Part 35 (2/2)
was free of charge in the first instance, and immediately after the division was found with 122, this amount _at least_ may be taken as what it had received. On the other hand 124 minus 1, or 123, may be taken as the half of the transferable charge retained by app. i. Now these do not differ much from each other, or from 124.5, the half of the full amount of transferable charge; and when the gradual loss of charge evident in the difference between 254 and 250 of app. i. is also taken into account, there is every reason to admit the result as showing an equal division of charge, _unattended by any disappearance of power_ except that due to dissipation.
1210. I will give another result, in which app. ii. was first charged, and where the residual action of that apparatus was greater than in the former case.
App. i. App. ii.
b.a.l.l.s 150
. . . . 152 . . . . 148 divided and instantly taken 70 . . . .
. . . . 78 . . . . 5 immediately after discharge.
0 . . . . immediately after discharge.
1211. The transferable charge being 148 - 5, its half is 71.5, which is not far removed from 70, the half charge of i.; or from 73, the half charge of ii.: these half charges again making up the sum of 143, or just the amount of the whole transferable charge. Considering the errors of experiment, therefore, these results may again be received as showing that the apparatus were equal in inductive capacity, or in their powers of receiving charges.
1212. The experiments were repeated with charges of negative electricity with the same general results.
1213. That I might be sure of the sensibility and action of the apparatus, I made such a change in one as ought upon principle to increase its inductive force, i.e. I put a metallic lining into the lower hemisphere of app. i., so as to diminish the thickness of the intervening air in that part, from 0.62 to 0.435 of an inch: this lining was carefully shaped and rounded so that it should not present a sudden projection within at its edge, but a gradual transition from the reduced interval in the lower part of the sphere to the larger one in the upper.
1214. This change immediately caused app. i. to produce effects indicating that it had a greater aptness or capacity for induction than app. ii. Thus, when a transferable charge in app. ii. of 469 was divided with app. i., the former retained a charge of 225, whilst the latter showed one of 227, i.e. the former had lost 244 in communicating 227 to the latter: on the other hand, when app. i. had a transferable charge in it of 381 divided by contact with app. ii., it lost 181 only, whilst it gave to app. ii. as many as 194:--the sum of the divided forces being in the first instance _less_, and in the second instance _greater_ than the original undivided charge. These results are the more striking, as only one-half of the interior of app. i. was modified, and they show that the instruments are capable of bringing out differences in inductive force from amongst the errors of experiment, when these differences are much less than that produced by the alteration made in the present instance.
-- iv. _Induction in curved lines._
1215. Amongst those results deduced from the molecular view of induction (1166.), which, being of a peculiar nature, are the best tests of the truth or error of the theory, the expected action in curved lines is, I think, the most important at present; for, if shown to take place in an unexceptionable manner, I do not see how the old theory of action at a distance and in straight lines can stand, or how the conclusion that ordinary induction is an action of contiguous particles can be resisted.
1216. There are many forms of old experiments which might be quoted as favourable to, and consistent with the view I have adopted. Such are most cases of electro-chemical decomposition, electrical brushes, auras, sparks, &c.; but as these might be considered equivocal evidence, inasmuch as they include a current and discharge, (though they have long been to me indications of prior molecular action (1230.)) I endeavoured to devise such experiments for first proofs as should not include transfer, but relate altogether to the pure simple inductive action of statical electricity.
1217. It was also of importance to make these experiments in the simplest possible manner, using not more than one insulating medium or dielectric at a time, lest differences of slow conduction should produce effects which might erroneously be supposed to result from induction in curved lines. It will be unnecessary to describe the steps of the investigation minutely; I will at once proceed to the simplest mode of proving the facts, first in air and then in other insulating media.
1218. A cylinder of solid sh.e.l.l-lac, 0.9 of an inch in diameter and seven inches in length, was fixed upright in a wooden foot (fig. 106.): it was made concave or cupped at its upper extremity so that a bra.s.s ball or other small arrangement could stand upon it. The upper half of the stem having been excited _negatively_ by friction with warm flannel, a bra.s.s ball, B, 1 inch in diameter, was placed on the top, and then the whole arrangement examined by the carrier ball and Coulomb's electrometer (1180. &c.). For this purpose the b.a.l.l.s of the electrometer were charged _positively_ to about 360, and then the carrier being applied to various parts of the ball B, the two were uninsulated whilst in contact or in position, then insulated[A], separated, and the charge of the carrier examined as to its nature and force. Its electricity was always positive, and its force at the different positions _a, b, c, d,_ &c. (figs. 106. and 107.) observed in succession, was as follows:
at _a_ above 1000 _b_ it was 149 _c_ 270 _d_ 512 _b_ 130
[A] It can hardly be necessary for me to say here, that whatever general state the carrier ball acquired in any place where it was uninsulated and then insulated, it retained on removal from that place, notwithstanding that it might pa.s.s through other places that would have given to it, if uninsulated, a different condition.
