Part 16 (1/2)
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 211.--Bordure engrailed.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 212.--Bordure invecked.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 213.--Bordure embattled.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 214.--Bordure indented.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 215.--Bordure wavy.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 216.--Bordure nebuly.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 217.--Bordure dovetailed.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 218.--Bordure potente.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 219.--Bordure per pale.]
The bordure has long since ceased to be a mark of cadency in England, but as a mark of distinction the bordure wavy (Fig. 215) is still used to indicate b.a.s.t.a.r.dy. A bordure of England was granted by Royal warrant as an augmentation to H.M. Queen Victoria Eugenie of Spain, on the occasion of her marriage. The use of the bordure is, however, the recognised method of differencing in Scotland, but it is curious that with the Scots the bordure wavy is in no way a mark of illegitimacy. The Scottish bordure for indicating this fact is {140} the bordure compony (Fig. 223), which has been used occasionally for the same purpose in England, but the bordures added to indicate cadency and the various marks to indicate illegitimacy will be discussed in later chapters. The difference should here be observed between the bordure compony (Fig. 223), which means illegitimacy; the bordure counter compony (Fig. 224), which may or may not have that meaning; and the bordure chequy (Fig. 225), which certainly has no relation to b.a.s.t.a.r.dy. In the two former the panes run with the s.h.i.+eld, in the latter the chequers do not. Whilst the bordure as a mark of cadency or illegitimacy surrounds the whole s.h.i.+eld, being superimposed upon even the chief and canton, a bordure when merely a charge gives way to both.
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 220.--Bordure quarterly.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 221.--Bordure gyronny.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 222.--Bordure tierced in pairle.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 223.--Bordure compony.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 224.--Bordure counter compony.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 225.--Bordure chequy.]
A certain rule regarding the bordure is the sole remaining instance in modern heraldry of the formerly recognised practice of conjoining two coats of arms (which it might be necessary to marshal together) by ”dimidiation”
instead of using our present-day method of impalement. To dimidiate two coats of arms, the dexter half of one s.h.i.+eld was conjoined to the sinister half of the other. The objections to such a practice, however, soon made themselves apparent (_e.g._ a dimidiated chevron was scarcely distinguishable from a bend), and the ”dimidiation” of arms was quickly abandoned in favour of {141} ”impalement,” in which the entire designs of both coats of arms are depicted. But in impaling a coat of arms which is surrounded by a bordure, the bordure is not continued down the centre between the two coats, but stops short top and bottom at the palar line.
The same rule, by the way, applies to the tressure, but not to the orle.
The curious fact, however, remains that this rule as to the dimidiation of the bordure in cases of impalement is often found to have been ignored in ancient seals and other examples. The charges upon the bordure are often three, but more usually eight in number, in the latter case being arranged three along the top of the s.h.i.+eld, one at the base point, and two on either side. The number should, however, always be specified, unless (as in a bordure bezantee, &c.) it is immaterial; in which case the number eight must be _exceeded_ in emblazoning the s.h.i.+eld. The rule as to colour upon colour does not hold and seems often to be ignored in the cases of bordures, noticeably when these occur as marks of Scottish cadency.
THE ORLE
The orle (Fig. 226), or, as it was originally termed in ancient British rolls of arms, ”un faux ecusson,” is a narrow bordure following the exact outline of the s.h.i.+eld, but within it, showing the field (for at least the width usually occupied by a bordure) between the outer edge of the orle and the edge of the escutcheon. An orle is about half the width of a bordure, rather less than more, but the proportion is never very exactly maintained.
The difference may be noted between this figure and the next (Fig. 227), which shows an inescutcheon within a bordure.
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 226.--Orle.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 227.--An inescutcheon within a bordure.]
Though both forms are very seldom so met with, an orle may be subject to the usual lines of part.i.tion, and may also be charged. Examples of both these variations are met with in the arms of Yeatman-Biggs, and the arms of Gladstone afford an instance of an orle ”flory.” The arms of Knox, Earl of Ranfurly, are: Gules, a falcon volant or, within an orle wavy on the outer and engrailed on the inner edge argent.
When a series of charges are placed round the edges of the {142} escutcheon (_theoretically_ in the position occupied by the orle, but as a matter of actual fact usually more in the position occupied by the bordure), they are said to be ”in orle,” which is the correct term, but they will often be found blazoned ”an orle of (_e.g._) martlets or mounds.”