Volume I Part 43 (2/2)
”I am very much obliged for your kind congratulations about the LL.D.
Why the Senate conferred it on me I know not in the least. I was astonished to hear that the R. Prof. of Divinity and several other great Dons attended, and several such men have subscribed, as I am informed, for the picture for the University to commemorate the honour conferred on me.”
LETTER 283. TO W. BOWMAN.
(283/1. We have not discovered to what prize the following letter to the late Sir W. Bowman (the well known surgeon) refers.)
Down, February 22nd, 1878.
I received your letter this morning, and it was quite impossible that you should receive an answer by 4 p.m. to-day. But this does not signify in the least, for your proposal seems to me a very good one, and I most entirely agree with you that it is far better to suggest some special question rather than to have a general discussion compiled from books. The rule that the Essay must be ”ill.u.s.trative of the wisdom and beneficence of the Almighty” would confine the subjects to be proposed.
With respect to the Vegetable Kingdom, I could suggest two or three subjects about which, as it seems to me, information is much required; but these subjects would require a long course of experiment, and unfortunately there is hardly any one in this country who seems inclined to devote himself to experiments.
LETTER 284. TO J. TORBITT.
(284/1. Mr. Torbitt was engaged in trying to produce by methodical selection and cross-fertilisation a fungus-proof race of the potato. The plan is fully described in the ”Life and Letters,” III., page 348.
The following letter is given in additional ill.u.s.tration of the keen interest Mr. Darwin took in the project.)
Down, Monday, March 4th, 1878.
I have nothing good to report. Mr. Caird called upon me yesterday; both he and Mr. Farrer (284/2. The late Lord Farrer.) have been most energetic and obliging. There is no use in thinking about the Agricultural Society. Mr. Caird has seen several persons on the subject, especially Mr. Carruthers, Botanist to the Society. He (Mr. Carruthers) thinks the attempt hopeless, but advances in a long memorandum sent to Mr. Caird, reasons which I am convinced are not sound. He specifies two points, however, which are well worthy of your consideration--namely, that a variety should be tested three years before its soundness can be trusted; and especially it should be grown under a damp climate. Mr.
Carruthers' opinion on this head is valuable because he was employed by the Society in judging the varieties sent in for the prize offered a year or two ago. If I had strength to get up a memorial to Government, I believe that I could succeed; for Sir J. Hooker writes that he believes you are on the right path; but I do not know to whom else to apply whose judgment would have weight with Government, and I really have not strength to discuss the matter and convert persons.
At Mr. Farrer's request, when we hoped the Agricultural Society might undertake it, I wrote to him a long letter giving him my opinion on the subject; and this letter Mr. Caird took with him yesterday, and will consider with Mr. Farrer whether any application can be made to Government.
I am, however, far from sanguine. I shall see Mr. Farrer this evening, and will do what I can. When I receive back my letter I will send it to you for your perusal.
After much reflection it seems to me that your best plan will be, if we fail to get Government aid, to go on during the present year, on a reduced scale, in raising new cross-fertilised varieties, and next year, if you are able, testing the power of endurance of only the most promising kind. If it were possible it would be very advisable for you to get some grown on the wet western side of Ireland. If you succeed in procuring a fungus-proof variety you may rely on it that its merits would soon become known locally and it would afterwards spread rapidly far and wide. Mr. Caird gave me a striking instance of such a case in Scotland. I return home to-morrow morning.
I have the pleasure to enclose a cheque for 100 pounds. If you receive a Government grant, I ought to be repaid.
P.S. If I were in your place I would not expend any labour or money in publis.h.i.+ng what you have already done, or in sending seeds or tubers to any one. I would work quietly on till some sure results were obtained.
And these would be so valuable that your work in this case would soon be known. I would also endeavour to pa.s.s as severe a judgment as possible on the state of the tubers and plants.
LETTER 285. TO E. VON MOJSISOVICS. Down, June 1st, 1878.
I have at last found time to read [the] first chapter of your ”Dolomit Riffe” (285/1. ”Dolomitriffe Sudtirols und Venetiens.” Wien, 1878.), and have been exceedingly interested by it. What a wonderful change in the future of geological chronology you indicate, by a.s.suming the descent-theory to be established, and then taking the graduated changes of the same group of organisms as the true standard! I never hoped to live to see such a step even proposed by any one. (285/2. Published in ”Life and Letters,” III., pages 234, 235.)
Nevertheless, I saw dimly that each bed in a formation could contain only the organisms proper to a certain depth, and to other there existing conditions, and that all the intermediate forms between one marine species and another could rarely be preserved in the same place and bed. Oppel, Neumayr, and yourself will confer a lasting and admirable service on the n.o.ble science of Geology, if you can spread your views so as to be generally known and accepted.
With respect to the continental and oceanic periods common to the whole northern hemisphere, to which you refer, I have sometimes speculated that the present distribution of the land and sea over the world may have formerly been very different to what it now is; and that new genera and families may have been developed on the sh.o.r.es of isolated tracts in the south, and afterwards spread to the north.
LETTER 286. TO J.W. JUDD. Down, June 27th, 1878.
I am heartily glad to hear of your intended marriage. A good wife is the supreme blessing in this life, and I hope and believe from what you say that you will be as happy as I have been in this respect. May your future geological work be as valuable as that which you have already done; and more than this need not be wished for any man. The practical teaching of Geology seems an excellent idea.
Many thanks for Neumayr, (286/1. Probably a paper on ”Die Congerien und Paludinenschichten Slavoniens und deren Fauna. Ein Beitrag zur Descendenz-Theorie,” ”Wien. Geol. Abhandl.” VII. (Heft 3), 1874-82.), but I have already received and read a copy of the same, or at least of a very similar essay, and admirably good it seemed to me.
This essay, and one by Mojsisovics (286/2. See note to Letter 285.), which I have lately read, show what Palaeontology in the future will do for the cla.s.sification and sequence of formations. It delighted me to see so inverted an order of proceeding--viz., the a.s.suming the descent of species as certain, and then taking the changes of closely allied forms as the standard of geological time. My health is better than it was a few years ago, but I never pa.s.s a day without much discomfort and the sense of extreme fatigue.
<script>