Part 17 (1/2)

Speaking of George Meredith, we are told again (they dig the thing up every two or three years) that, when a reader for Chapman & Hall, he turned down ”East Lynne,” ”Erewhon,” and other books that afterward became celebrated. What of it? Meredith may not have known anything about literature, but he knew what he liked. Moreover, he was a marked and original writer, and as that tolerant soul, Jules Lemaitre, has noted, the most marked and original of writers are those who do not understand everything, nor feel everything, nor love everything, but those whose knowledge, intelligence, and tastes have definite limitations.

BUT WOULD IT NOT REQUIRE A GEOLOGIC PERIOD?

Sir: You are kind enough to refer to my lecture on ”Literary Taste and How to Acquire It.” I venture to suggest that your summary--viz.: ”It is to read only first-cla.s.s stuff,” not only fails to meet the problem, but represents exactly the view that I am out to demolish. If, as I presume, you mean that the ambitious person who now reads Harold Bell Wright should sit down to the works of Shakespeare, I can tell you at once that the process will be a failure. My method is one of graduation from the worst to the best stuff.

W. L. George.

We do not wish to crab W. L. George's act, ”Literary Taste and How to Acquire It,” but we know the answer. It is to read only first-cla.s.s stuff. Circ.u.mstances may oblige a man to write second-cla.s.s books, but there is no reason why he should read such.

THE STORM.

(_By a girl of ten years._)

It lightnings, it thunders And I go under, And where do I go, I wonder.

I go, I go-- I know.

Under the covers, That's where I go.

The little poet of the foregoing knew where she was going, which is more than can be said for many modern bards.

THE EIGHTH VEIL.

(_By J-mes Hun-k-r._)

There was a wedding under way. From the bright-lit mansion came the evocations of a loud ba.s.soon. Ulick Guffle, in whom the thought of matrimony always produced a bitter nausea, glowered upon the house and spat acridly upon the pave. ”Imbeciles! Humbugs! Romantic rot!” he raged.

Three young men drew toward the scene. Ulick barred their way, but two of the trio slipped by him and escaped. The third was nailed by Guffle's glittering eye. Ulick laid an ineluctable hand upon the stranger's arm.

”Listen!” he commanded. ”Matrimony and Art are sworn and natural foes.

Ingeborg Bunck was right; there are no illegitimate children; all children are valid. Sounds like Lope de Vega, doesn't it? But it isn't.

It is Bunck. Whitman, too, divined the truth. Love is a germ; sunlight kills it. It needs l'obscurite and a high temperature. As Baudelaire said--or was it Maurice Barres?--dans la nuit tous les chats sont gris.

Remy de Gourmont...”

The wedding guest beat his s.h.i.+rtfront; he could hear the ba.s.soon doubling the cello. But Ulick continued ineluctably. ”Woman is a sink of iniquity. Only Gounod is more loathsome. That Ave Maria--Grand Dieu! But Frederic Chopin, nuance, cadence, appoggiatura--there you have it. En amour, les vieux fous sont plus fous que les jeunes. Listen to Rochefoucauld! And Montaigne has said, C'est le jouir et non le posseder qui rend heureux. And Pascal has added, Les affaires sont les affaires.

As for Stendhal, Flaubert, Nietzsche, Edgar Saltus, Balzac, Gautier, Dostoievsky, Rabelais, Maupa.s.sant, Anatole France, Bourget, Turgenev, Verlaine, Renan, Walter Pater, Landor, Cardinal Newman and the Brothers Goncourt...”