Part 30 (1/2)

233. Statements of Article XI on Consolation Offered by Predestination.

The purpose of the entire Scripture, says the _Formula of Concord_, is to comfort penitent sinners. If we therefore abide by, and cleave to, predestination as it is revealed to us in G.o.d's Word, ”it is a very useful, salutary, consolatory doctrine.” Every presentation of eternal election, however which produces carnal security or despair, is false.

We read: ”If any one presents the doctrine concerning the gracious election of G.o.d in such a manner that troubled Christians cannot derive comfort from it, but are thereby incited to despair, or that the impenitent are confirmed in their wantonness, it is undoubtedly sure and true that such a doctrine is taught, not according to the Word and will of G.o.d, but according to [the blind judgment of human] reason and the instigation of the devil. For, as the apostle testifies, Rom. 15, 4: 'Whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope.'

But when this consolation and hope are weakened or entirely removed by Scripture, it is certain that it is understood and explained contrary to the will and meaning of the Holy Ghost.” (1093, 91f., 837, 16; 1077, 43.)

Predestination is comforting when Christians are taught to seek their election in Christ. We read: ”Moreover, this doctrine gives no one a cause either for despondency or for a shameless, dissolute life, namely, when men are taught that they must seek eternal election in Christ and His holy Gospel, as in the Book of Life, which excludes no penitent sinner, but beckons and calls all the poor, heavy-laden, and troubled sinners who are disturbed by the sense of G.o.d's wrath, to repentance and the knowledge of their sins and to faith in Christ, and promises the Holy Ghost for purification and renewal, and thus gives the most enduring consolation to all troubled, afflicted men, that they know that their salvation is not placed in their own hands (for otherwise they would lose it much more easily than was the case with Adam and Eve in Paradise, yea, every hour and moment), but in the gracious election of G.o.d which He has revealed to us in Christ, out of whose hand no man shall pluck us, John 10, 28; 2 Tim. 2, 19.” (1093, 89.)

In order to manifest its consolatory power predestination must be presented in proper relation to the revealed order of salvation. We read: ”With this revealed will of G.o.d [His universal, gracious promises in the Gospel] we should concern ourselves, follow and be diligently engaged upon it, because through the Word, whereby He calls us, the Holy Ghost bestows grace, power, and ability to this end [to begin and complete our salvation], and should not [attempt to] sound the abyss of G.o.d's hidden predestination, as it is written in Luke 13, 24, where one asks: 'Lord, are there few that be saved?' and Christ answers: 'Strive to enter in at the strait gate.' Accordingly, Luther says [in his Preface to the Epistle to the Romans]: 'Follow the Epistle to the Romans in its order, concern yourself first with Christ and His Gospel, that you may recognize your sins and His grace; next that you contend with sin, as Paul teaches from the first to the eighth chapter; then, when in the eighth chapter you will come into [will have been exercised by]

temptation under the cross and afflictions,--this will teach you in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh chapters how consolatory predestination is,'

etc.” (1073, 33.)

Predestination, properly taught, affords the glorious comfort that no one shall pluck us out of the almighty hands of Christ. The _Formula_ says: ”Thus this doctrine affords also the excellent glorious consolation that G.o.d was so greatly concerned about the conversion, righteousness, and salvation of every Christian, and so faithfully purposed it [provided therefor] that before the foundation of the world was laid, He deliberated concerning it, and in His [secret] purpose ordained how He would bring me thereto [call and lead me to salvation], and preserve me therein. Also, that He wished to secure my salvation so well and certainly that, since through the weakness and wickedness of our flesh it could easily be lost from our hands, or through craft and might of the devil and the world be s.n.a.t.c.hed and taken from us, He ordained it in His eternal purpose, which cannot fail or be overthrown, and placed it for preservation in the almighty hand of our Savior Jesus Christ, from which no one can pluck us, John 10, 28. Hence Paul also says, Rom. 8, 28. 39: 'Because we have been called according to the purpose of G.o.d, who will separate us from the love of G.o.d in Christ?'

