Part 15 (1/2)
[305] Luke 22:28.
[306] Luke 22:28.
[307] Heb. 4:14, 15.
[308] Heb. 5:8.
CHAPTER 11.
FROM JUDEA TO GALILEE.
THE BAPTIST'S TESTIMONY OF JESUS.
During the period of our Lord's retirement in the wilderness the Baptist continued his ministry, crying repentance to all who would pause to hear, and administering baptism to such as came duly prepared and asking with right intent. The people generally were greatly concerned over the ident.i.ty of John; and as the real import of the voice[309] dawned upon them, their concern deepened into fear. The ever recurring question was, Who is this new prophet? Then the Jews, by which expression we may understand the rulers of the people, sent a delegation of priests and Levites of the Pharisaic party to personally question him. He answered without evasion, ”I am not the Christ,” and with equal decisiveness denied that he was Elias, or more accurately, Elijah, the prophet who, the rabbis said through a misinterpretation of Malachi's prediction, was to return to earth as the immediate precursor of the Messiah.[310]
Furthermore, he declared that he was not ”that prophet,” by which was meant the Prophet whose coming Moses had foretold,[311] and who was not universally identified in the Jewish mind with the expected Messiah.
”Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.”[312] The Pharisaic envoys then demanded of him his authority for baptizing; in reply he affirmed that the validity of his baptisms would be attested by One who even then was amongst them, though they knew Him not, and averred: ”He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.”[313]
John's testimony, that Jesus was the Redeemer of the world, was declared as boldly as had been his message of the imminent coming of the Lord.
”Behold the Lamb of G.o.d, which taketh away the sin of the world,” he proclaimed; and, that none might fail to comprehend his identification of the Christ, he added: ”This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.”[314] That the attestation of the ministering presence of the Holy Ghost through the material appearance ”like a dove”
was convincing to John is shown by his further testimony: ”And John bare record saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of G.o.d.”[315] On the day following that of the utterance last quoted, John repeated his testimony to two of his disciples, or followers, as, Jesus pa.s.sed, saying again: ”Behold the Lamb of G.o.d.”[316]
THE FIRST DISCIPLES OF JESUS.[317]
Two of the Baptist's followers, specifically called disciples, were with him when for the second time he expressly designated Jesus as the Lamb of G.o.d. These were Andrew and John; the latter came to be known in after years as the author of the fourth Gospel. The first is mentioned by name, while the narrator suppresses his own name as that of the second disciple. Andrew and John were so impressed by the Baptist's testimony that they immediately followed Jesus; and He, turning toward them asked: ”What seek ye?” Possibly somewhat embarra.s.sed by the question, or with a real desire to learn where He might be found later, they replied by another inquiry: ”Rabbi, where dwellest thou?” Their use of the t.i.tle Rabbi was a mark of honor and respect, to which Jesus did not demur. His courteous reply to their question a.s.sured them that their presence was no unwelcome intrusion. ”Come and see,” said He.[318] The two young men accompanied Him, and remained with Him to learn more. Andrew, filled with wonder and joy over the interview so graciously accorded, and thrilled with the spirit of testimony that had been enkindled within his soul, hastened to seek his brother Simon, to whom he said: ”We have found the Messias.” He brought Simon to see and hear for himself; and Jesus, looking upon Andrew's brother, called him by name and added an appellation of distinction by which he was destined to be known throughout all later history: ”Thou art Simon the son of Jona; thou shalt be called Cephas.” The new name thus bestowed is the Aramaic or Syro-Chaldaic equivalent of the Greek ”Petros,” and of the present English ”Peter,” meaning ”a stone.”[319]
On the following day Jesus set out for Galilee, possibly accompanied by some or all of his newly-made disciples; and on the way He found a man named Philip, in whom He recognized another choice son of Israel. Unto Philip He said: ”Follow me.” It was customary with rabbis and other teachers of that time to strive for popularity, that many might be drawn to them to sit at their feet and be known as their disciples. Jesus, however, selected His own immediate a.s.sociates; and, as He found them and discerned in them the spirits who, in their preexistent state had been chosen for the earthly mission of the apostles.h.i.+p, He summoned them. They were the servants; He was the Master.[320]
Philip soon found his friend Nathanael, to whom he testified that He of whom Moses and the prophets had written had at last been found; and that He was none other than Jesus of Nazareth. Nathanael, as his later history demonstrates, was a righteous man, earnest in his hope and expectation of the Messiah, yet seemingly imbued with the belief common throughout Jewry--that the Christ was to come in royal state as seemed befitting the Son of David. The mention of such a One coming from Nazareth, the reputed son of a humble carpenter, provoked wonder if not incredulity in the guileless mind of Nathanael, and he exclaimed: ”Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?” Philip's answer was a repet.i.tion of Christ's words to Andrew and John--”Come and see.”
