Part 73 (2/2)

Henceforth the submission of Compiegne was sure. The King summoned the citizens to receive him; on Wednesday the 18th, the keys of the town were brought to him; on the next day he entered.[1681] The Attorneys[1682]

(for by that name the aldermen of the town were called) presented to him Messire Guillaume de Flavy, whom they had elected governor of their town, as being their most experienced and most faithful citizen.

On his being presented they asked the King, according to their privilege, to confirm and ratify his appointment. But the sire de la Tremouille took for himself the governors.h.i.+p of Compiegne and appointed as his lieutenant Messire Guillaume de Flavy, whom, notwithstanding, the inhabitants regarded as their captain.[1683]

[Footnote 1680: _Chronique de la Pucelle_, p. 328. _Journal du siege_, p. 18. Jean Chartier, _Chronique_, vol. i, p. 106. Perceval de Cagny, pp. 163, 164. Morosini, pp. 212, 213. Flammermont, _Senlis pendant la seconde periode de la guerre cent ans_, in _Memoires de la Societe de l'Histoire de Paris_, vol. v, 1878, p. 241.]

[Footnote 1681: Perceval de Cagny, p. 164. Monstrelet, p. 352. De l'Epinois, _Notes extraites des archives communales de Compiegne_, pp.

483, 484. A. Sorel, _Sejours de Jeanne d'Arc a Compiegne, maisons ou elle a loge en 1429 et 1430_, Paris, 1889, in 8vo, 20 pages.]

[Footnote 1682: French _attournes_, cf. La Curne, _attournes_, G.o.defroi, _atornes_, magistrates at Compiegne, elected on St. John the Baptist's Day for three years (W.S.). _Proces_, vol. v, p. 174.]

[Footnote 1683: _Chronique de la Pucelle_, p. 331. Jean Chartier, _Chronique_, vol. i, p. 106. A. Sorel, _La prise de Jeanne d'Arc devant Compiegne_, Paris, 1889, in 8vo, pp. 117, 118. Duc de la Tremolle, _Les La Tremolle pendant cinq siecles_, Nantes, 1890, in 4to, vol. i, pp. 185, 212. P. Champion, _Guillaume de Flavy, capitaine de Compiegne_, Paris, 1906, in 8vo, proofs and ill.u.s.trations, vol.

xiii, p. 137.]

One by one, the King was recovering his good towns. He charged the folk of Beauvais to acknowledge him as their lord. When they saw the flowers-de-luce borne by the heralds, the citizens cried: ”Long live Charles of France!” The clergy chanted a _Te Deum_ and there was great rejoicing. Those who refused fealty to King Charles were put out of the town with permission to take away their possessions.[1684] The Bishop and Vidame of Beauvais, Messire Pierre Cauchon, who was Grand Almoner of France to King Henry, and a negotiator of important ecclesiastical business, grieved to see his city returning to the French;[1685] it was to the city's hurt, but he could not help it. He failed not to realise that part of this disgrace he owed to the Maid of the Armagnacs, who was influential with her party and had the reputation of being all powerful. As he was a good theologian he must have suspected that the devil was leading her and he wished her all possible harm.

[Footnote 1684: _Chronique de la Pucelle_, p. 327. _Journal du siege_, p. 118. Jean Chartier, _Chronique_, vol. i, p. 106. Monstrelet, vol.

iv, pp. 353, 354. Morosini, vol. iii, pp. 214, 215.]

[Footnote 1685: A. Sarrazin, _Pierre Cauchon, juge de Jeanne d'Arc_, Paris, 1901, in 8vo, pp. 49 _et seq._]

At this time Artois, Picardy, all the Burgundian territory in the north, was slipping away from Burgundy. Had King Charles gone there the majority of the dwellers in the strong towers and castles of Picardy would have received him as their sovereign.[1686] But meanwhile his enemies would have recaptured what he had just won in Valois and the ile de France.

[Footnote 1686: Monstrelet, vol. iv, p. 354.]

Having entered Compiegne with the King, Jeanne lodged at the Hotel du Boeuf, the house of the King's proctor. She slept with the proctor's wife, Marie Le Boucher, who was a kinswoman of Jacques Boucher, Treasurer of Orleans.[1687]

[Footnote 1687: A. Sorel, _Sejours de Jeanne d'Arc a Compiegne_, p. 6.]

She longed to march on Paris, which she was sure of taking since her Voices had promised it to her. It is related that at the end of two or three days she grew impatient, and, calling the Duke of Alencon, said to him: ”My fair Duke, command your men and likewise those of the other captains to equip themselves,” then she is said to have cried: ”By my staff! I must to Paris.”[1688] But this could not have happened: the Maid never gave orders to the men-at-arms. The truth of the matter is that the Duke of Alencon, with a goodly company of fighting men, took his leave of the King and that Jeanne was to accompany him. She was ready to mount her horse when on Monday the 22nd of August, a messenger from the Count of Armagnac brought her a letter which she caused to be read to her.[1689] The following are the contents of the missive:

[Footnote 1688: Perceval de Cagny, pp. 164, 165. _Chronique de Tournai_, vol. iii, in the _Recueil des chroniques de Flandre_, ed. Smedt, p.

414.]

[Footnote 1689: _Trial_, vol. i, pp. 82, 83.]

”My very dear Lady, I commend myself humbly to you, and I entreat you, for G.o.d's sake, that seeing the divisions which are at present in the holy Church Universal, concerning the question of the popes (for there are three contending for the papacy: one dwells at Rome and calls himself Martin V, whom all Christian kings obey: the other dwells at p.e.n.i.scola, in the kingdom of Valentia, and calls himself Clement VIII; the third dwells no man knows where, unless it be the Cardinal de Saint-Estienne and a few folk with him, and calls himself Pope Benedict XIV; the first, who is called Pope Martin, was elected at Constance by consent of all Christian nations; he who is called Clement was elected at p.e.n.i.scola, after the death of Pope Benedict XIII, by three of his cardinals; the third who is called Pope Benedict XIV was elected secretly at p.e.n.i.scola, by that same Cardinal Saint-Estienne himself): I pray you beseech Our Lord Jesus Christ that in his infinite mercy, he declare unto us through you, which of the three aforesaid is the true pope and whom it shall be his pleasure that henceforth we obey, him who is called Martin, or him who is called Clement or him who is called Benedict; and in whom we should believe, either in secret or under reservation or by public p.r.o.nouncement: for we shall all be ready to work the will and the pleasure of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Yours in all things,

COUNT D'ARMAGNAC.”[1690]

[Footnote 1690: _Ibid._, pp. 245, 246.]

He who wrote thus, calling Jeanne his very dear lady, recommending himself humbly to her, not in self-abas.e.m.e.nt, but merely, as we should say to-day, out of courtesy, was one of the greater va.s.sals of the crown.

<script>