Part 5 (1/2)

”Mornin', old dear,” said that gentleman; ”beast of a day, ain't it? Very good of you to trundle out in it, but I had a letter I wanted you to see, and I hadn't the energy to come round to your place. Bunter and I've been makin' a night of it.”

”What's the letter?” asked Parker.

”Never talk business with your mouth full,” said Lord Peter, reprovingly; ”have some Oxford marmalade--and then I'll show you my Dante; they brought it round last night. What ought I to read this morning, Bunter?”

”Lord Erith's collection is going to be sold, my lord. There is a column about it in the Morning Post. I think your lords.h.i.+p should look at this review of Sir Julian Freke's new book on 'The Physiological Bases of the Conscience' in the Times Literary Supplement. Then there is a very singular little burglary in the Chronicle, my lord, and an attack on t.i.tled families in the Herald--rather ill-written, if I may say so, but not without unconscious humour which your lords.h.i.+p will appreciate.”

”All right, give me that and the burglary,” said his lords.h.i.+p.

”I have looked over the other papers,” pursued Mr. Bunter, indicating a formidable pile, ”and marked your lords.h.i.+p's after-breakfast reading.”

”Oh, pray don't allude to it,” said Lord Peter, ”you take my appet.i.te away.”

There was silence, but for the crunching of toast and the crackling of paper.

”I see they adjourned the inquest,” said Parker presently.

”Nothing else to do,” said Lord Peter, ”but Lady Levy arrived last night, and will have to go and fail to identify the body this morning for Sugg's benefit.”

”Time, too,” said Mr. Parker shortly.

Silence fell again.”I don't think much of your burglary, Bunter,” said Lord Peter. ”Competent, of course, but no imagination. I want imagination in a criminal. Where's the Morning Post?”

After a further silence, Lord Peter said: ”You might send for the catalogue, Bunter, that Apollonios Rhodios* might be worth looking at. No, I'm d.a.m.ned if I'm going to stodge through that review, but you can stick the book on the library list if you like. His book on Crime was entertainin' enough as far as it went, but the fellow's got a bee in his bonnet. Thinks G.o.d's a secretion of the liver--all right once in a way, but there's no need to keep on about it. There's nothing you can't prove if your outlook is only sufficiently limited. Look at Sugg.”

”I beg your pardon,” said Parker, ”I wasn't attending. Argentines are steadying a little, I see.”

”Milligan,” said Lord Peter.

”Oil's in a bad way. Levy's made a difference there. That funny little boom in Peruvians that came on just before he disappeared has died away again. I wonder if he was concerned in it. D'you know at all?”

”I'll find out,” said Lord Peter, ”what was it?”

”Oh, an absolutely dud enterprise that hadn't been heard of for years. It suddenly took a little lease of life last week. I happened to notice it because my mother got let in for a couple of hundred shares a long time ago. It never paid a dividend.

Now it's petered out again.”

Wimsey pushed his plate aside and lit a pipe.

”Having finished, I don't mind doing some work,” he said. ”How did you get on yesterday?”

”I didn't,” replied Parker. ”I sleuthed up and down those flats in my own bodily shape and two different disguises. I was a gas-meter man and a collector for a Home for Lost Doggies, and I didn't get a thing to go on, except a servant in the top flat at the Battersea Bridge Road end of the row who said she thought she'd heard a b.u.mp on the roof one night. Asked which night, she couldn't rightly say.

Asked if it was Monday night, she thought it very likely. Asked if it mightn't havebeen in that high wind on Sat.u.r.day night that blew my chimney-pot off, she couldn't say but what it might have been. Asked if she was sure it was on the roof and not inside the flat, said to be sure they did find a picture tumbled down next morning. Very suggestible girl. I saw your friends, Mr. and Mrs. Appledore, who received me coldly, but could make no definite complaint about Thipps except that his mother dropped her h's, and that he once called on them uninvited, armed with a pamphlet about anti-vivisection. The Indian Colonel on the first floor was loud, but unexpectedly friendly. He gave me Indian curry for supper and some very good whisky, but he's a sort of hermit, and all he could tell me was that he couldn't stand Mrs. Appledore.”

”Did you get nothing at the house?”

”Only Levy's private diary. I brought it away with me. Here it is. It doesn't tell one much, though. It's full of entries like: 'Tom and Annie to dinner'; and 'My dear wife's birthday; gave her an old opal ring'; 'Mr. Arbuthnot dropped in to tea; he wants to marry Rachel, but I should like someone steadier for my treasure.' Still, I thought it would show who came to the house and so on. He evidently wrote it up at night. There's no entry for Monday.”

”I expect it'll be useful,” said Lord Peter, turning over the pages. ”Poor old buffer. I say, I m not so certain now he was done away with.”

He detailed to Mr. Parker his day's work.

”Arbuthnot?” said Parker, ”is that the Arbuthnot of the diary?”

”I suppose so. I hunted him up because I knew he was fond of fooling round the Stock Exchange. As for Milligan, he looks all right, but I believe he's pretty ruthless in business and you never can tell. Then there's the red-haired secretary--lightnin' calculator man with a face like a fish, keeps on sayin'

nuthin'--got the Tar-baby in his family tree, I should think. Milligan's got a jolly good motive for, at any rate, suspendin' Levy for a few days. Then there's the new man.”

”What new man?”

