Part 5 (1/2)
The special mark of true neuralgic pain in the abdominal pneumogastric, as distinguished from other deep-seated pains in the epigastrium, is the remarkably direct relation of its severity to the patient's exhaustion, particularly in regard to the weakness induced by want of food. While the great majority of dyspeptic pains are increased by filling the stomach, gastralgia, on the contrary, is invariably relieved by food, often most strikingly and completely. Pressure from without, also, while it aggravates most pains dependent on local organic mischief, nearly always more or less relieves gastralgia. Equally striking is the comfort given by stimulants, especially by hot brandy-and-water; in this respect gastralgia resembles colic. There is something special in the degree of mental depression which attends gastralgic pain. In this it resembles the pains of hypochondriasis, but there is a resilience of the spirits when the pain has been relieved which is not seen in the latter affection. A very frequent complication of gastralgia is severe palpitation of the heart, but during the paroxysm itself the pulse, whether rapid or not, is commonly small, at first tense, and afterward soft, but not acquiring any considerable volume till the pain has ceased.
So severe is the pain, and so complete the mental and physical prostration in bad attacks of gastralgia, that the first aspect of the patient might suggest--indeed often has suggested--the occurrence of gastric or duodenal perforation; but, as soon as the paroxysm is over all the alarming appearances vanish, leaving only a certain amount of tenderness on deep pressure. In the more typical cases there are no signs of dyspepsia whatever, no fulness nor excessive redness of the tongue, no nausea, regurgitation of food, nor pyrosis. Occasionally the neuralgic affection is complicated with more or less gastric catarrh; but this is a much rarer occurrence, in my experience, than some writers would lead one to believe; and, moreover, where a certain amount of organic disorder of the stomach is observed, it is usually a mere secondary result of the neuralgia. The most severe example of gastralgia which I ever saw was entirely unaccompanied by dyspepsia; this patient absolutely attempted suicide to escape from his agonizing pains, which recurred with the greatest frequency and obstinacy, but were at last entirely removed by strychnia. In another patient whose very interesting case will be again alluded to under the head of Complications of Neuralgia, violent abdominal pneumogastric pain was succeeded by a severe attack of trigeminal neuralgia, accompanied by inflammation of the eye, which inflicted irreparable damage; here, too, the gastralgia was entirely uncomplicated by any other stomach-symptoms.
_Cerebral Neuralgia._--We enter, here, on an extremely obscure and doubtful subject: Can there be pain in the central ma.s.ses of the encephalon? There are undoubtedly a not inconsiderable number of cases of pain, neuralgic in type on the whole, in which the suffering cannot be referred to any recognizable superficial nerve. It seems deeply situated within the cranium. I have also quoted cases of Dr. Hillier's in which not merely was there deep-seated headache in children, but there was something like a characteristic general change observed in the brain-tissues after death, viz., a great moisture and softness of texture. Notwithstanding all this, I am not convinced, nor indeed much disposed to believe, that pain is ever felt in the structure of the brain; I rather believe that, in the cases where this seems to occur, the pain is either in the intracranial portion of the nerve trunks, or, far more probably, in the twigs of nerves that are distributed to the cerebral membranes. In that case they are, strictly speaking, only varieties of neuralgia of the fifth nerve, and might have been properly discussed under that heading; but it is more convenient to speak of them apart, since their phenomena present considerable differences from those of the external neuralgias of the head and face.
I have now seen several of these cases of intracranial neuralgias, and very perplexing and (at first sight) alarming they certainly are. The first of these cases came under my care in 1868. The patient was a single lady who had greatly over-tasked an intellect that was not, perhaps, originally very strong, by trying to do hack literature on conscientious principles; insisting, for instance, on knowing something about every subject she wrote upon. Her age was thirty-eight when she applied to me; menstruation was scanty but regular; and, on the whole, she could not be said to have pa.s.sed an unhealthy life, although ”nervous-headaches” and ”sick-headaches” had occasionally beset her.
