Part 6 (1/2)

”True,” rejoined the major.

The committee here adjourned for a few minutes to tea and sandwiches.

On the discussion being renewed, ”Gentlemen,” said Barbicane, ”we must now take into consideration the metal to be employed.

Our cannon must be possessed of great tenacity, great hardness, be infusible by heat, indissoluble, and inoxidable by the corrosive action of acids.”

”There is no doubt about that,” replied the major; ”and as we shall have to employ an immense quant.i.ty of metal, we shall not be at a loss for choice.”

”Well, then,” said Morgan, ”I propose the best alloy hitherto known, which consists of one hundred parts of copper, twelve of tin, and six of bra.s.s.”

”I admit,” replied the president, ”that this composition has yielded excellent results, but in the present case it would be too expensive, and very difficult to work. I think, then, that we ought to adopt a material excellent in its way and of low price, such as cast iron. What is your advice, major?”

”I quite agree with you,” replied Elphinstone.

”In fact,” continued Barbicane, ”cast iron costs ten times less than bronze; it is easy to cast, it runs readily from the moulds of sand, it is easy of manipulation, it is at once economical of money and of time. In addition, it is excellent as a material, and I well remember that during the war, at the siege of Atlanta, some iron guns fired one thousand rounds at intervals of twenty minutes without injury.”

”Cast iron is very brittle, though,” replied Morgan.

”Yes, but it possesses great resistance. I will now ask our worthy secretary to calculate the weight of a cast-iron gun with a bore of nine feet and a thickness of six feet of metal.”

”In a moment,” replied Maston. Then, das.h.i.+ng off some algebraical formulae with marvelous facility, in a minute or two he declared the following result:

”The cannon will weigh 68,040 tons. And, at two cents a pound, it will cost----”

”Two million five hundred and ten thousand seven hundred and one dollars.”

Maston, the major, and the general regarded Barbicane with uneasy looks.

”Well, gentlemen,” replied the president, ”I repeat what I said yesterday. Make yourselves easy; the millions will not be wanting.”

With this a.s.surance of their president the committee separated, after having fixed their third meeting for the following evening.

CHAPTER IX

THE QUESTION OF THE POWDERS

There remained for consideration merely the question of powders.

The public awaited with interest its final decision. The size of the projectile, the length of the cannon being settled, what would be the quant.i.ty of powder necessary to produce impulsion?

It is generally a.s.serted that gunpowder was invented in the fourteenth century by the monk Schwartz, who paid for his grand discovery with his life. It is, however, pretty well proved that this story ought to be ranked among the legends of the middle ages. Gunpowder was not invented by any one; it was the lineal successor of the Greek fire, which, like itself, was composed of sulfur and saltpeter. Few persons are acquainted with the mechanical power of gunpowder. Now this is precisely what is necessary to be understood in order to comprehend the importance of the question submitted to the committee.

A litre of gunpowder weighs about two pounds; during combustion it produces 400 litres of gas. This gas, on being liberated and acted upon by temperature raised to 2,400 degrees, occupies a s.p.a.ce of 4,000 litres: consequently the volume of powder is to the volume of gas produced by its combustion as 1 to 4,000.

One may judge, therefore, of the tremendous pressure on this gas when compressed within a s.p.a.ce 4,000 times too confined.

All this was, of course, well known to the members of the committee when they met on the following evening.

The first speaker on this occasion was Major Elphinstone, who had been the director of the gunpowder factories during the war.