1219. To comprehend the full force of these results, it must first be understood, that all the charges of the ball B and the carrier are charges by induction, from the action of the excited surface of the sh.e.l.l-lac cylinder; for whatever electricity the ball B received by _communication_ from the sh.e.l.l-lac, either in the first instance or afterwards, was removed by the uninsulating contacts, only that due to induction remaining; and this is shown by the charges taken from the ball in this its uninsulated state being always positive, or of the contrary character to the electricity of the sh.e.l.l-lac. In the next place, the charges at _a_, _c_, and _d_ were of such a nature as might be expected from an inductive action in straight lines, but that obtained at _b_ is _not so_: it is clearly a charge by induction, but _induction_ in _a curved line_; for the carrier ball whilst applied to _b_, and after its removal to a distance of six inches or more from B, could not, in consequence of the size of B, be connected by a straight line with any part of the excited and inducing sh.e.l.l-lac.
1220. To suppose that the upper part of the _uninsulated_ ball B, should in some way be retained in an electrified state by that portion of the surface of the ball which is in sight of the sh.e.l.l-lac, would be in opposition to what we know already of the subject. Electricity is retained upon the surface of conductors only by induction (1178.); and though some persons may not be prepared as yet to admit this with respect to insulated conductors, all will as regards uninsulated conductors like the ball B; and to decide the matter we have only to place the carrier ball at _e_ (fig.
107.), so that it shall not come in contact with B, uninsulate it by a metallic rod descending perpendicularly, insulate it, remove it, and examine its state; it will be found charged with the same kind of electricity as, and even to a _higher degree_ (1224.) than, if it had been in contact with the summit of B.
1221. To suppose, again, that induction acts in some way _through or across_ the metal of the ball, is negatived by the simplest considerations; but a fact in proof will be better. If instead of the ball B a small disc of metal be used, the carrier may be charged at, or above the middle of its upper surface: but if the plate be enlarged to about 1-1/2 or 2 inches in diameter, C (fig. 108.), then no charge will be given to the carrier at _f_, though when applied nearer to the edge at _g_, or even _above the middle_ at _h_, a charge will be obtained; and this is true though the plate may be a mere thin film of gold-leaf. Hence it is clear that the induction is not _through_ the metal, but through the surrounding air or _dielectric_, and that in curved lines.
1222. I had another arrangement, in which a wire pa.s.sing downwards through the middle of the sh.e.l.l-lac cylinder to the earth, was connected with the ball B (fig. 109.) so as to keep it in a constantly uninsulated state. This was a very convenient form of apparatus, and the results with it were the same as those just described.
1223. In another case the ball B was supported by a sh.e.l.l-lac stem, independently of the excited cylinder of sh.e.l.l-lac, and at half an inch distance from it; but the effects were the same. Then the bra.s.s ball of a charged Leyden jar was used in place of the excited sh.e.l.l-lac to produce induction; but this caused no alteration of the phenomena. Both positive and negative inducing charges were tried with the same general results.
Finally, the arrangement was inverted in the air for the purpose of removing every possible objection to the conclusions, but they came out exactly the same.
1224. Some results obtained with a bra.s.s hemisphere instead of the ball B were exceedingly interesting, It was 1.36 of an inch in diameter, (fig.
110.), and being placed on the top of the excited sh.e.l.l-lac cylinder, the carrier ball was applied, as in the former experiments (1218.), at the respective positions delineated in the figure. At _i_ the force was 112, at _k_ 108, at _l_ 65, at _m_ 35; the inductive force gradually diminis.h.i.+ng, as might have been expected, to this point. But on raising the carrier to the position _n_, the charge increased to 87; and on raising it still higher to _o_, the charge still further increased to 105: at a higher point still, _p_, the charge taken was smaller in amount, being 98, and continued to diminish for more elevated positions. Here the induction fairly turned a corner. Nothing, in fact, can better show both the curved lines or courses of the inductive action, disturbed as they are from their rectilineal form by the shape, position, and condition of the metallic hemisphere; and also a _lateral tension,_ so to speak, of these lines on one another:--all depending, as I conceive, on induction being an action of the contiguous particles of the dielectric, which being thrown into a state of polarity and tension, are in mutual relation by their forces in all directions.
1225. As another proof that the whole of these actions were inductive I may state a result which was exactly what might be expected, namely, that if uninsulated conducting matter was brought round and near to the excited sh.e.l.l-lac stem, then the inductive force was directed towards it, and could not be found on the top of the hemisphere. Removing this matter the lines of force resumed their former direction. The experiment affords proofs of the lateral tension of these lines, and supplies a warning to remove such matter in repeating the above investigation.
<script>