Part 15 (2/2)

[38: Park, 502; Sewell _v_. Royal Exchange a.s.surance Co. 4 Taunt. 856; Wilson _v_. Marryat, 8 T. Rep. 31.]

[39: Willison _v_. Patterson, 7 Taunt. 439; _Vide_ Note on the War Bill Act, at the end of this part.]

[40: Per Gibbs, C.J. Antoine _v._ Morshead, 6 Taunt. 238. According to Mr. Serjeant Byles, a bill drawn by a British prisoner in favour of an alien enemy cannot be enforced by the payee. He cites no case in support of this a.s.sertion; but on the principle of the last case cited, if it were drawn for _subsistence and not for trade_, there seems to be no reason why it should not be legal.]

[41: Duhamel _v._ Pickering, 2 Starkie, 92.]

[42: Barker _v._ Hodgson, 3 M. & S. 270.]

[43: Liddard _v._ Lopes, 10 East. 526; Abbot, on s.h.i.+pping, 596.]

[44: 1 Kent's Com. 248; The Hiram, 3 Rob. Adm. 189.]

[45: 1 Kent's Com., 249.]

[46: Hadley _v._ Clarke, 8 T.R. 259; 3 Kent's Com. 249.]

[47: Abbot, on s.h.i.+pping, 599.]

[48: Pothier, Trait du Cout. de Joc. No. 140.]

[49: Story, on Partners.h.i.+p, pp. 447, 448.]

[50: Griswold _v._ Waddington, 16 Johns. Rep. U.S.]

[51: Story, on Partners.h.i.+p, 447.]

[52: Story, on Partners.h.i.+p, 449; Griswold _v._ Waddington, 15 Johns, 57; 16 Johns, 438.]

[53: Platt, on Covenants, 588; Doe _d._ Lord Anglesea _v._ Ch. Wardens of Rugely, 6 Q.B. 113, and cases there cited.]

[54: Cosmopolite, 4 Rob. 10, 11, in note.]

[55: 1 Term. R. Gist. _v._ Mason.]

[56: Per Buller, J. Bell _v._ Gilson, 1 Bos. _v._. Pull.]

[57: Case of Bella Guidita, cited 1 Rob. Adm. Rep. 207.]

[58: 1 Kent, p. 73]

[58: 1 Kent, p. 73]

[59: Per Eyre, C.J. Sparenburgh _v._ Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 168.]

[60: Sparenburgh _v._ Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 163.]

<script>