Part 26 (1/2)

”As a regular?”

”Yes.”

”As a Conservative?”

”Yes.”

I thought a moment and said: ”No, I can never be a Conservative, however it might suit my interest to be so. Try as hard as I might, I should never succeed.”

”That is the only way in which we can make you deputy.”

”Well, it cannot be helped! I must resign myself then to amount to nothing.”

Thanking the Minister for his kindness. Azorin and I walked out of the Ministry of the Interior.

SOCIALISTS

As for Socialists, I have never cared to have anything to do with them.

One of the most offensive things about Socialists, which is more offensive than their pedantry, than their charlatanry, than their hypocrisy, is their inquisitorial instinct for prying into other people's lives. Whether Pablo Iglesias travels first or third cla.s.s, has been for years one of the princ.i.p.al topics of dispute between Socialists and their opponents.

Fifteen years ago I was in Tangier, where I had been sent by the _Globo_, and, upon my return, a newspaper man who had socialistic ideas, reproached me:

”You talk a great deal about the working man, but I see you were living in the best hotel in Tangier.”

I answered: ”In the first place, I have never spoken of the workingman with any fervour. Furthermore, I am not such a slave as to be too cowardly to take what life offers as it comes, as you are. I take what I can that I want, and when I do not take it, it is because I cannot get it.”

LOVE OF THE WORKINGMAN

To gush over the workingman is one of the commonplaces of the day which is utterly false and hypocritical. Just as in the 18th century sympathy was with the simple hearted citizen, so today we talk about the workingman. The term workingman can never be anything but a grammatical common denominator. Among workingmen, as among the bourgeoisie, there are all sorts of people. It is perfectly true that there are certain characteristics, certain defects, which may be exaggerated in a given cla.s.s, because of its special environment and culture. The difference in Spanish cities between the labouring man and the bourgeoisie is not very great. We frequently see the workingman leap the barrier into the bourgeoisie, and then disclose himself as a unique flower of knavery, extortion and misdirected ingenuity. Deep down in the hearts of our revolutionists, I do not believe that there is any real enthusiasm for the workingman.

When the bookshop of Fernando Fe was still fin the Carrera de San Jeronimo, I once heard Blasco Ibanez say with the cheapness that is his distinguis.h.i.+ng trait, laughing meanwhile ostentatiously, that a republic in Spain would mean the rule of shoemakers and of the sc.u.m of the streets.

THE CONVENTIONALIST BARRIOVERO

Barriovero, a conventionalist, according to Grandmontagne--yes, and how keen the scent of this American for such matters!--attended the opening of a radical club in the Calle del Principe with a party of friends. We were all drinking champagne. Like other revolutionists and parvenus generally, Lerroux is a victim of the superst.i.tion of champagne.

”Aha, suppose those workingmen should see us drinking champagne!”