Part 44 (1/2)
”Go on,” said the Minister. ”Voltaire, Diderot, and their like have done much to educate our ears.”
The Controller-General was all attention, and his neighbor, Madame de Genlis, became absorbed. The stranger still hesitated. Then Beaumarchais exclaimed impetuously:
”Come, proceed, Maitre! Do not you know that when the laws leave folks so little liberty, people revenge themselves by laxity of manners?”
So the lawyer went on:
”Whether it was that certain ideas were fermenting in my soul, or that I was prompted by some unknown power, I said to her:
”'Ah, madame, you committed a very great crime.'
”'Which?' she asked in a deep voice.
”'That for which the signal was given by the Palace clock on the 24th of August.'
”She smiled scornfully, and some deep furrows showed on her pallid cheeks.
”'Do you call that a crime?' replied she; 'it was only an accident. The undertaking was badly managed, and the good result we looked for failed--for France, for all Europe, and for the Catholic Church. How could we help it? Our orders were badly carried out. We could not find so many Montlucs as we needed. Posterity will not give us credit for the defective communications which hindered us from giving our work the unity of impulse which is necessary to any great _Coup d'etat_; that was our misfortune. If by the 25th of August not the shadow of a Huguenot had been left in France, I should have been regarded to the remotest posterity as a n.o.ble incarnation of Providence. How often have the clear-seeing spirits of Sixtus V., of Richelieu, of Bossuet, secretly accused me of having failed in my undertaking, after daring to conceive of it! And how many regrets attended my death!
”'The disease was still rife thirty years after that Saint-Bartholomew's night; and it had caused the shedding of ten times more n.o.ble blood in France than was left to be shed on August 26, 1572. The revocation of the Edict of Nantes, for which you had medals struck, cost more tears, more blood and money, and killed more prosperity in France than three Saint-Bartholomews. Letellier, with a dip of ink, carried into effect the decree which the Crown had secretly desired since my day; but though on August 25, 1572, this tremendous execution was necessary, on August 25, 1685, it was useless. Under Henri de Valois' second son heresy was scarcely pregnant; under Henri de Bourbon's second son the teeming mother had cast her sp.a.w.n over the whole world.
”'You accuse me of crime, and you raise statues to the son of Anne of Austria! But he and I aimed at the same end. He succeeded; I failed; but Louis XIV. found the Protestants disarmed, while in my day they had powerful armies, statesmen, captains, and Germany to back them.'
”On hearing these words slowly spoken, I felt within me a tremulous thrill.
I seemed to scent the blood of I know not what victims. Catherine had grown before me. She stood there like an evil genius, and I felt as if she wanted to get into my conscience to find rest there----”
”He must have dreamed that,” said Beaumarchais, in a low voice. ”He certainly never invented it.”
”'My reason is confounded,' said I to the Queen. 'You pride yourself on an action which three generations have condemned and held accursed, and----'
”'Add,' said she, 'that writers have been more unjust to me than my contemporaries were. No one undertakes my defence. I am accused of ambition--I who was so rich and a Queen. I am taxed with cruelty--I who have but two decapitations on my conscience. And to the most impartial minds I am still, no doubt, a great riddle. Do you really believe that I was governed by feelings of hatred, that I breathed only vengeance and fury?' She smiled scornfully. 'I was as calm and cold as Reason itself. I condemned the Huguenots without pity, but without anger; they were the rotten orange in my basket. If I had been Queen of England, I should have judged the Catholics in the same way, if they had been seditious. To give our power any vitality at that period, only one G.o.d could be allowed in the State, only one faith and one master. Happily for me, I left my excuse recorded in one sentence. When Birague brought me a false report of the loss of the battle of Dreux--”Well and good,” said I, ”then we will go to Sermon.”--Hate the leaders of the New Religion? I esteemed them highly, and I did not know them. If I ever felt an aversion for any political personage, it was for that cowardly Cardinal de Lorraine, and for his brother, a wily and brutal soldier, who had me watched by their spies. They were my children's enemies; they wanted to s.n.a.t.c.h the crown from them; I saw them every day, and they were more than I could bear. If we had not carried out the plan for Saint-Bartholomew's Day, the Guises would have done it with the help of Rome and its monks. The Ligue, which had no power till I had grown old, would have begun in 1573.'
”'But, madame,' said I, 'instead of commanding that horrible butchery--excuse my frankness--why did you not employ the vast resources of your political genius in giving the Reformers the wise inst.i.tutions which made Henri IV.'s reign so glorious and peaceful?'
”She smiled again, shrugging her shoulders, and her hollow wrinkles gave her pale features an ironical expression full of bitterness.
”'After a furious struggle a nation needs repose,' said she. 'That is the secret of that reign. But Henri IV. committed two irremediable blunders. He ought neither to have abjured Protestantism nor to have left France Catholic after his own conversion. He alone has ever been in a position to change the face of France without a shock. Either not a single stole, or not a single conventicle! That is what he ought to have seen. To leave two hostile principles at work in a government with nothing to balance them is a crime in a King; it is sowing the seed of revolutions. It belongs to G.o.d alone to leave good and evil for ever at odds in the work of His hand. But this sentence was perhaps inscribed at the foundations of Henri IV.'s policy, and perhaps it was what led to his death. It is impossible that Sully should not have cast a covetous eye on the immense possessions of the clergy--though the clergy were not their sole masters, for the n.o.bles dissipated at least two-thirds of the Church revenues. Sully the Reformer owned abbeys nevertheless.' She paused, to think, as it seemed.
”'But does it occur to you,' said she, 'that you are asking a Pope's niece her reason for remaining Catholic?'--Again she paused--'And, after all, I would just as soon have been a Calvinist,' she went on, with a gesture of indifference. 'Can the superior men of your age still think that religion had really anything to do with that great trial, the most tremendous of those that Europe has been required to decide--a vast revolution r.e.t.a.r.ded by trivial causes, which will not hinder it from overflowing the whole world, since I failed to stop it.--A revolution,' said she, with a look of deep meaning, 'which is still progressing, and which you may achieve.--Yes, _You_, who hear me!'
”I shuddered.
”'What! Has no one yet understood that old interests on one hand, and on the other new interests, had taken Rome and Luther to be their standards of battle! What! When Louis IX., to avoid a somewhat kindred struggle, dragged after him a population a hundred times greater than that I condemned to death, and left them in the sands of Egypt, he earned the t.i.tle of Saint, while I!--But I,' she added, 'failed.'
”She looked down and stood silent for a minute. It was no longer a Queen that I beheld, but rather one of those Druidesses of old who sacrificed men, and could unroll the pages of the future while exhuming the lore of the past. But she presently raised her royal and majestic face.
”'By directing the attention of the middle cla.s.ses to the abuses of the Roman Church,' said she, 'Luther and Calvin gave birth in Europe to a spirit of investigation which inevitably led the nations to examine everything. Examination leads to doubt. Instead of the faith indispensable to social existence, they brought in their train, and long after them, an inquisitive philosophy, armed with hammers, and greedy of destruction.
Science, with its false lights, sprang glittering from the womb of heresy.