his examination became a ”bachelor of arts”
and might teach certain elementary subjects to those beneath him. Upon the completion of the full course--usually six years in length--the bachelor took his final examinations and, if he pa.s.sed them, received the coveted degree of ”master of arts.” But as is the case to-day, many who attended the universities never took a degree at all.
THE TEACHERS
A university of the Middle Ages did not need an expensive collection of libraries, laboratories, and museums. Its only necessary equipment consisted in lecture rooms for the professors. Not even benches or chairs were required. Students often sat on the straw-strewn floors. The high price of ma.n.u.scripts compelled professors to give all instruction by lectures. This method of teaching has been retained in modern universities, since even the printed book is a poor subst.i.tute for a scholar's inspiring words.
THE STUDENTS
The universities being under the protection of the Church, it was natural that those who attended them should possess some of the privileges of clergymen. Students were not required to pay taxes or to serve in the army. They also enjoyed the right of trial in their own courts. This was an especially valuable privilege, for medieval students were constantly getting into trouble with the city authorities. The sober annals of many a university are relieved by tales of truly Homeric conflicts between Town and Gown. When the students were dissatisfied with their treatment in one place, it was always easy for them to go to another university. Sometimes masters and scholars made off in a body. Oxford appears to have owed its existence to a large migration of English students from Paris, Cambridge arose as the result of a migration from Oxford, and the German university of Leipzig sprang from that of Prague in Bohemia.
[Ill.u.s.tration: VIEW OF NEW COLLEGE, OXFORD New College, despite its name, is one of the oldest of the Oxford collegiate foundations. It was established in 1379 A.D. by William of Wykeham. The ill.u.s.tration shows the chapel, the cloisters consecrated in 1400 A.D., and the detached tower, a tall, ma.s.sive structure on the line of the city wall.]
COLLEGES
The members of a university usually lived in a number of colleges. These seem to have been at first little more than lodging-houses, where poor students were cared for at the expense of some benefactor. In time, however, as the colleges increased in wealth, through the gifts made to them, they became centers of instruction under the direction of masters.
At Oxford and Cambridge, where the collegiate system has been retained to the present time, each college has its separate buildings and enjoys the privilege of self-government.
FACULTIES
The studies in a medieval university were grouped under the four faculties of arts, theology, law, and medicine. The first-named faculty taught the ”seven liberal arts,” that is, grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music. They formed a legacy from old Roman education. Theology, law, and medicine then, as now, were professional studies, taken up after the completion of the Arts course. Owing to the constant movement of students from one university to another, each inst.i.tution tended to specialize in one or more subjects. Thus, Paris came to be noted for theology, Montpellier, Padua, and Salerno for medicine, and Orleans, Bologna, and Salamanca for law.
[Ill.u.s.tration: TOWER OF MAGDALEN COLLEGE, OXFORD Magdalen (p.r.o.nounced Maudlin) is perhaps the most beautiful college in Oxford. The bell tower stands on High Street, the princ.i.p.al thoroughfare of Oxford, and adjoins Magdalen Bridge, built across the Cherwell. Begun in 1492 A.D.; completed in 1505 A.D. From its summit a Latin hymn is sung every year on the morning of May Day. This graceful tower has been several times imitated in American collegiate structures.]
204. SCHOLASTICISM
THEOLOGICAL STUDY
Theology formed the chief subject of instruction in most medieval universities. Nearly all the celebrated scholars of the age were theologians. They sought to arrange the doctrines of the Church in systematic and reasonable form, in order to answer those great questions concerning the nature of G.o.d and of the soul which have always occupied the human mind. For this purpose it was necessary to call in the aid of philosophy. The union of theology and philosophy produced what is known as scholasticism. [23]
[Ill.u.s.tration: INTERIOR OF KING'S COLLEGE CHAPEL, CAMBRIDGE.
The chief architectural ornament of King's College, founded by King Henry VI, is the chapel in the Gothic perpendicular style.* This building was begun in 1446 A.D., but was not completed until nearly seventy years later. The finest features of the interior are the fan vaulting which extends throughout the chapel, the stained-gla.s.s windows, and the wooden organ screen.]
ABELARD AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
The scholastics were loyal children of the Church and did not presume to question her teaching in matters of religion. They held that faith precedes reason. ”The Christian,” it was said, ”ought to advance to knowledge through faith, not come to faith through knowledge.” The brilliant Abelard, with his keenly critical mind, found what he considered a flaw in this position: on many subjects the authorities themselves disagreed. To show this he wrote a little book called _Sic et Non_ (”Yes and No”), setting forth the conflicting opinions of the Church Fathers on one hundred and fifty-eight points of theology. In such cases how could truth be reached unless one reasoned it out for oneself? ”Constant questioning,” he declared, ”is the key to wisdom.... Through doubting we come to inquiry and through inquiry we perceive the truth.” But this reliance on the unaided human reason as a means of obtaining knowledge did not meet with approval, and Abelard's views were condemned as unsound.
Abelard, indeed, was a man in advance of his age. Freedom of thought had to wait many centuries before its rights should be acknowledged.
STUDY OF ARISTOTLE
The philosophy on which the scholastics relied was chiefly that of Aristotle. [24] Christian Europe read him at first in Latin translations from the Arabic, but versions were later made from Greek copies found in Constantinople and elsewhere in the East. This revival of Aristotle, though it broadened men's minds by acquainting them with the ideas of the greatest of Greek thinkers, had serious drawbacks. It discouraged rather than favored the search for fresh truth. Many scholastics were satisfied to appeal to Aristotle's authority, rather than take the trouble of finding out things for themselves. The story is told of a medieval student who, having detected spots in the sun, announced his discovery to a learned man. ”My son,” said the latter, ”I have read Aristotle many times, and I a.s.sure you there is nothing of the kind mentioned by him. Be certain that the spots which you have seen are in your eyes and not in the sun.”