Volume Ii Part 1 (1/2)

Human, All-Too-Human.

Part II.

by Friedrich Nietzsche.

INTRODUCTION.

The publication of _Human, all-too-Human_ extends over the period 1878-1880. Of the two divisions which const.i.tute the Second Part, ”Miscellaneous Maxims and Opinions” appeared in 1879, and ”The Wanderer and his Shadow” in 1880, Nietzsche being then in his thirty-sixth year.

The Preface was added in 1886. The whole book forms Nietzsche's first lengthy contribution to literature. His previous works comprise only the philological treatises, _The Birth of Tragedy_, and the essays on Strauss, Schopenhauer, and Wagner in _Thoughts out of Season_.

With the volumes of _Human, all-too-Human_ Nietzsche appears for the first time in his true colours as philosopher. His purely scholarly publications, his essays in literary and musical criticism-especially the essay on Richard Wagner at Bayreuth-had, of course, foreshadowed his work as a thinker.

These efforts, however, had been mere fragments, from which hardly any one could observe that a new philosophical star had arisen on the horizon. But by 1878 the period of transition had definitely set in. Outwardly, the new departure is marked by Nietzsche's resignation in that year of his professors.h.i.+p at Bale-a resignation due partly to ill-health, and partly to his conviction that his was a voice that should speak not merely to students of philology, but to all mankind.

Nietzsche himself characterises _Human, all-too-Human_ as ”the monument of a crisis.” He might as fitly have called it the first-fruits of a new harvest. Now, for the first time, he practises the form which he was to make so peculiarly his own. We are told-and we may well believe-that the book came as a surprise even to his most intimate friends. Wagner had already seen how matters stood at the publication of the first part, and the gulf between the two probably widened on the appearance of the Second Part.

Several aphorisms are here, varying in length as in subject, and ranging over the whole human province-the emotions and aspirations, the religions and cultures and philosophies, the arts and literatures and politics of mankind. Equally varied is the range of style, the incisive epigram and the pa.s.sage of pure poetry jostling each other on the same page. In this curious power of alternating between cynicism and lyricism, Nietzsche appears as the prose counterpart of Heine.

One or two of the aphorisms are of peculiar interest to English readers.

The essay (as it may almost be called) on Sterne (p. 60, No. 113) does ample justice, if not more than justice, to that wayward genius. The allusion to Milton (p. 77, No. 150) will come as somewhat of a shock to English readers, especially to those who hold that in Milton Art triumphed over Puritanism. It should be remembered, however, that Nietzsche's view coincides with Goethe's. The dictum that Shakespeare's gold is to be valued for its quant.i.ty rather than its quality (p. 81, No. 162) also betrays a certain exclusiveness-a legacy from that eighteenth-century France which appealed so strongly to Nietzsche on its intellectual side.

To Nietzsche, as to Voltaire, Shakespeare is after all ”the great barbarian.”

The t.i.tle of the book may be explained from a phrase in _Thus Spake Zarathustra_: ”Verily, even the greatest I found-all-too-human.” The keynote of these volumes is indeed disillusion and destruction. Nor is this to be wondered at, for all men must sweep away the rubbish before they can build. Hence we find here little of the constructive philosophy of Nietzsche-so far as he had a constructive philosophy. The Superman appears but faintly, the doctrine of Eternal Recurrence not at all. For this very reason, _Human, all-too-Human_ is perhaps the best starting-point for the study of Nietzsche. The difficulties in style and thought of the later work-difficulties that at times become well-nigh insuperable in _Thus Spake Zarathustra_-are here practically absent. The book may, in fact, almost be described as ”popular,” bearing the same relation to Nietzsche's later productions as Wagner's _Tannhauser_ and _Lohengrin_ bear to the _Ring_.

The translator's thanks are due to Mr. Thomas Common for his careful revision of the ma.n.u.script and many valuable suggestions.

P. V. C.

PREFACE.

1.

One should only speak where one cannot remain silent, and only speak of what one has _conquered_-the rest is all chatter, ”literature,” bad breeding. My writings speak only of my conquests, ”I” am in them, with all that is hostile to me, _ego ipsissimus_, or, if a more haughty expression be permitted, _ego ipsissimum_. It may be guessed that I have many below me.... But first I always needed time, convalescence, distance, separation, before I felt the stirrings of a desire to flay, despoil, lay bare, ”represent” (or whatever one likes to call it) for the additional knowledge of the world, something that I had lived through and outlived, something done or suffered. Hence all my writings,-with one exception, important, it is true,-must be _ante-dated_-they always tell of a ”behind-me.” Some even, like the first three _Thoughts out of Season_, must be thrown back before the period of creation and experience of a previously published book (_The Birth of Tragedy_ in the case cited, as any one with subtle powers of observation and comparison could not fail to perceive). That wrathful outburst against the Germanism, smugness, and raggedness of speech of old David Strauss, the contents of the first _Thought out of Season_, gave a vent to feelings that had inspired me long before, as a student, in the midst of German culture and cultured Philistinism (I claim the paternity of the now much used and misused phrase ”cultured Philistinism”). What I said against the ”historical disease” I said as one who had slowly and laboriously recovered from that disease, and who was not at all disposed to renounce ”history” in the future because he had suffered from her in the past. When in the third _Thought out of Season_ I gave expression to my reverence for my first and only teacher, the _great_ Arthur Schopenhauer-I should now give it a far more personal and emphatic voice-I was for my part already in the throes of moral scepticism and dissolution, that is, as much concerned with the criticism as with the study of all pessimism down to the present day. I already did not believe in ”a blessed thing,” as the people say, not even in Schopenhauer. It was at this very period that an unpublished essay of mine, ”On Truth and Falsehood in an Extra-Moral Sense,” came into being.

Even my ceremonial oration in honour of Richard Wagner, on the occasion of his triumphal celebration at Bayreuth in 1876-Bayreuth signifies the greatest triumph that an artist has ever won-a work that bears the strongest stamp of ”individuality,” was in the background an act of homage and grat.i.tude to a bit of the past in me, to the fairest but most perilous calm of my sea-voyage ... and as a matter of fact a severance and a farewell. (Was Richard Wagner mistaken on this point? I do not think so.

So long as we still love, we do not paint such pictures, we do not yet ”examine,” we do not place ourselves so far away as is essential for one who ”examines.” ”Examining needs at least a secret antagonism, that of an opposite point of view,” it is said on page 46 of the above-named work itself, with an insidious, melancholy application that was perhaps understood by few.) The composure that gave me the _power_ to speak after many intervening years of solitude and abstinence, first came with the book, _Human, All-too Human_, to which this second preface and apologia(1) is dedicated. As a book for ”free spirits” it shows some trace of that almost cheerful and inquisitive coldness of the psychologist, who has _behind_ him many painful things that he keeps _under_ him, and moreover establishes them for himself and fixes them firmly as with a needle-point.