Volume VIII Part 1 (1/2)
Parochial and Plain Sermons.
Vol. VIII.
by John Henry Newman.
SERMON I.
Reverence in Wors.h.i.+p.
”_Samuel ministered before the Lord, being a child, girded with a linen ephod._”--1 Samuel ii. 18.
Samuel, viewed in his place in sacred history, that is, in the course of events which connect Moses with Christ, appears as a great ruler and teacher of his people; this is his prominent character. He was the first of the prophets; yet, when we read the sacred narrative itself, in which his life is set before us, I suppose those pa.s.sages are the more striking and impressive which represent him, in the office which belonged to him by birth, as a Levite, or minister of G.o.d. He was taken into G.o.d's special service from the first; he lived in His Temple; nay, while yet a child, he was honoured with the apparel of a sacred function, as the text tells us, ”he ministered before the Lord, being a child, girded with a linen ephod.”
His mother had ”given him unto the Lord all the days of his life[1],”
by a solemn vow before his birth; and in him, if in any one, were fulfilled the words of the Psalmist, ”Blessed are they that dwell in Thy house, they will be always praising Thee[2].”
Such a constant abode in G.o.d's house would make common minds only familiar with holy things, and irreverent; but where G.o.d's grace is present in the heart, the effect is the reverse; which we might be sure would happen in the case of Samuel. ”The Lord was with him,” we are told; and therefore the more the outward signs of that Lord met his eye, the more reverent he became, not the more presuming. The more he acquainted himself with G.o.d, the greater would be his awe and holy fear.
Thus the first notice we have of his ministering before the Lord, reminds us of the decency and gravity necessary at all times, and in all persons, in approaching Him. ”He ministered before the Lord, being a child, girded with a linen ephod.” His mother had made him yearly a little coat for his common use, but in Divine Service he wore, not this, but a garment which would both express, and impress upon him, reverence.
And, in like manner, in his old age, when Saul sent to seek David at Naioth, where Samuel was, his messengers found Samuel and the prophets under him all in decent order. ”They saw the company of prophets prophesying, and Samuel over them.” And this was so impressive a sight, that it became an instrument of G.o.d's supernatural power towards them, and they prophesied also.
On the other hand, if we would have an example of the want of this reverence, we have it in Saul himself, the reprobate king, who, when he was on his way to Naioth, and was visited by G.o.d's Holy Spirit, did not thereupon receive the garment of salvation, nor was clothed in righteousness, but behaved himself in an unseemly wild way, as one whose dest.i.tution and shame were but detected by the visitation. He stript off his clothes and prophesied before Samuel, and lay down in that state all that day and all that night.
This difference we see even at this day:--of persons professing religion, some are like Samuel, some like Saul; some (as it were) cast off their garments and prophesy in disorder and extravagance; others minister before the Lord, ”girded with a linen ephod,” with ”their loins girt and their lamps burning,” like men awfully expecting the coming of their great and glorious Judge. By the latter, I mean the true children of the Holy Catholic Church, by the former, I mean heretics and schismatic.
There have ever been from the first these two kinds of Christians--those who belonged to the Church, and those who did not.
There never was a time since the Apostles' day, when the Church was not; and there never was a time but men were to be found who preferred some other way of wors.h.i.+p to the Church's way. These two kinds of professed Christians ever have been--Church Christians, and Christians not of the Church; and it is remarkable, I say, that while, on the one hand, reverence for sacred things has been a characteristic of Church Christians on the whole, so, want of reverence has been the characteristic on the whole of Christians not of the Church. The one have prophesied after the figure of Samuel, the other after the figure of Saul.
Of course there are many exceptions to this remark in the case of individuals. Of course I am not speaking of inconsistent persons and exceptional cases, in the Church, or out of it; but of those who act up to what they profess. I mean that zealous, earnest, and faithful members of the Church have generally been reverent; and zealous, earnest, and faithful members of other religious bodies have generally been irreverent. Again, after all, there will be real exceptions in the case of individuals which we cannot account for; but I mean that, on, the _whole_, it will be found that reverence is one of the marks or notes of the Church; true though it may be that some particular individuals, who have kept apart from it, have not been without a reverential spirit notwithstanding.
