Part 6 (1/2)
”Family life,” says Sainte-Beuve, ”may be full of thorns and cares; but they are fruitful: all others are dry thorns.” And again: ”If a man's home at a certain period of life does not contain children, it will probably be found filled with follies or with vices.”
Even if it were a misfortune to be married, which we emphatically deny, has not the old Roman moralist taught us that, ”to escape misfortune is to want instruction, and that to live at ease is to live in ignorance”?
Misfortune to be married? Rather not.
”Life with all it yields of joy and woe And hope and fear....
Is just our chance o' the prize of the learning love-- How love might be, hath been indeed, and is.”
CHAPTER VIII.
BEING MARRIED.
”If ever one is to pray--if ever one is to feel grave and anxious--if ever one is to shrink from vain show and vain babble, surely it is just on the occasion of two human beings binding themselves to one another, for better and for worse till death part them.”--_Letters and Memorials of Jane Welsh Carlyle._
An elderly unmarried lady of Scotland, after reading aloud to her two sisters, also unmarried, the births, marriages, and deaths in the ladies' corner of a newspaper, thus moralized: ”Weel, weel, these are solemn events--death and marriage; but ye ken they're what we must all come to.” ”Eh, Miss Jeanny, but ye have been lang spared!” was the reply of the youngest sister. Those who in our thoughts were represented as being only in prospect of marriage are spared no longer. They have now come to what they had to come to--a day ”so full of gladness, and so full of pain”--a day only second in importance to the day of birth; in a word, to their wedding day.
”Are [they] sad or merry?
Like to the time o' the year between the extremes Of hot and cold: [they are] nor sad nor merry.”
And yet few on such a day are as collected as the late Duke of Sutherland is said to have been. Just two hours before the time fixed for his marriage with one of the most beautiful women in England, a friend came upon him in St. James's Park, leaning carelessly over the railings at the edge of the water, throwing crumbs to the waterfowl.
”What! you here to-day! I thought you were going to be married this morning?” ”Yes,” replied the duke, without moving an inch or stopping his crumb-throwing, ”I believe I am.”
To men of a shyer and more nervous temperament, to be married without chloroform is a very painful operation. They find it difficult to screw their courage to the marrying place. On one occasion a bridegroom so far forgot what was due to himself and his bride as to render himself unfit to take the vows through too frequent recourse on the wedding morn to the cup that cheers--and inebriates. The minister was obliged to refuse to proceed with the marriage. A few days later, the same thing occurred with the same couple; whereupon the minister gravely remonstrated with the bride, and said they must not again present themselves with the bridegroom in such a state. ”But, sir, he--_he winna come when he's sober_,” was the candid rejoinder. It is possible that this bridegroom, whose courage was so very Dutch, might have been deterred by the impending fuss and publicity of a marriage ceremony, rather than by any fear of or want of affection for her who was to become his wife. Even in the best a.s.sorted marriages there is always more or less anxiety felt upon the wedding-day.
The possibility of a hitch arising from a sudden change of inclination on the part of the princ.i.p.als is ludicrously ill.u.s.trated by the case of two couples who on one occasion presented themselves at the Mayoralty, in a suburb of Paris, to carry out the civil portion of their marriage contract. During the ceremony one of the bridegrooms saw, or fancied he saw, his partner making ”sheep's-eyes” at the bridegroom opposite. Being of a jealous temperament, he laid his hand roughly on her arm, and said sharply: ”Mademoiselle, which of the two brides are you? You are mine, I believe: then oblige me by confining your glances to me.” The bride was a young woman of spirit, and resenting the tone in which the reprimand was made, retorted: ”Ah, Monsieur, if you are jealous already, I am likely to lead a pleasant life with you!” The jealous bridegroom made an angry reply; and then the other bridegroom must needs put his oar in.
This led to a general dispute, which the Mayor in vain endeavoured to quell. The bridegrooms stormed at each other; and the brides, between their hysterical sobs, mutually accused each other of perfidy. At length the Mayor, as a last resource, adjourned the ceremony for half an hour, to admit of an amicable understanding being arrived at, both brides having refused to proceed with the celebration of the nuptials. When, at the expiration of the half-hour, the parties were summoned to reappear, they did so, to the amazement of the bewildered Mayor, in an altogether different order from that in which they had originally entered. The bridegrooms had literally effected an exchange of brides--the jealous bridegroom taking the jealous bride; and the other, the lady whose fickle glances had led to the rupture. All four adhering to the new arrangement, the Mayor, it is recorded, had no alternative but to proceed with the ceremony.
The ruling pa.s.sion is not more strongly felt in death than in marriage.