[Paul builds the certainty of our blessedness upon the foundation of the divine purpose, when, from our being called according to the purpose of G.o.d, he infers that no one can separate us, etc.]” (1079, 45.) ”This article also affords a glorious testimony that the Church of G.o.d will exist and abide in opposition to all the gates of h.e.l.l, and likewise teaches which is the true Church of G.o.d, lest we be offended by the great authority [and majestic appearance] of the false Church, Rom. 9, 24. 25.” (1079, 50.)

Especially in temptations and tribulations the doctrine of eternal election reveals its comforting power. We read: ”Moreover, this doctrine affords glorious consolation under the cross and amid temptations, namely, that G.o.d in His counsel, before the time of the world determined and decreed that He would a.s.sist us in all distresses [anxieties and perplexities], grant patience, give consolation, excite [nourish and encourage] hope, and produce such an outcome as would contribute to our salvation. Also, as Paul in a very consolatory way treats this, Rom. 8, 28. 29. 35. 38. 39, that G.o.d in His purpose has ordained before the time of the world by what crosses and sufferings He would conform every one of His elect to the image of His Son, and that to every one his cross shall and must work together for good, because they are called according to the purpose, whence Paul has concluded that it is certain and indubitable that neither tribulation nor distress, nor death, nor life, etc., shall be able to separate us from the love of G.o.d which is in Christ Jesus, our Lord.” (1079, 48.)

XXI. Luther and Article XI of the Formula of Concord.

234. Luther Falsely Charged with Calvinism.

Calvinists and Synergists have always contended that Luther's original doctrine of predestination was essentially identical with that of John Calvin. Melanchthon was among the first who raised a charge to this effect. In his _Opinion_ to Elector August, dated March 9, 1559, we read: ”During Luther's life and afterwards I rejected these Stoic and Manichean deliria, when Luther and others wrote: All works, good and bad, in all men, good and bad, must occur as they do. Now it is apparent that such speech contradicts the Word of G.o.d, is detrimental to all discipline and blasphemes G.o.d. Therefore I have sedulously made a distinction, showing to what extent man has a free will to observe outward discipline, also before regeneration,” etc. (_C. R._ 9, 766.) Instead of referring to his own early statements, which were liable to misinterpretation more than anything that Luther had written, Melanchthon disingenuously mentions Luther, whose real meaning he misrepresents and probably had never fully grasped. The true reason why Melanchthon charged Luther and his loyal adherents with Stoicism was his own synergistic departure from the Lutheran doctrine of original sin and of salvation by grace alone. Following Melanchthon, rationalizing Synergists everywhere have always held that without abandoning Luther's doctrine of original sin and of the _gratia sola_ there is no escape from Calvinism.

In this point Reformed theologians agree with the Synergists, and have therefore always claimed Luther as their ally. I. Mueller declared in _Lutheri de Praedestionatione et Libero Arbitrio Doctrina_ of 1832: ”As to the chief point (_quod ad caput rei attinet_), Zwingli's view of predestination is in harmony with Luther's _De Servo Arbitrio_.” In his _Zentraldogmen_ of 1854 Alexander Schweizer endeavored to prove that the identical doctrine of predestination was originally the central dogma of the Lutheran as well as of the Zwinglian reformation. ”It is not so much the dogma [of predestination] itself,” said he (1, 445), ”as its position which is in dispute” among Lutherans and Calvinists. Schweizer (1, 483) based his a.s.sertion on the false a.s.sumption ”that the doctrines of the captive will and of absolute predestination [denial of universal grace] are two halves of the same ring.” (Frank 1, 12. 118. 128; 4, 262.) Similar contentions were made in America by Schaff, Hodge, Shedd, and other Reformed theologians.

As a matter of fact, however, also in the doctrine of predestination Zwingli and Calvin were just as far and as fundamentally apart from Luther as their entire rationalistic theology differed from the simple and implicit Scripturalism of Luther. Frank truly says that the agreement between Luther's doctrine and that of Zwingli and Calvin is ”only specious, _nur scheinbar_.” (1, 118.) Tschackert remarks: ”Whoever [among the theologians before the _Formula of Concord_] was acquainted with the facts could not but see that in this doctrine [of predestination] there was a far-reaching difference between the Lutheran and the Calvinistic theology.” (559.) F. Pieper declares that Luther and Calvin agree only in certain expressions, but differ entirely as to substance. (_Dogm_. 3, 554.)