”Ah, that's the letter I mentioned to you. Where did I put it? here we are. Good parchment paper, printed address of solicitor's office in Salisbury, and postmarkto correspond. Very precisely written with a fine nib by an elderly business man of old-fas.h.i.+oned habits.”

Parker took the letter and read: Salisbury.

Solicitors MILFORD HILL, SALISBURY 17 November, 192--.

Sir: With reference to your advertis.e.m.e.nt to-day in the personal column of The Times, I am disposed to believe that the eyegla.s.ses and chain in question may be those I lost on the L. B. & S. C. Electric Railway while visiting London last Monday. I left Victoria by the 5:45 train, and did not notice my loss till I arrived at Balham. This indication and the optician's specification of the gla.s.ses, which I enclose, should suffice at once as an identification and a guarantee of my bona fides. If the gla.s.ses should prove to be mine, I should be greatly obliged to you if you would kindly forward them to me by registered post, as the chain was a present from my daughter, and is one of my dearest possessions.

Thanking you in advance for this kindness, and regretting the trouble to which I shall be putting you, I am Yours very truly, THOS. CRIMPLESHAM.

Lord Peter Wimsey, 110, Piccadilly, W. (Encl.) ”Dear me,” said Parker, ”this is what you might call unexpected.”

”Either it is some extraordinary misunderstanding,” said Lord Peter, ”or Mr.

Crimplesham is a very bold and cunning villain. Or possibly, of course, they are the wrong gla.s.ses. We may as well get a ruling on that point at once. I supposethe gla.s.ses are at the Yard. I wish you'd just ring 'em up and ask 'em to send round an optician's description of them at once--and you might ask at the same time whether it's a very common prescription.”

”Right you are,” said Parker, and took the receiver off its hook.

”And now,” said his friend, when the message was delivered, ”just come into the library for a minute.”

On the library table, Lord Peter had spread out a series of bromide prints, some dry, some damp, and some but half-washed.

”These little ones are the originals of the photos we've been taking,” said Lord Peter, ”and these big ones are enlargements all made to precisely the same scale. This one here is the footmark on the linoleum; we'll put that by itself at present. Now these finger-prints can be divided into five lots. I've numbered 'em on the prints--see?--and made a list: ”A. The finger-prints of Levy himself, off his little bedside book and his hairbrush--this and this--you can't mistake the little scar on the thumb.

”B. The smudges made by the gloved fingers of the man who slept in Levy's room on Monday night. They show clearly on the water-bottle and on the boots--superimposed on Levy's. They are very distinct on the boots--surprisingly so for gloved hands, and I deduce that the gloves were rubber ones and had recently been in water.

”Here's another interestin' point. Levy walked in the rain on Monday night, as we know, and these dark marks are mud-splashes. You see they lie over Levy's finger-prints in every case. Now see: on this left boot we find the stranger's thumb-mark over the mud on the leather above the heel. That's a funny place to find a thumb-mark on a boot, isn't it? That is, if Levy took off his own boots. But it's the place where you'd expect to see it if somebody forcibly removed his boots for him. Again, most of the stranger's finger-marks come over the mud-marks, but here is one splash of mud which comes on top of them again. Which makes me infer that the stranger came back to Park Lane, wearing Levy's boots, in a cab, carriage or car, but that at some point or other he walked a little way--just enough to tread in a puddle and get a splash on the boots. What do you say?””Very pretty,” said Parker. ”A bit intricate, though, and the marks are not all that I could wish a finger-print to be.”

”Well, I won't lay too much stress on it. But it fits in with our previous ideas. Now let's turn to: ”C. The prints obligingly left by my own particular villain on the further edge of Thipps's bath, where you spotted them, and I ought to be scourged for not having spotted them. The left hand, you notice, the base of the palm and the fingers, but not the tips, looking as though he had steadied himself on the edge of the bath while leaning down to adjust something at the bottom, the pince-nez perhaps.

Gloved, you see, but showing no ridge or seam of any kind--I say rubber, you say rubber. That's that. Now see here: ”D and E come off a visiting-card of mine. There's this thing at the corner, marked F, but that you can disregard; in the original doc.u.ment it's a sticky mark left by the thumb of the youth who took it from me, after first removing a piece of chewing-gum from his teeth with his finger to tell me that Mr. Milligan might or might not be disengaged. D and E are the thumb-marks of Mr. Milligan and his red-haired secretary. I'm not clear which is which, but I saw the youth with the chewing-gum hand the card to the secretary, and when I got into the inner shrine I saw John P. Milligan standing with it in his hand, so it's one or the other, and for the moment it's immaterial to our purpose which is which. I boned the card from the table when I left.

”Well, now, Parker, here's what's been keeping Bunter and me up till the small hours. I've measured and measured every way backwards and forwards till my head's spinnin', and I've stared till I'm nearly blind, but I'm hanged if I can make my mind up. Question 1. Is C identical with B? Question 2. Is D or E identical with B? There's nothing to go on but the size and shape, of course, and the marks are so faint--what do you think?”

Parker shook his head doubtfully.

”I think E might almost be put out of the question,” he said, ”it seems such an excessively long and narrow thumb. But I think there is a decided resemblance between the span of B on the water-bottle and C on the bath. And I don't see any reason why D shouldn't be the same as B, only there's so little to judge from.””Your untutored judgment and my measurements have brought us both to the same conclusion--if you can call it a conclusion,” said Lord Peter, bitterly.

”Another thing,” said Parker. ”Why on earth should we try to connect B with C?