Volume I Part 25 (1/2)
”Who gave thee orders? Or hast thou indeed received any?”
”The Bishops of London and Lincoln, after that I had diligently studied and kept terms aforetime at Cambridge.”
”Humph!” said Sir Roger. ”These bishops be of the reformed sect; and, I have a notion, will some day or another answer for it before the Queen's council.”
”What knowledge hast thou of these men?”
”I never saw them but at the time I received ordination.”
After a few more questions of little moment, the priest threw out the usual net with which his fraternity were wont to entangle those of heretical opinions.[17]
”What is thy belief respecting the sacrament?”
”That is a question of too general and multifarious a nature for a plain and faithful answer.”
”Are the bread and wine, by virtue of the words p.r.o.nounced by the priest, changed into the body and blood of Christ? And is the sacrament, whether reserved or received, the very body and blood of Christ?”
”I am not careful to answer such inquiries, seeing that I am but unskilled and unlearned in scholastic disputes. Why do ye ask me these hard and unprofitable questions, to bring my body in danger of death, and to suck my blood?”
”We are not blood-suckers, and intend none other than to make thee a better man and a good Christian,” said the priest, mightily offended.
Whereat Roger Wrinstone, in his great zeal and affection for the Holy Church, smote Marsh a l.u.s.ty blow on the mouth, saying--
”Answerest thou the priest so? By your wors.h.i.+p's leave I will mend his ill manners.”
The little girl at this rebuke fell a-crying, and her grief became so loud that Sir Roger was fain to pacify her by ordering Wrinstone to stand farther apart. With red and glistening eyes she looked up and smiled at the suffering martyr, who, remembering his own dear babes, could scarce refrain from embracing her as she clung about him, to the great displeasure of Sir Roger.
”Answer this reverend and spiritual admonisher, to the true purport and bearing of his question,” said Sir Roger, with a mighty affectation of sagacity.
”I do believe Christ to be present with His sacrament, inasmuch as He is alway with His people to the end of time. But as I am not skilful in matters of such nicety, I would ask of this reverend casuist, who is more able to answer in questions of such weight than I; who am, as I said before, unlearned in disputed points; and truly I am in nothing more wishful than to come at a right knowledge and understanding of the truth.”
”Say on,” said the priest, something flattered by this modest appeal to his opinion.
”Our Lord took the cup and blessed it, of which He then drank, and afterwards His disciples?”
”Yes. But this doth not sanction its being sent round to the laity,”
replied the priest, not aware of the drift and true bearing of the inquiry.
”Then He took the bread and brake, and did eat likewise with His disciples?”
”Of a truth,” replied the unwary disputant. ”For these questions need but a plain and simple answer.”
”Then,” said Marsh, ”of a surety He must have ate and drank Himself!--Nay,” continued he, seeing the priest turn pale with rage and vexation, ”I can find none other alternative. For, unlearned and unpractised as I am; the absurdity of your belief is manifest.”
”Thou art a child of perdition--an impious and pestilent heretic! Thou eatest and drinkest d.a.m.nation to thyself; and the Holy Church consigns all such to the flames, and to the fire of eternal wrath hereafter!”
roared the infuriate priest, whose choler waxed hotter in proportion as he felt unable to withstand the conclusion of his opponent.
”For,” as it has been observed, even by some of the most enlightened Catholics themselves,[18] ”theological animosity, so far from being an argument of men's conviction in their opposite sects, is a certain proof that they have never reached any serious persuasion with regard to these sublime subjects. Even those who are most impatient of contradiction in other controversies, are mild and moderate in comparison of polemical divines; and whenever a man's knowledge and experience give him a perfect a.s.surance in his own opinion, he regards with contempt rather than anger the opposition and mistakes of others. But while men zealously maintain what they neither clearly comprehend nor entirely believe, they are shaken in their imagined faith by the opposite persuasion, or even doubts of other men, and vent on their antagonists that anger and impatience which is the natural result of this state of the understanding.”
”Master,” cried Wrinstone, ”shall I fetch the bridle that we so oft use for scolds and ill women?”