Nathanael left his seat under the fig tree,[321] where Philip had found him, and went to see for himself. As he approached, Jesus said: ”Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” Nathanael saw that Jesus could read his mind, and asked in surprize: ”Whence knowest thou me?” In reply Jesus showed even greater powers of penetration and perception under conditions that made ordinary observation unlikely if not impossible: ”Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.” Nathanael replied with conviction: ”Rabbi, thou art the Son of G.o.d; thou art the King of Israel.” Earnest as the man's testimony was, it rested mainly on his recognition of what he took to be a supernatural power in Jesus; our Lord a.s.sured him that he should see yet greater things: ”And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of G.o.d ascending and descending upon the Son of man.”
”THE SON OF MAN.”
In the promise and prediction made by Christ to Nathanael, we find the significant t.i.tle--The Son of Man--appearing for the first time, chronologically speaking, in the New Testament. It recurs, however, about forty times, excluding repet.i.tions in parallel accounts in the several Gospels. In each of these pa.s.sages it is used by the Savior distinctively to designate Himself. In three other instances the t.i.tle appears in the New Testament, outside the Gospels; and in each case it is applied to the Christ with specific reference to His exalted attributes as Lord and G.o.d.[322]
In the Old Testament, the phrase ”son of man” occurs in ordinary usage, denoting any human son[323] and it appears over ninety times as an appellation by which Jehovah addressed Ezekiel, though it is never applied by the prophet to himself.[324] The context of the pa.s.sages in which Ezekiel is addressed as ”son of man” indicates the divine intention of emphasizing the human status of the prophet as contrasted with the divinity of Jehovah.
The t.i.tle is used in connection with the record of Daniel's vision,[325]
in which was revealed the consummation, yet future, when Adam--the Ancient of Days--shall sit to judge his posterity;[326] on which great occasion, the Son of Man is to appear and receive a dominion that shall be everlasting, transcendently superior to that of the Ancient of Days, and embracing every people and nation, all of whom shall serve the Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of Man.[327]
In applying the designation to Himself, the Lord invariably uses the definite article. ”_The_ Son of Man” was and is, specifically and exclusively, Jesus Christ. While as a matter of solemn certainty He was the only male human being from Adam down who was not the son of a mortal man, He used the t.i.tle in a way to conclusively demonstrate that it was peculiarly and solely His own. It is plainly evident that the expression is fraught with a meaning beyond that conveyed by the words in common usage. The distinguis.h.i.+ng appellation has been construed by many to indicate our Lord's humble station as a mortal, and to connote that He stood as the type of humanity, holding a particular and unique relations.h.i.+p to the entire human family. There is, however, a more profound significance attaching to the Lord's use of the t.i.tle ”The Son of Man”; and this lies in the fact that He knew His Father to be the one and only supremely exalted Man,[328] whose Son Jesus was both in spirit and in body--the Firstborn among all the spirit-children of the Father, the Only Begotten in the flesh--and therefore in sense applicable to Himself alone, He was and is the Son of the ”Man of Holiness,”
Elohim,[329] the Eternal Father. In His distinctive t.i.tles of Sons.h.i.+p, Jesus expressed His spiritual and bodily descent from, and His filial submission to, that exalted Father.
As revealed to Enoch the Seer, ”Man of Holiness” is one of the names by which G.o.d the Eternal Father is known; ”and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man, even Jesus Christ.” We learn further that the Father of Jesus Christ thus proclaimed Himself to Enoch: ”Behold, I am G.o.d; Man of Holiness is my name; Man of Counsel is my name; and Endless and Eternal is my name, also.”[330] ”The Son of Man” is in great measure synonymous with ”The Son of G.o.d,” as a t.i.tle denoting divinity, glory, and exaltation; for the ”Man of Holiness,” whose Son Jesus Christ reverently acknowledges Himself to be, is G.o.d the Eternal Father.
THE MIRACLE AT CANA IN GALILEE.