Indeed so natural is the connexion between a reverential spirit in wors.h.i.+pping G.o.d, and faith in G.o.d, that the wonder only is, how any one can for a moment imagine he has faith in G.o.d, and yet allow himself to be irreverent towards Him. To believe in G.o.d, is to believe the being and presence of One who is All-holy, and All-powerful, and All-gracious; how can a man really believe thus of Him, and yet make free with Him? it is almost a contradiction in terms. Hence even heathen religions have ever considered faith and reverence identical.
To believe, and not to revere, to wors.h.i.+p familiarly, and at one's ease, is an anomaly and a prodigy unknown even to false religions, to say nothing of the true one. Not only the Jewish and Christian religions, which are directly from G.o.d, inculcate the spirit of ”reverence and G.o.dly fear,” but those other religions which have existed, or exist, whether in the East or the South, inculcate the same. Wors.h.i.+p, forms of wors.h.i.+p--such as bowing the knee, taking off the shoes, keeping silence, a prescribed dress, and the like--are considered as necessary for a due approach to G.o.d. The whole world, differing about so many things differing in creed and rule of life, yet agree in this--that G.o.d being our Creator, a certain self-abas.e.m.e.nt of the whole man is the duty of the creature; that He is in heaven, we upon earth; that He is All-glorious, and we worms of the earth and insects of a day.
But those who have separated from the Church of Christ have in this respect fallen into greater than pagan error. They may be said to form an exception to the concordant voice of a whole world, always and every where; they break in upon the unanimous suffrage of mankind, and determine, at least by their conduct, that reverence and awe are not primary religious duties. They have considered that in some way or other, either by G.o.d's favour or by their own illumination, they are brought so near to G.o.d that they have no need to fear at all, or to put any restraint upon their words or thoughts when addressing Him. They have considered awe to be superst.i.tion, and reverence to be slavery.
They have learnt to be familiar and free with sacred things, as it were, on principle. I think this is really borne out by facts, and will approve itself to inquirers as true in substance, however one man will differ from another in the words in which he would express the fact itself.
Samuel was a little child who had never fallen away from G.o.d, but by His grace had ever served Him. Let us take a very different instance, the instance of a penitent sinner as set before us in the parable of the Publican and Pharisee. I need hardly say which of the two was the most pleasing to G.o.d--the Publican; whereas the Pharisee was not accepted by Him. Now what did the Pharisee do? He did not even go so far as to behave in an unseemly, extravagant way: he was grave and solemn, and yet what he did was enough to displease G.o.d, because he took too much upon himself, and made too much of himself. Though grave and solemn, he was not reverent; he spoke in a haughty, proud way, and made a long sentence, thanking G.o.d that he was not as other men are, and despising the Publican. Such was the behaviour of the Pharisee; but the Publican behaved very differently. Observe how he came to wors.h.i.+p G.o.d; ”he stood afar off; he lift not up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, G.o.d be merciful to me a sinner[3].” You see his words were few, and almost broken, and his whole conduct humble and reverent; he felt that G.o.d was in heaven, he upon earth, G.o.d All-holy and Almighty, and he a poor sinner.
Now all of us are sinners, all of us have need to come to G.o.d as the Publican did; every one, if he does but search his heart, and watch his conduct, and try to do his duty, will find himself to be full of sins which provoke G.o.d's wrath. I do not mean to say that all men are equally sinners; some are wilful sinners, and of them there is no hope, till they repent; others sin, but they try to avoid sinning, pray to G.o.d to make them better, and come to Church to be made better; but all men are quite sinners enough to make it their duty to behave as the Publican. Every one ought to come into Church as the Publican did, to say in his heart, ”Lord, I am not worthy to enter this sacred place; my only plea for coming is the merits of Jesus Christ my Saviour.” When, then, a man enters Church, as many do, carelessly and familiarly, thinking of himself, not of G.o.d, sits down coldly and at his ease, either does not say a prayer at all, or merely hides his face for form's sake, sitting all the while, not standing or kneeling; then looks about to see who is in the Church, and who is not, and makes himself easy and comfortable in his seat, and uses the kneeler for no other purpose than to put his feet upon; in short, comes to Church as a place, not of meeting G.o.d and His holy Angels, but of seeing what is to be seen with the bodily eyes, and hearing what is to be heard with the bodily ears, and then goes and gives his judgment about the sermon freely, and says, ”I do not like this or that,” or ”This is a good argument, but that is a bad one,” or ”I do not like this person so much as that,” and so on; I mean when a man acts in all respects as if he was at home, and not in G.o.d's House,--all I can say is, that he ventures to do in G.o.d's presence what neither Cherubim nor Seraphim venture to do, for they veil their faces, and, as if not daring to address G.o.d, praise Him to each other, in few words, and those continually repeated, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord G.o.d of Sabaoth.
