Part 7 (2/2)
The picture needs but be presented one moment before a calm, dispa.s.sionate eye, to force on us the conviction that, if in any human transaction we are free to accept, and free to reject the offers of another, we are clearly so in this.
There are those who, pa.s.sing to the opposite extreme, entertain the opinion that love is a sentiment, not only subject to human control, but capable of being entirely suppressed. They deem it altogether optional with themselves, whether they shall know anything of the affection between the s.e.xes, or not.
Did this notion extend only to the relative power of the s.e.xes, or the direction we may give to our hearts, it would be less objectionable. For doubtless love, though more essential to woman than to man, can be more easily controlled by her than by him. A person of a strong will may bring herself, for prudential considerations, to prefer in marriage one who will be ”a good match” with her, as the phrase is, to another whom she sincerely loves. And she may succeed in subduing, to no ordinary degree, her affection for the rejected one. But to eradicate from the heart the powerful principle of love is not given, I believe, to woman.
She may subst.i.tute another object for that which ought to have engaged this cla.s.s of her affections. A mother, or sister, or a friend, may be installed in that place. Nay, I have known a mere animal to be caressed and apparently loved, as it could not have been, had the affections been properly bestowed on a human being. We can regulate and direct, but we cannot destroy, in the heart, the sentiment of love.
Some, again, a.s.sociate with the thought of love the idea of our Lower Propensities. They regard it as an animal pa.s.sion, and as debasing to the character. With false notions of delicacy, they determine to shun its snares, and hence strive to banish the impure thing from their minds, and to steel themselves against its access.
How unworthy of our nature, and of the Being who formed us, is this view. To those who entertain it, we must say, ”what G.o.d hath cleansed, that call not thou common, or unclean.” Far, indeed, are they, to whom we allude, from the elevated and true idea of that sacred tie, which joins the pure in heart. A better knowledge of their race would acquaint them with mult.i.tudes, who have proved marriage to be ”honorable,” and to whom love has been the chief refiner of their souls. That it may be perverted, we cannot, of course, deny. But that its legitimate tendency, is any other than to exalt, enn.o.ble, and sanctify the spirit, we do not believe. So thorough is our persuasion of this, that we would commend the marriage relation to a seeker of moral excellence. We would say, that, in the hallowed sympathies of love are incitements to purity and piety. To her who earnestly desires to become spiritual, we would present the a.s.sociation in marriage with one spiritually minded, as, above all advent.i.tious means, friendly to her holy purpose.
To how many is love a theme for Jesting and Sport. The ancients represented Cupid under the aspect of a boy engaged in amus.e.m.e.nt. He appears driving a hoop, throwing a quoit, playing with a nymph, catching a b.u.t.terfly, or flying with a bright torch in his hand, shewing, in each case, that love is a subject for sport. Let heathenism, if it must, so regard it; but the Christian ought never to trifle with this sacred interest. The rite of marriage is a solemn thing. Who would jeer, and jest, as she stood before the altar, and pledged fidelity unto death to her betrothed partner? And why, I would ask, should the preliminaries of marriage be treated as a theme fit only for levity and merriment? It is said that we Americans are peculiar for banter on this subject. One scarcely hears it alluded to in society, except with a laugh, or a jest.
As a natural consequence of this state of feeling, and this style of conversation relative to the affections, it is not easy to know when one speaks as he means on this topic. Not ”seriously,”--for the matter is all sport,--not in ”sober earnest” may you take what is said, since soberness is supposed to be wholly irrelevant to so light a subject.
And then too the effect of this practice on the feelings and deportment of the parties most nearly concerned, even during their engagement,--if this take place amid the bandying of jests,--is often unhappy. The same levity pervades their conversation and manners toward one another; and there is scarcely one sober sentiment, or calm thought, a.s.sociated with their interviews.
So also has this habit a blighting influence upon the views with which the individuals are at length joined in marriage. What was commenced in gaiety and sport, and has been continued in the same spirit, is consummated in thoughtlessness. It is only when these scenes of mutual delusion and folly are over, and the two beings are united by an inseparable bond, and begin to feel the pressure of real duty and actual life, that they look on each other as rational creatures ought. The words, sacred, and principle, the thought of responsibility to G.o.d, ideas of solemnity, are now for the first time a.s.sociated with marriage.
Can this condition of mind be other than deleterious to the virtue, peace and happiness, of the parties involved in its effects? ”O there is nothing holier, in this life of ours, than the first consciousness of love,--the first rising sound and breath of that wind, which is so soon to sweep through the soul, to purify, or to destroy!” So let every young maiden deem of this sentiment. None will then banter words with her upon her sacred affections; for there will be that in her air and language, when this topic is referred to, which shall convince every one that she holds it a consecrated theme.
In summing up my general remarks on the view to be taken of love, I would say, talk little with your companions about it; and resolve, if the topic can only be introduced by a jest, that you will preserve upon it a profound silence. This would at first make you appear singular. But such a course would soon commend itself to every considerate friend and acquaintance in your circle. Or, if some should persist in importuning and teazing you in regard to it, you would be sustained by the consciousness of exerting all your influence for the elevation of society in their views, and conversation, on the most holy of human connections.
