Part 20 (1/2)

”May I add that I went to the Dardanelles in a transport with over a thousand of your brave soldiers, many of whom were returning to the Peninsula after having already been wounded. It is impossible to speak too highly of their gallantry, and of the splendid spirit they displayed. I need not tell you that I heard of their fighting qualities at the front, since their heroic deeds in this campaign have already become a matter of history.

”Yours sincerely, ”(Signed) COURTAULD THOMSON,

”_Chief Commissioner for British Red Cross and Order of St. John, Malta, Egypt, and Near East Commission._”

[_Copy_]

EXTRACT FROM A REPORT FROM LIEUT.-COLONEL SIR COURTAULD THOMSON, CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF THE BRITISH RED CROSS AND ORDER OF ST.

JOHN, TO THE HON. ARTHUR STANLEY, DATED MAY 25, 1915.

”A striking feature in Cairo is the remarkable work which is being done by the Australian Red Cross. They have not only two exceptionally large hospitals and the large convalescent home, but they supply the motor transport for the wounded for the whole of Egypt. They have also very large Red Cross stores which they have brought with them. With these articles they have been more than generous, and I am informed that they have given away to the hospitals for our own troops something like 75 per cent. of whatever they had.”

EXTRACT FROM CORPS ORDERS, MARCH 28, 1915

”_Appreciation._--The D.M.S. Egypt, who visited the Hospital yesterday afternoon, has requested the Officer Commanding to convey to the officers, nurses, N.C.O.s, and men in the Hospital his appreciation of the work done and the thorough character of the organisation.”

EXTRACT FROM CORPS ORDERS, MAY 1, 1915

”_Appreciation._--The D.M.S. Egypt, Surgeon-General Ford, witnessed the detraining of the invalids who arrived here Wednesday evening. He asked Major Barrett to convey to the Officer Commanding his great appreciation of the excellence of the arrangements and the efficient and quiet manner in which the work was done.

”He congratulates officers and men on the splendid work they are doing and requests that it shall be communicated to them in Corps Orders.”

Looking back, does it not seem essential that these hospitals should have been formed, at all events in outline, in time of peace? That their commanding officers and essential staff should have been marked out beforehand, so that on the declaration of war the gaps could have been filled in from the reserve without difficulty? Satisfactory appointments are much less likely to be made in the turmoil which follows the declaration of war than in the atmosphere of deliberate calm which prevails in time of peace. Had such an arrangement prevailed, the First Australian General Hospital would certainly never have been recruited from three States distant from one another hundreds of miles.

Finally, Australian hospitals in time of war should either be regarded as responsible solely to the Australian military authorities and Government, or handed over without reserve to the R.A.M.C., and placed entirely under the control of the British authorities. Where two different authorities exist, as in the case of the First General Hospital, a large amount of trouble and delay is almost certain to ensue. The adoption of the latter course is in our judgment absolutely essential if efficiency is to be secured.

As is invariably the case, weaknesses in any system are only revealed by costly experience. But while in the Australian Medical Service the experience need not have been so costly, we can at least profit by what has occurred, and frame a stronger and a better policy for the future.

[Ill.u.s.tration: AUSTRALIAN CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, AL HAYAT, HELOUAN.

_To face page 204_]]

On the whole, the record of work done in most trying circ.u.mstances is, we think, satisfactory. It is true that the universal democratic fault was evidenced in the lack of preparation for conditions which were fairly obvious. Nevertheless the adaptability and growth of the hospitals in time of great emergency were achievements of the highest order.

Yet it would be unwise to leave the subject with the usual Anglo-Saxon expression of satisfaction that the crisis was pa.s.sed. The history reviewed has too deep a significance. It must be regarded not merely as an individual incident, but as an indication of the inefficiency evidenced by too many departments of the Empire.

The causes which found the medical services unprepared, which forced them to expand to the breaking-point, and which led to the criticism of the hospital authorities, are not departmental or sectional--they are national. If attacks on individuals are permitted, initiative will be stifled; if on the other hand we are content to follow the time-worn policy of ”muddling through,” the virile people who skirt the border lines of our Empire will sooner or later bid us make way for stronger men.

Our policy for the future must be one of scientific organisation and calculated preparation in every department. We must not only appoint capable administrators, but also trust them. We can again, if we like, obtain that temporary mental tranquillity which comes to a democracy--and to an ostrich--which does not or will not see the calamity which threatens it, but temporary beat.i.tude will be purchased at the price of an Empire. Never was it more certainly true that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

CHAPTER XI

POSTSCRIPT

CLOSURE OF AUSTRALIAN HOSPITALS--THE FLY CAMPAIGN--VENEREAL DISEASES--Y.M.C.A. AND RED CROSS--MULTIPLICITY OF FUNDS--PROPHYLAXIS--CONDITION OF RECRUITS ON ARRIVAL--HOSPITAL ORGANISATION--THE HELP GIVEN BY ANGLO-EGYPTIANS.