This time the trouble seemed to be more serious. Ten days before applying to me, she had awaked in the morning with a feeling that something was very wrong in her head; there was not so much pain as a dull, brooding sort of weight, felt deeply within the cranium, and rather anteriorly. This had not lasted many hours when she was seized with a sensation of intense cold, amounting almost to rigors, and then before long was suddenly attacked with acute splitting pain in the same situation as the feeling of weight already mentioned had occupied. This pain, which came and went, or rather intensified and remitted, without ever completely ceasing, lasted about two hours, and then rather suddenly disappeared, leaving the patient with a deep ”bruised and sore feeling in her brains.” The pain recurred about the middle of the next day, lasting for several hours, and again leaving behind it the sore feeling. Day by day the paroxysms returned, and, on the day before her visit to me, the patient had, she told me, been driven frantic by her sufferings and had become actually delirious. Her appearance, when I first saw her, was wretched; the face haggard, both eyes sunken and surrounded with deep rings of dusky pigment, both conjunctivae bloodshot, the whole face almost earthy in its pallor. At that hour (11 A. M.) the pain had not positively recommenced, but she was in momentary dread of its recurrence. She complained of giddiness, muscae volitantes, and great feebleness of vision, and dreaded attempting to read, as the mere effort of fixing her eyes on anything intently caused flashes of fire before them. It was difficult at first to believe that there was not some serious organic brain-mischief; but on the whole I concluded that there was an absence of any genuine symptoms of such disease. At the same time, the pain was decidedly not referred to any cutaneous sensory nerve; and on the whole it appeared probable that the affection was intracranial. There remained the diagnosis of meningeal neuralgia, and to this I provisionally made up my mind. The opinion that the pain did not depend on any fixed organic disease was decisively justified by the results of treatment. One-sixth of a grain of morphia was injected on the occasion of the first visit, and this was repeated every day, and sometimes twice a day, for a fortnight; by this sole means, with rest, quietude, and light nouris.h.i.+ng food, the patient was brought to comparative convalescence. The injections were then gradually discontinued, and she got quite well.
In a second case, which presented itself in the out-patient room at Westminster Hospital, a young man of markedly-nervous temperament, who had been somewhat given to drink, complained of similarly deep-seated intermittent pain, which he referred, however, to a point nearer the back of the head. He suffered, also, from vertigo, especially after unusually long paroxysms. Blisters to the nape of the neck, and a few subcutaneous injections of morphia, removed the pain and the vertigo completely.
A third example was that of a gentleman, aged thirty-four, who was sent over from the neighborhood of Sydney, Australia, to see me. Here, also, there was deep-seated intracranial neuralgic pain of the most severe kind, which greatly alarmed his local medical attendants; and it was only after a great many remedies had been tried that one medical man gave the opinion that the disease was ”neuralgia of the membranes of the brain,” and employed the hypodermic injection of morphia. This treatment at once gave great relief, though the pain had been so severe as to cause delirium on several occasions. In order to get thoroughly re-established, he was sent to England, and desired to consult me. As was expected, the voyage proved of the greatest service, as he hardly suffered at all while on the water. On arriving in England he was at first well, but in a week or two began to feel somewhat below par, and one morning, feeling an attack of pain coming on, he came to me. He was a tall and strongly-built man, with nothing peculiar in his appearance except a certain languor and heaviness of the eyes. He appeared to have lived somewhat freely and to have smoked decidedly to excess. His description of the attacks left no doubt of their neuralgic character, and in other respects they seemed quite a.n.a.logous to the other cases mentioned above, except in one thing, that there seemed a good deal of evidence tending to show a bad local influence in the air of that part of Australia where he usually resided. Almost any change from that had always done him good, though nothing had done anything like so much as the voyage to England. On the occasion of his first visit to me I injected him with one-sixth grain acetate of morphia, thereby stopping the pain. I prescribed muriate of iron and minute doses of strychnia, which he took for some little time, but the pain never recurred during his stay in England and on the Continent. Unfortunately, as he was anxious to return to Australia, I permitted him to do so, after a stay in the Old World of only three or four months; but, very shortly indeed after his return to Sydney, his old complaint attacked him. This time, unhappily, the hypodermic morphia has proved merely palliative, and I have latterly heard very bad accounts from him; still, there has been nothing to throw doubt on the neuralgic character of the disease.