Dr. Johnson displayed the st.u.r.diness of his character as he journeyed with the lady of his choice from Birmingham to Derby, at which last place they were to be married. Their ride thither, which we give in the bridegroom's own words, is an amusing bit of literary history. ”Sir, she had read the old romances, and had got into her head the fantastical notion that a woman of spirit should use her lover like a dog. So, sir, at first she told me that I rode too fast, and she could not keep up with me: and when I rode a little slower, she pa.s.sed me, and complained that I lagged behind. I was not to be made the slave of caprice; and I resolved to begin as I meant to end. I therefore pushed on briskly, till I was fairly out of her sight. The road lay between two hedges, so I was sure she could not miss it; and I contrived that she should soon come up with me. When she did, I observed her to be in tears.”
On the wedding-day of the celebrated M. Pasteur, who has made such extraordinary discoveries about germs, the hour appointed for the ceremony had arrived, but the bridegroom was not there. Some friends rushed off to the laboratory and found him very busy with his ap.r.o.n on.
He was excessively cross at being disturbed, and declared that marriage might wait, but his experiments could not do so.
He would indeed be a busy man who could not make time for a marriage ceremony as brief as that which was employed in the celebration of a marriage in Iowa, United States. The bride and bridegroom were told to join their hands, and then asked: ”Do you want one another?” Both replied: ”Yes.” ”Well, then, have one another;” and the couple were man and wife. Most people, however, desire a more reverent solemnization of marriage, which may be viewed in two aspects--as a natural inst.i.tution, and as a religious ordinance. In the Old Testament we see it as a natural inst.i.tution; in the New, it is brought before us in a religious light. It is there likened to the union of Christ and the Church. The union of Christ and the Church is not ill.u.s.trated by marriage, but marriage by this spiritual union; that is, the natural is based upon the spiritual. And this is what is wanted; it gives marriage a religious signification, and it thus becomes a kind of semi-sacrament. The ill.u.s.tration teaches that in order to be happy though married the principle of sacrifice must rule the conduct of the married. As no love between man and wife can be true which does not issue in a sacrifice of each for the other, so Christ gave Himself for His Church and the Church sacrifices itself to His service. The only true love is self-devotion, and the every-day affairs of married life must fail without this principle of self-sacrifice or the cross of Christ.
”Would to G.o.d that His dear Son were bidden to all weddings as to that of Cana! Truly then the wine of consolation and blessing would never be lacking. He who desires that the young of his flock should be like Jacob's, fair and ring-straked, must set fair objects before their eyes; and he who would find a blessing in his marriage, must ponder the holiness and dignity of this mystery, instead of which too often weddings become a season of mere feasting and disorder.”
A new home is being formed in reference to which the bride and groom should think, ”This is none other but the house of G.o.d, and this is the gate of heaven. As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” The parish church is called ”G.o.d's House;” but if all the paris.h.i.+oners rightly used their matrimony, every house in the parish might be called the same. Home is the place of the highest joys; religion should sanctify it. Home is the sphere of the deepest sorrows; the highest consolation of religion should a.s.suage its griefs. Home is the place of the greatest intimacy of heart with heart; religion should sweeten it with the joy of confidence. Home discovers all faults; religion should bless it with the abundance of charity. Home is the place for impressions, for instruction and culture; there should religion open her treasures of wisdom and p.r.o.nounce her heavenly benediction.
An old minister previous to the meeting of the General a.s.sembly of the Church of Scotland used to pray that the a.s.sembly might be so guided as ”_no to do ony harm_.” We have often thought that such a prayer as this would be an appropriate commencement for the marriage service.
Considering the issues that are involved in marriage--the misery unto the third and fourth generation that may result from it--those who join together man and woman in matrimony ought to pray that in doing so they may do no harm. Certainly the opening exhortation of the Church of England marriage service is sufficiently serious. It begins by proclaiming the sacredness of marriage as a Divine inst.i.tution; hallowed as a type of the mystical union between Christ and His Church; honoured (even in its festive aspect) by Our Lord's presence and first miracle at Cana of Galilee; declared to be ”honourable among all men; and therefore not by any to be enterprised, nor taken in hand, unadvisedly, lightly, or wantonly; but reverently, discreetly, advisedly, soberly, and in the fear of G.o.d; duly considering the causes for which Matrimony was ordained.” These are explained in words plain-spoken almost to coa.r.s.eness before allusion is made to the higher moral relation of ”mutual society, help, and comfort” which marriage creates.
Then follows ”the betrothal” in which the man ”plights his troth”
(pledges his truth), taking the initiative, while the woman gives hers in return: