Part 13 (1/2)

CONCERNING CHARLES LAMB

PERSONS ONE WOULD WISH TO HAVE SEEN [Sidenote: _William Hazlitt_]

... ”There is one person,” said a shrill, querulous voice, ”I would rather see than all these--Don Quixote!”

”Come, come!” said Hunt; ”I thought we should have no heroes, real or fabulous. What say you, Mr. Lamb? Are you for eking out your shadowy list with such names as Alexander, Julius Caesar, Tamerlane, or Genghis Khan?”

”Excuse me,” said Lamb; ”on the subject of characters in active life, plotters and disturbers of the world, I have a crotchet of my own, which I beg leave to reserve.”

”No, no! come out with your worthies!”

”What do you think of Guy Fawkes and Judas Iscariot?”

Hunt turned an eye upon him like a wild Indian, but cordial and full of smothered glee. ”Your most exquisite reason!” was echoed on all sides; and all thought that Lamb had now fairly entangled himself.

”Why, I cannot but think,” retorted he of the wistful countenance, ”that Guy Fawkes, that poor, fluttering, annual scarecrow of straw and rags, is an ill-used gentleman. I would give something to see him sitting pale and emaciated, surrounded by his matches and his barrels of gunpowder, and expecting the moment that was to transport him to Paradise for his heroic self-devotion; but if I say any more, there is that fellow G.o.dwin will make something of it. And as to Judas Iscariot, my reason is different. I would fain see the face of him who, having dipped his hand in the same dish with the Son of Man, could afterwards betray Him. I have no conception of such a thing; nor have I ever seen any picture (not even Leonardo's very fine one) that gave me the least idea of it.”

”You have said enough, Mr. Lamb, to justify your choice.”

”Oh! ever right, Menenius--ever right!”

”There is only one person I can ever think of after this,” continued Lamb; but without mentioning a name that once put on a semblance of mortality. ”If Shakespeare was to come into the room, we should all rise up to meet him; but if that person was to come into it, we should all fall down and try to kiss the hem of his garment.”

HAYDON'S IMMORTAL NIGHT [Sidenote: _B.R. Haydon_]

On December 28th the immortal dinner came off in my painting-room, with Jerusalem towering up behind us as a background. Wordsworth was in fine cue, and we had a glorious set-to--on Homer, Shakespeare, Milton, and Virgil. Lamb got exceedingly merry and exquisitely witty; and his fun in the midst of Wordsworth's solemn intonations of oratory was like the sarcasm and wit of the fool in the intervals of Lear's pa.s.sion. He made a speech and voted me absent, and made them drink my health. ”Now,” said Lamb, ”you old lake poet, you rascally poet, why do you call Voltaire dull?” We all defended Wordsworth, and affirmed there was a state of mind when Voltaire would be dull. ”Well,” said Lamb, ”here's Voltaire--the Messiah of the French nation, and a very proper one too.”

He then, in a strain of humour beyond description, abused me for putting Newton's head into my picture--”a fellow,” said he, ”who believed nothing unless it was as clear as the three sides of a triangle.” And then he and Keats agreed he had destroyed all the poetry of the rainbow by reducing it to the prismatic colours. It was impossible to resist him, and we all drank ”Newton's health, and confusion to mathematics.”

It was delightful to see the good-humour of Wordsworth in giving in to all our frolics without affectation, and laughing as heartily as the best of us.

By this time other friends joined, amongst them poor Ritchie, who was going to penetrate by Fezzan to Timbuctoo. I introduced him to all as ”a gentleman going to Africa.” Lamb seemed to take no notice; but all of a sudden he roared out, ”Which is the gentleman we are going to lose?” We then drank the victim's health, in which Ritchie joined.

In the morning of this delightful day, a gentleman, a perfect stranger, had called on me. He said he knew my friends, had an enthusiasm for Wordsworth, and begged I would procure him the happiness of an introduction. He told me he was a comptroller of stamps, and often had correspondence with the poet. I thought it a liberty; but still, as he seemed a gentleman, I told him he might come.

When we retired to tea we found the comptroller. Introducing him to Wordsworth, I forgot to say who he was. After a little time the comptroller looked down, looked up and said to Wordsworth, ”Don't you think, sir, Milton was a great genius?” Keats looked at me, Wordsworth looked at the comptroller. Lamb, who was dozing by the fire, turned round and said, ”Pray, sir, did you say Milton was a great genius?” ”No, sir; I asked Mr. Wordsworth if he were not.” ”Oh,” said Lamb, ”then you are a silly fellow.” ”Charles! my dear Charles!” said Wordsworth; but Lamb, perfectly innocent of the confusion he had created, was off again by the fire.

After an awful pause the comptroller said, ”Don't you think Newton a great genius?” I could not stand it any longer. Keats put his head into my books. Ritchie squeezed in a laugh. Wordsworth seemed asking himself, ”Who is this?” Lamb got up, and, taking a candle, said, ”Sir, will you allow me to look at your phrenological development?” He then turned his back on the poor man, and at every question of the comptroller he chaunted:

”Diddle diddle dumpling, my son John, Went to bed with his breeches on.”

The man in office, finding Wordsworth did not know who he was, said in a spasmodic and half-chuckling antic.i.p.ation of a.s.sured victory, ”I have had the honour of some correspondence with you, Mr. Wordsworth.” ”With me, sir?” said Wordsworth, ”not that I remember.” ”Don't you, sir? I am a comptroller of stamps.” There was a dead silence--the comptroller evidently thinking that was enough. While we were waiting for Wordsworth's reply, Lamb sung out:

”Hey diddle fiddle, The cat and the fiddle.”

”My dear Charles!” said Wordsworth--

”Diddle, diddle dumpling, my son John”--