What I have said has been enough to suggest what it is to serve G.o.d acceptably, viz. ”with reverence and G.o.dly fear,” as St. Paul says. We must not aim at forms for their own sake, but we must keep in mind where we are, and then forms will come into our service naturally. We must in all respects act as if we saw G.o.d; that is, if we believe that G.o.d is here, we shall keep silence; we shall not laugh, or talk, or whisper during the Service, as many young persons do; we shall not gaze about us. We shall follow the example set us by the Church itself. I mean, as the words in which we pray in Church are not our own, neither will our looks, or our postures, or our thoughts, be our own. We shall, in the prophet's words, not ”do our own ways” there, nor ”find our own pleasure,” nor ”speak our own words;” in imitation of all Saints before us, including the Holy Apostles, who never spoke their own words in solemn wors.h.i.+p, but either those which Christ taught them, or which the Holy Ghost taught them, or which the Old Testament taught them. This is the reason why we always pray from a book in Church; the Apostles said to Christ, ”Lord, teach us to pray,” and our Lord graciously gave them the prayer called the Lord's Prayer. For the same reason we too use the Lord's Prayer, and we use the Psalms of David and of other holy men, and hymns which are given us in Scripture, thinking it better to use the words of inspired Prophets than our own. And for the same reason we use a number of short pet.i.tions, such as ”Lord, have mercy upon us,” ”O Lord, save the Queen,” ”O Lord, open Thou our lips,”
and the like, not using many words, or rounding our sentences, or allowing ourselves to enlarge in prayer.
Thus all we do in Church is done on a principle of _reverence_; it is done with the thought that we are in G.o.d's presence. But irreverent persons, not understanding this, when they come into Church, and find nothing there of a striking kind, when they find every thing is read from a book, and in a calm, quiet way, and still more, when they come a second and a third time, and find every thing just the same, over and over again, they are offended and tired. ”There is nothing,” they say, ”to rouse or interest them.” They think G.o.d's service dull and tiresome, if I may use such words; for they do not come to Church to honour G.o.d, but to please themselves. They want something new. They think the prayers are long, and wish that there was more preaching, and that in a striking oratorical way, with loud voice and florid style.
And when they observe that the wors.h.i.+ppers in Church are serious and subdued in their manner, and will not look, and speak, and move as much at their ease as out of doors, or in their own houses, then (if they are very profane) they ridicule them, as weak and superst.i.tious. Now is it not plain that those who are thus tired, and wearied, and made impatient by our sacred services below, would most certainly get tired and wearied with heaven above? because there the Cherubim and Seraphim ”rest not day and night,” saying, ”Holy, holy, holy, Lord G.o.d Almighty.” Such as this, too, will be the way of the Saints in glory, for we are told that there will be a great voice of much people saying, Alleluia; and again they said Alleluia, and the four-and-twenty elders said Alleluia, and a voice of many waters and of mighty thunderings said Alleluia. Such, too, was our Lord's way, when in His agony He three times repeated the same words, ”Thy will, not Mine, be done.” It is the delight of all holy beings, who stand around the Throne, to use one and the same form of wors.h.i.+p; they are not tired, it is ever new pleasure to them to say the words anew. They are never tired; but surely all those persons would be soon tired of hearing them, instead of taking part in their glorious chant, who are weaned of Church now, and seek for something more attractive and rousing.