Part 26 (1/2)

[32] An allusion to his opponents' doctrine of the complete freedom of the will, which Luther denied Compare his _De servo arbitrio_ (1525)

_Weimar Ed_, XVIII, 600 ff He finds in their treatic a practical expression of this doctrine of theirs

[33] Luther hu priesthood,

[34] Alveld

[35] _The res sacramenti_ The sacrament consisted of these two parts--(1) the _sacran, and (2) the _res sacrarace Another distinction is that between (1) _n, and (2) _forma_, or the words of institution or administration See below, p 223

[36] Cf _Weimar Ed_, VI, 505, note 1

[37] Cf Vol I, p 325, and _Realencyklopadie_, X, 289, pp 11 ff

[38] Cf _Weimar Ed_, VI, 506, note 2

[39] Cf W Kohler, _Luther unci die Kirchengeschichte_ (Erlangen, 1900), chap viii

[40] On the spiritual reception of the sacra, _Die Mystik Luthers_ (1879), pp 173 f Cf above, p 40

[41] See above, p 172

[42] John Wyclif (1384), the keenest of the mediaeval critics of the doctrine of transubstantiation

[43] Pierre d'Ailly (1425), ith his reatly influenced Luther

[44] The Sentences of Peter Loy

[45] In the dogma of transubstantiation (Fourth Lateran Council, 1215) the Church taught that the substance of bread and as changed into the substance of Christ's body and blood, while the accidents of the former--i e, their attributes, such as form, color, taste, etc--reen Ed_; the _Weimar Ed_ reads: _an accidentia ibi sint sine substantia_

[48] See above, p 20

[49] i e, the host, or wafer

[50] _Decretal Greg lib I, tit i, cap I, --3_

[51] See above, pp 26 ff

[52] See above, p 137

[54] Comp Vol I, pp 295 ff

[55] The Douay Version has here been followed

[56] See Luther's own definition above, pp 22 ff

[57] See above, p 181, note

[58] See above, p 198