The _Visitation Articles_, adopted 1592 as a norm of doctrine for Electoral Saxony, enumerate the following propositions on ”Predestination and the Eternal Providence of G.o.d” which must be upheld over against the Calvinists as ”the pure and true doctrine of our [Lutheran] churches”: ”1. That Christ has died for all men, and as the Lamb of G.o.d has borne the sins of the whole world. 2. That G.o.d created no one for condemnation, but will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth. He commands all to hear His Son Christ in the Gospel, and promises by it the power and working of the Holy Ghost for conversion and salvation. 3. That many men are condemned by their own guilt who are either unwilling to hear the Gospel of Christ, or again fall from grace, by error against the foundation or by sins against conscience. 4. That all sinners who repent are received into grace and no one is excluded, even though his sins were as scarlet, since G.o.d's mercy is much greater than the sins of all the world, and G.o.d has compa.s.sion on all His works.” (CONC. TRIGL. 1153.) Not one of these propositions, which have always been regarded as a summary of the Lutheran teaching in contradistinction from Calvinism, was ever denied by Luther.

235. Summary of Luther's Views.

Luther distinguished between the hidden and the revealed or ”proclaimed”

G.o.d, the secret and revealed will of G.o.d; the majestic G.o.d in whom we live and move and have our being, and G.o.d manifest in Christ; G.o.d's unsearchable judgments and ways past finding out, and His merciful promises in the Gospel. Being truly G.o.d and not an idol, G.o.d, according to Luther, is both actually omnipotent and omniscient. Nothing can exist or occur without His power, and everything surely will occur as He has foreseen it. This is true of the thoughts, volitions, and acts of all His creatures. He would not be G.o.d if there were any power not derived from, or supplied by Him, or if the actual course of events could annul His decrees and stultify His knowledge. Also the devils and the wicked are not beyond His control.

As for evil, though G.o.d does not will or cause it,--for, on the contrary, He prohibits sin and truly deplores the death of a sinner--yet sin and death could never have entered the world without His permission.

Also the will of fallen man receives its power to will from G.o.d, and its every resolve and consequent act proceeds just as G.o.d has foreseen, ordained, or permitted it. The evil quality of all such acts, however, does not emanate from G.o.d, but from the corrupt will of man. Hence free will, when defined as the power of man to nullify and subvert what G.o.d's majesty has foreseen and decreed, is a nonent, a mere empty t.i.tle. This, however, does not involve that the human will is coerced or compelled to do evil, nor does it exclude in fallen man the ability to choose in matters temporal and subject to reason.

But while holding that we must not deny the majesty and the mysteries of G.o.d, Luther did not regard these, but Christ crucified and justification by faith in the promises of the Gospel, as the true objects of our concern. Nor does he, as did Calvin, employ predestination as a corrective and regulative norm for interpreting, limiting, invalidating, annulling, or casting doubt upon, any of the blessed truths of the Gospel. Luther does not modify the revealed will of G.o.d in order to harmonize it with G.o.d's sovereignty. He does not place the hidden G.o.d in opposition to the revealed G.o.d, nor does he reject the one in order to maintain the other. He denies neither the revealed universality of G.o.d's grace, of Christ's redemption, and of the efficaciousness of the Holy Spirit in the means of grace, nor the unsearchable judgments and ways of G.o.d's majesty. Even the Reformed theologian A. Schweizer admits as much when he says in his _Zentraldogmen_ (1, 445): ”In the Zwinglio-Calvinian type of doctrine, predestination is a dogma important as such and regulating the other doctrines, yea, as Martyr, Beza, and others say, the chief part of Christian doctrine; while in the Lutheran type of doctrine it is merely a dogma supporting other, more important central doctrines.” (Frank 4, 264.)

