Volume III Part 48 (2/2)
[1014] Mordecai: _Richmond in By-Gone Days_, 68.
[1015] According to a story, told more than a century after the incident occurred, Marshall did not know, when he accepted Wickham's invitation, that Burr was to be a guest, but heard of that fact before the dinner.
His wife, thereupon, advised him not to go, but, out of regard for Wickham, he attended. (Thayer: _John Marshall_, 80-81.)
This tale is almost certainly a myth. Professor Thayer, to whom it was told by an unnamed descendant of Marshall, indicates plainly that he had little faith in it.
The facts that, at the time, even the _Enquirer_ acquitted Marshall of any knowledge that Burr was to be present; that the prudence of the Chief Justice was admitted by his bitterest enemies; that so gross an indiscretion would have been obvious to the most reckless; that Marshall, of all men, would not have embarra.s.sed himself in such fas.h.i.+on, particularly at a time when public suspicion was so keen and excitement so intense--render it most improbable that he knew that Burr was to be at the Wickham dinner.
[1016] _Enquirer_, April 10 and 28, 1807.
CHAPTER VIII
ADMINISTRATION VERSUS COURT
In substance Jefferson said that if Marshall should suffer Burr to escape, Marshall himself should be removed from office.
(Henry Adams.)
It becomes our duty to lay the evidence before the public. Go into any expense necessary for this purpose. (Jefferson.)
The President has let slip the dogs of war, the h.e.l.l-hounds of persecution, to hunt down my friend. (Luther Martin.)
If you cannot exorcise the demon of prejudice, you can chain him down to law and reason. (Edmund Randolph.)
On May 22, 1807, the hall of the House of Delegates at Richmond was densely crowded long before the hour of half-past twelve, when John Marshall took his seat upon the bench and opened court. So occupied was every foot of s.p.a.ce that it was with difficulty that a pa.s.sage was opened through which the tall, awkwardly moving, and negligently clad Chief Justice could make his way. By Marshall's side sat Cyrus Griffin, Judge of the District Court, who throughout the proceedings was negligible.
The closely packed spectators accurately portrayed the dress, manners, and trend of thought of the American people of that period. Gentlemen in elegant attire--hair powdered and queues tied in silk, knee breeches and silver buckles, long rich cloth coats cut half away at the waist, ruffled s.h.i.+rts and high stocks--were conspicuous against the background of the majority of the auditors, whose apparel, however, was no less picturesque.
This audience was largely made up of men from the smaller plantations, men from the mountains, men from the backwoods, men from the frontiers.
Red woolen s.h.i.+rts; rough homespun or corduroy trousers, held up by ”galluses”; fringed deerskin coats and ”leggings” of the same material kept in place by leather belts; hair sometimes tied by strings in uncouth queues, but more often hanging long and unconfined--in such garb appeared the greater part of the attendance at the trial of Aaron Burr.
In forty years there had been but little change in the general appearance of Virginians[1017] except that fewer wore the old dignified and becoming attire of well-dressed men.
Nearly all of them were Republicans, plain men, devoted to Jefferson as the exponent of democracy and the heaven-sent leader of the people.
Among these Jeffersonians, however, were several who, quite as much as the stiffest Federalists, prided themselves upon members.h.i.+p in the ”upper cla.s.ses.”
Nearly all of the Republicans present, whether of the commonalty or the gentry, were against Aaron Burr. Scattered here and there were a few Federalists--men who were convinced that democracy meant the ruin of the Republic, and who profoundly believed that Jefferson was nothing more than an intriguing, malicious demagogue--most of whom looked upon Burr with an indulgent eye. So did an occasional Republican, as now and then a lone Federalist denounced Burr's villainy.
The good-sized square boxes filled with sand that were placed at infrequent intervals upon the floor of the improvised court-room were too few to receive the tobacco juice that filled the mouths of most of the spectators before it was squirted freely upon the floor and wall.
Those who did not chew the weed either smoked big cigars and fat pipes or contented themselves with taking snuff.[1018] Upon recess or adjournment of court, all, regularly and without loss of time, repaired to the nearest saloons or taverns and strengthened themselves, with generous draughts of whiskey or brandy, taken ”straight,” for a firmer, clearer grasp of the points made by counsel.
Never, in its history, had Richmond been so crowded with strangers.
Nearly five thousand people now dwelt in the Virginia Capital, the site of which was still ”untamed and broken” by ”inaccessible heights and deep ravines.”[1019] Thousands of visitors had come from all over the country to witness the prosecution of that fallen angel whose dark deeds, they had been made to believe, had been in a fair way to destroy the Nation. The inns could shelter but an insignificant fraction of them, and few were the private houses that did not take in men whom the taverns could not accommodate. Hundreds brought covered wagons or tents and camped under the trees or on the river-banks near the city.
Correspondents of the press of the larger cities were present, among them the youthful[1020] Was.h.i.+ngton Irving, who wrote one or two articles for a New York paper.
<script>