Part 1 (2/2)
I am confident that he considers the thunder as being supernatural, and that he would propitiate it, if he only knew how.
[3] Maspero (Sayce): _The Dawn of Civilization_, p. 103, and Maspero: _Etudes de Mythologie et d'Archiologie Egyptiennes_, vol.
ii, pp. 34, 35.
It is not probable that, at the present time, there exists a race of people which has not formulated an idea of ghost or soul; yet in ancient times, and up to a century or so ago, there existed many peoples who had not conceived any idea of ghosts or doubles.
According to Maspero, Sayce, Champollion, and other Egyptologists, the ancient Egyptians probably had a natural theogony long before they arrived at any idea of a double. In the beginning they treated the double or ghost with scant ceremony; it was only after many years that an element of wors.h.i.+p entered into their treatment of the ghosts of their dead ancestors. They believed, at first, that the double dwelt forever in the tomb along with the dead body; afterward, they evolved the idea that the double of the dead man journeyed to the ”Islands of the Blessed,” where it was judged by Osiris according to its merits.[4]
We have no reason for believing that the ancient Hebrews at the time of the Exodus had any knowledge of, or belief in, the existence of the soul or double, yet, that they did believe in the supernatural can not be questioned.[C] When Cook touched at Tierra del Fuego, he found a people in whom there existed mental habitudes but little above those to be found in the anthropoid apes. They had no knowledge whatever of the soul or double and but a dim concept of the powers of nature; they had not yet advanced far enough in psychical development to evolve any consistent form of natural theogony. They had only a shadowy concept of evil beings, powers of the air that inhabited the dense brakes of the forest, whom it would be dangerous to molest. Father Junipero Serra declares that when he first established the Mission Dolores, the Ahwashtees, Ohlones, Romanos, Altahmos, Tuolomos, and other Californian tribes had no word in their language for G.o.d, ghost, or devil.[5] The Inca Yupangui informed Balboa that there were many tribes in the interior which had no idea of ghost or soul.[6] Another writer says, that the Chirihuanas did not wors.h.i.+p anything either in heaven or on earth, and that they had no belief whatever in a future state.[7] Modern travelers have, however, found distinct evidences of phallic wors.h.i.+p in certain observances and customs of this tribe.[8]
[4] Maspero (Sayce): _The Dawn of Civilization_, p. 183 _et seq._
[C] That the patriarchs had their household G.o.ds, we have every reason for believing; these household G.o.ds were, however, tutelary divinities, such as were kept in the house of every Chaldean, and were not the images of ancestors. Rachel, the wife of Jacob, stole the household G.o.ds of Laban, her father, who is called a Syrian.
Abraham himself was a Chaldean. Gen. 11:31; also Gen. 31:19-20.
[5] Bancroft: _The Native Races of the Pacific States of North America_, vol. i, p. 400.
[6] Balboa: _History of Peru_.
[7] Garcila.s.so: _The Royal Commentaries of the Incas_.
[8] Browlow: _Travels_, p. 136.
Certain autochthons of India, when first discovered, were exceedingly immature in religious beliefs; they had neither G.o.d nor devil; they wandered through the woods subsisting on berries and fruits, and such small animals as their undeveloped and feeble sagacity allowed them to capture and slay. They did not even provide themselves with shelter, but, in pristine nakedness, roamed the forests of the Ghauts, animals but slightly above the anthropoid apes in point of intelligence. ”In Central California we find,” says Bancroft, ”whole tribes subsisting on roots, herbs, and insects; having no boats, no clothing, no laws, no G.o.d.”[9]
[9] Bancroft: _The Native Races of the Pacific States of North America_, vol. i, p. 400.
In the northwestern corner of the American continent there dwells a primitive race, which, for the sake of unification, I will style the Aleutians. When these people were first discovered they were in that state of social economics which they had reached after thousands of years of psychical and social evolution; a primitive people, such as our own ancestors were in the very beginning of civilization. The word civilization is used advisedly; civilization is comparative, and its degrees begin with the inception of man himself.
In their theogony, the Aleutians had arrived at an idea of the double or soul, thus showing that their religion had progressed several steps toward abstraction, that triumph of civilized religiosity; yet there remained enough veneration of natural objects to show that the origin of the religious feeling began, with them, in nature-propitiation. The bladder of the bear, which viscus, in the estimation of the Aleutians, is the seat of life, is at once suspended above the entrance of the _kachim_ or communal dwelling and wors.h.i.+ped by the hunter who has slain the beast from which it was taken. Moreover, when the bear falls beneath the weapons of an Aleutian, the man begs pardon of the beast and prays the latter to forgive him and to do him no harm. ”A hunter who has struck a mortal blow generally remains within his hut for one or several days, according to the importance of the slain animal.”[10] The first herring that is caught is showered with compliments and blessings; pompous t.i.tles are lavished upon it, and it is handled with the greatest respect and reverence; it is the herring-G.o.d![11]
[10] Reclus: _Primitive Folk_, p. 18.
[11] Dall: _Alaska and its Resources_, p. 96.
Sidne, chief G.o.d of the Aleutian theogony, on final a.n.a.lysis, is found to be the Earth, mother of all things. The _angakouts_, or priests, of this people individualize and deify, however, all the phenomena of nature; there are cloud-G.o.ds, sea-G.o.ds, river-G.o.ds, fire-G.o.ds, rain-G.o.ds, storm-G.o.ds, etc., etc., etc. Everywhere, throughout all nature, the Inoit, or Aleutian system of theology, penetrates, stripped, it is true, of much of its original materialism, yet retaining enough to show its undoubted origin in the sensual percepts, recepts, and concepts of its primal founders.
As I have observed above, the religion of these people has gained a certain degree of abstraction, and this abstraction is further shown by the presence of certain phallic rites and ceremonies in their religious observances; but of this, more anon.[D]
[D] In a letter to me, a naval officer of high rank states that, beyond question of doubt, the Aleutian priests keep male concubines whom they use in their religious observances. He, also, gives other evidences of phallic wors.h.i.+p among these people.
In most of the tribes of Equatorial Africa, nature-wors.h.i.+p has been superseded by ghost-wors.h.i.+p, devil-wors.h.i.+p, or witch-wors.h.i.+p, or, rather, by ghost, devil, or witch propitiation; yet, in the sanct.i.ty of the fetich, which is everywhere present, we see a relic of nature-wors.h.i.+p. Moreover, many of these tribes deify natural phenomena, such as the sun, the moon, the stars, thunder, lightning, etc., etc., etc., showing that here, too, in all probability, religious feeling had its origin in nature propitiation.
Abstraction also enters, to a certain extent, into the religious beliefs of most of these negroes, in whom primal materialism has given place to the unbridled superst.i.tion of crude spiritism. The curious habit these people have of sc.r.a.ping a little bone dust from the skull of a dead ancestor and then eating it with their food, thus, as they think, transmitting from the dead to the living the qualities of the former, is close kin to, and, in my opinion, is probably derived from, a wors.h.i.+p of the generative principle. When we take into consideration the fact that circ.u.mcision, _extensio c.l.i.toridis_, and other phallic rites are exceedingly common and prevalent among these negroes, this opinion has strong evidence in its support.[12]
<script>