In reflecting upon the anatomy of the nervous branches to the dura mater, I have formed the opinion that there are two situations, one anterior and the other posterior, in which intracranial neuralgia may occur; the former at the giving off of Arnold's recurrent branch from the ophthalmic division, near the sella turcica, the other in the peripheral twigs of this same branch, distributed to the tentorium cerebelli.
_Pharyngeal Neuralgia._--A rather common and extremely troublesome form of neuralgia is that which attacks the pharynx. It is very much more common in women than in men, and especially in hysterical persons. The pain commonly commences in a not very acute manner; it may be felt for some days, or even weeks, as a dull aching, coming and going pretty much in accordance with the patient's state of fatigue, or of reinvigoration after meals, etc. Some trivial circ.u.mstance, such as a slightly extra degree of exhaustion, or the influence of some depressing emotion, will then change the type to that of decided neuralgia, which may become extremely severe. Nothing is more annoying, and even distressing, than the suffering itself, besides which there are abnormal sensations in the throat which almost irresistibly compel the patient to believe that there are severe inflammation and ulceration, and that the throat is in danger of being closed up. Although the pain is usually one-sided, it sometimes affects both sides, and is felt also at the back of the pharynx. The act of swallowing being painful, there is the greater suspicion of inflammation or ulceration, but careful observation shows that a large bolus of food is swallowed with as little, if not less, pain than a small mouthful of solids or even liquids.
Pharyngeal neuralgia must, I think, be considered mainly an affection of the glosso-pharyngeal nerve; the evidence for this is found in the distribution of the pain. A slight degree of the neuralgia will only involve some one or two points in or behind the tonsil; but, when the pain is strongly developed, it will be found to radiate into the tongue, in one direction, and into the neck (following the course of the carotid) in another, besides spreading well into the region occupied by the pharyngeal plexus. One disagreeable reflex effect of severe pharyngeal neuralgia consists in involuntary movements of the muscles of deglut.i.tion, another is seen in the copious outpouring of thick mucus similar to that which collects in the pharynx and oesophagus when a foreign substance has become impacted.
_Laryngeal neuralgia_ concentrates itself mainly in the twigs of the superior laryngeal branch of the pneumogastric which are distributed to the arytaeno-epiglottidean folds, the epiglottis, and the chordae vocales; more rarely a neuralgia is developed lower down, within the cavity of the larynx, apparently in one or more of the scanty twigs to the mucous membrane supplied by the recurrent laryngeal.
Pure neuralgias of the larynx, like those of the pharynx, are more common in women, and especially in weakly hysterical women, than in men.
They are easily excited and greatly aggravated by movements of the parts, and thus it happens that, among men, by far the most numerous subjects of laryngeal neuralgia are found among clergymen, professional singers, and others whose occupation compels them to strenuous and fatiguing employment of the laryngeal muscles. It is rather a singular and striking fact, however, that the so-called ”clergyman's sore-throat,” which is characterized by most unpleasant sensations, and by a more or less complete loss of voice, is not, in the majority of cases, attended with any distinct laryngeal neuralgia. It seems that a predisposition to neuralgia is a necessary element in the latter affection.
FOOTNOTES:
[3] ”Gunshot Wounds and other Injuries to Nerves.” Philadelphia: Lippincott & Co., 1864.
[4] _Med. Times and Gazette_, March 26, 1864.
[5] ”London Hosp. Reports,” 1866.
[6] ”Stimulants and Narcotics,” Macmillan, 1854, p. 86.
[7] Trousseau, Clinique Medicale. Vanlair, ”Des dieffrentes Formes du Nevralgies,” Journ de Med. de Bruxelles, tome xl.
[8] Amer. Jour. Med. Science. Jan. 1850.
[9] ”Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels.” Third edition, 1862.
[10] _Gaz. des Hop._, 114, 117, 120. 1862.
[11] _Wien Med. Presse_, xxiv., 1866; Syd. Soc. Yearbook, 1865-'66, p.
120.
[12] Berlin Klin. Woch., 1865; Syd. Soc. Yearbook, 1865-'66, p. 120.
[13] See Wahn, _Journ. de Med. et Chir. Prat._ 1854. Also several original and quoted cases in Dr. Handfield Jones's ”Functional Nervous Disorders,” second edition, 1870.