Nor should the mind be permitted to dwell constantly upon this subject.
Some are perpetually imagining themselves in love; others are dreaming over the philosophy of the affections, and wasting precious hours upon that which adds nothing to their happiness, and does little to prepare them for married life. Let the mind be kept tranquil on this subject; the heart will then be preserved in its soundness. No good affection will die or decay, but, in the time and method ordained by Providence, advances will be made, and the heart addressed, and the hand solicited for marriage. Let the young maiden bide the pa.s.sing months in cheerfulness, and prepare herself for a Christian life. A character thus matured will give hope of the happiest results in new relations, and amid all the coming and unknown scenes that await her.
Chapter VII.
SINGLE LIFE.
A wrong idea. Some designed for Single Life. The ”Old Maid's”
reproach. Addison. Two errors, Reserve, and Forwardness. Virtues of Single women. Humanity. Modesty. Economy. Neatness. Usefulness.
Hannah More. Miss Sedgwick. Miss Porter's ”Aunt Rebecca.” Avoid affectation. Advice of Mrs. Hall. Two essentials, Mental Cultivation, and Industry.
Marriage is not seldom regarded as ”our being's end and aim;” hence a young woman is often filled with a feverish anxiety to form this connection, or at least to enter on its preliminaries, at an early period of her life. We believe there are thousands, who never so much as ask themselves the question, ”Is it certain that I must be married, or be miserable?” No, they a.s.sume that in one condition only can they be happy, and in that, therefore, let what may betide them, they must centre their every hope of coming peace.
Now I believe this impression to be erroneous; and so disastrous are its consequences, that it should be removed from the mind of every girl who entertains it. G.o.d has not left woman but one alternative in this respect. Marriage is the general lot of her s.e.x. It is productive of joys and blessings peculiar to itself. But not always, not of necessity.
There may be, and there doubtless often is, great suffering in this connection. No small share of this might be ultimately traced to the fact that so many form this tie under the belief that they _must_ be married; that all which concerns them is to ascertain who the individual is, in whose hands they must place their whole earthly destiny.
But although Providence did intend woman, in all ordinary cases, to enter the marriage state, yet precisely as much did He design some of this s.e.x to remain single. He made all for the sake of character, usefulness, and happiness. Every inst.i.tution he appointed was to be instrumental to the production of these three grand objects. Hence woman was not made for marriage; but marriage for woman. If in any instance it shall appear that her improvement will probably be r.e.t.a.r.ded by her entering that state, or her usefulness less extensive, or her happiness evidently sacrificed, then is it manifest that she belongs to the cla.s.s of exceptions. It is her duty to continue unmarried. So that it is not simply a choice among many suitors, with the necessity of selecting or accepting some one of them, that is given her, but the whole subject is to be seriously pondered. If, after doing this, she is convinced that no individual has offered her particular attentions, whose character promises to enhance her virtue, usefulness, or happiness, then should she calmly resolve,--let the decision be painful, as it may, and perhaps must be,--that she will remain, under present prospects, through life, as she is.
But the reproach of being an ”old maid,” how can she endure this? I answer, let her not, in the first place, unduly magnify this reproach. I know that certain charges are preferred against ”old maids,” as this cla.s.s are ignominiously termed, which do much to strengthen the impression just spoken of. They are said to possess an inordinate curiosity. Addison, like many others, alleges that old maids are given to credulity, and pours on them, for this reason, contempt and raillery.
They are accused of disgusting affectation, of pretending to youth, to censorial importance, and to an exquisite sensibility. Finally, it is said, that they are notorious for envy, and ill-nature, being match-breakers, because themselves unmarried. Let these charges be dest.i.tute as they may of foundation, they doubtless impel many females to the determination that they must and will escape this terrific condition.
But there is no portion of the community, whose opinion we should value, that will esteem a female the less for being in that condition where Providence has clearly placed her. It is not true that single ladies are usually despised, or subject to ridicule. Those who do suffer these things, have usually brought them upon themselves by a deportment, which might have been shunned.
Some have been derided for their excessive Reservedness of manner, for never permitting one of the opposite s.e.x to address them, even indirectly, or scarcely to exchange a word with them. What else can the prude antic.i.p.ate, or reasonably require, than that she be an object of reproach, if not of ridicule, for obstinately adhering to a manner that must result in her perpetual singleness of life? If she debar all access to herself, except from her own s.e.x, misinterpret every word and all intimations of, and thus insulate herself from, any special acquaintance with any gentleman, let her bear the consequences without a syllable of discontent. A morbid sensitiveness, in reference to all such company, must, in most cases, seal one's doom.
Perhaps a young maiden takes the opposite extreme. In her anxiety to fulfil what she deems her only possible destiny, she becomes Forward and a.s.suming. She regards it as necessary to force attention toward herself.
<script>