Moreover, Luther most earnestly warns against all speculations concerning the hidden G.o.d as futile, foolish, presumptuous, and wicked.

The secret counsels, judgments, and ways of G.o.d cannot and must not be investigated. G.o.d's majesty is unfathomable, His judgments are unsearchable, His ways past finding out. Hence, there is not, and there cannot be, any human knowledge, understanding, or faith whatever concerning G.o.d in so far as He has not revealed Himself. For while the fact that there are indeed such things as mysteries, unsearchable judgments, and incomprehensible ways in G.o.d is plainly taught in the Bible, their nature, their how, why, and wherefore, has not been revealed to us and no amount of human ingenuity is able to supply the deficiency. Hence, in as far as G.o.d is still hidden and veiled, He cannot serve as a norm by which we are able to regulate our faith and life. Particularly when considering the question how G.o.d is disposed toward us individually, we must not take refuge in the secret counsels of G.o.d, which reason cannot spy and pry into. According to Luther, all human speculations concerning the hidden G.o.d are mere diabolical inspirations, bound to lead away from the saving truth of the Gospel into despair and destruction.

What G.o.d, therefore, would have men believe about His att.i.tude toward them, must according to Luther, be learned from the Gospel alone. The Bible tells us how G.o.d is disposed toward poor sinners, and how He wants to deal with them. Not His hidden majesty, but His only-begotten Son, born in Bethlehem, is the divinely appointed object of human investigation. Christ crucified is G.o.d manifest and visible to men.

Whoever has seen Christ has seen G.o.d. The Gospel is G.o.d's only revelation to sinful human beings. The Bible, the ministry of the Word, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and absolution are the only means of knowing how G.o.d is disposed toward us. To these alone G.o.d has directed us. With these alone men should occupy and concern themselves.

And the Gospel being the Word of G.o.d, the knowledge furnished therein is most reliable. Alarmed sinners may trust in its comforting promises with firm a.s.surance and unwavering confidence. In _De Servo Arbitrio_ Luther earnestly warns men not to investigate the hidden G.o.d, but to look to revelation for an answer to the question how G.o.d is minded toward them, and how He intends to deal with them. In his _Commentary on Genesis_ he refers to this admonition and repeats it, protesting that he is innocent if any one is misled to take a different course. ”I have added” [to the statements in _De Servo Arbitrio_ concerning necessity and the hidden G.o.d] Luther here declares, ”that we must look upon the revealed G.o.d.

_Addidi, quod aspiciendus sit Deus revelatus_.” (CONC. TRIGL. 898.)

This Bible-revelation, however, by which alone Luther would have men guided in judging G.o.d, plainly teaches both, that grace is universal, and that salvation is by grace alone. Luther always taught the universality of G.o.d's love and mercy, as well as of Christ's redemption, and the operation of the Holy Spirit in the means of grace. Also according to _De Servo Arbitrio_, G.o.d wants all men to be saved, and does not wish the death of sinners, but deplores and endeavors to remove it. Luther fairly revels in such texts as Ezek. 18, 23 and 31, 11: ”As I live, saith the Lord G.o.d, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?” He calls the above a ”glorious pa.s.sage” and ”that sweetest Gospel voice--_illam vocem dulcissimi Evangelii_.” (E. v. a. 7, 218.)

Thus Luther rejoiced in universal grace, because it alone was able to convince him that the Gospel promises embraced and included also him. In like manner he considered the doctrine that salvation is by grace alone to be most necessary and most comforting. Without this truth divine a.s.surance of salvation is impossible, with it, all doubts about the final victory of faith are removed. Luther was convinced that, if he were required to contribute anything to his own conversion, preservation, and salvation, he could never attain these blessings.

Nothing can save but the grace which is grace alone. In _De Servo Arbitrio_ everything is pressed into service to disprove and explode the a.s.sertion of Erasmus that the human will is able to and does ”work something in matters pertaining to salvation,” and to establish the monergism or sole activity of grace in man's conversion. (St. L. 18, 1686, 1688.)