Part 15 (1/2)
”That the goaded rage of the lower cla.s.ses found expression in nameless horrors is unfortunately a sorry truth. The proofs? We are not in a position to satisfy the desire for sensation with a cabinet of horrors.
The equipment of the German army does not include either the jars or the chemical fluids for preserving hacked-off limbs, hence it is impossible to display exhibits as in a museum. Our hospitals do not admit the dead.
”If Germany should be compelled to conduct a second campaign against the cultured peoples of Western Europe, then she will not forget to add the above articles to her equipment in any future war against such opponents. Pitying mother earth covers the murdered victims.”
This eloquent lawyer has overlooked the aid which the art of photography affords, and as the German army was well equipped with cameras, some tangible proofs could still have been procured--a.s.suming there were any shred of truth in Germany's accusations. The Berlin Government has circulated photographs of dum-dum bullets, _i.e.,_ English and French bullets with the points cut off. It is true no statement is offered regarding the time and place of the points being cut off, which leaves us free to believe that captured ammunition was ”doctored” in this manner by the Germans themselves. ”Necessity knows no law” is a principle capable of the widest application.
Gra.s.shoff's work was only published a few months ago, so that he had ample time to collect facts and proofs--the result is, six detailed cases with the names of his German informants and their regiments. In each case the ”evidence” is of an exceedingly doubtful character; in view of the gravity of the charges, the lack of corroboration (each case is ”proved” by one witness alone), and the partisans.h.i.+p of all concerned, we may safely conclude that no court of justice would convict on it.
The same criticism applies to the official White Book, published in June or July of the present year. Every witness had previously sworn an oath to protect the German flag (_der Fahneneid_) which precludes the probability of all impartiality in the witness and makes bias (_Befangenheit_) his simple duty. Another important factor to be borne in mind is the hysterical, morbid self-importance of the German nation in general, which causes police and members of the German army to shoot or cut down with the sword their own civilians for the most trivial offences, even in times of peace.
The White Book in question contains a six-page introduction stating the charges against Belgian civilians, and three hundred and seventeen pages of sworn evidence of German officers and soldiers taken for the most part in Belgium and France. A few extracts from the introduction will suffice to make the German side clear.
”Finally, there is not the slightest doubt that Belgian civilians robbed and killed German wounded; in short, mutilated them in a barbarous manner; even women and young girls partic.i.p.ated in these atrocities.
Hence German wounded have had their eyes gouged out, noses, ears, fingers and genitals cut off and their bodies cut open; in other cases German soldiers have been poisoned, hanged on trees, or had burning liquids poured on them, causing death in a most terrible form.
”This b.e.s.t.i.a.l behaviour on the part of the civilian population is a breach of Article I., Convention of Geneva,[120] and the principles of military law, as well as the principles of humanity” (p. 4).
[Footnote 120: Self-proclaimed outlaws cite the law when it suits their purpose!--Author.]
”The guilt for these transgressions of international law lies largely at the door of the Belgian Government. The latter has made an attempt to rid itself of responsibility by ascribing the guilt to the rage for destruction in the German troops, who are accused of proceeding to deeds of violence without any reason or ground.[121]
[Footnote 121: Certainly, just as in Germany in peace time.--Author.]
”An examining commission has been appointed by the Belgian Government to inquire into the alleged cruelties of German soldiers, and the evidence thus obtained has been made the subject of diplomatic complaints. This attempt to pervert the truth has absolutely failed.
”The German army is accustomed to wage war against hostile troops, but not against peaceful citizens.[122] Investigations conducted by any examining commission whatsoever, can never dispose of the irrefutable fact that German troops were forced by Belgium's native population to take defensive measures in the interests of self-preservation.
[Footnote 122: German non-commissioned officers are accustomed to kick and beat German privates, and the behaviour of German soldiers to fellow-subjects is aptly ill.u.s.trated by Lieutenant Forster fighting a pitched battle with a lame old cobbler in Zabern.--Author.]
”The refugees' tales collected by the Belgian commission and declared by them to be the result of an impartial investigation bear a stamp which makes them unworthy of belief. According to the nature of things, the commission is not in a position to test the veracity of such rumours or to apprehend the a.s.sociation of events. Hence, their accusations against the German army are nothing other than base slanders which are completely invalidated by the accompanying doc.u.ments” (pp. 5-6).
It must be a.s.sumed that readers are acquainted with the official publications of the Belgian and French Governments accusing the German army with waging war in an atrocious manner, as well as the report of Lord Bryce's commission and Professor Morgan's report in the ”Nineteenth Century” for June. In the above extract the Berlin Government rules them one and all out of court, which is the author's justification for making no use of their evidence.
Fortunately the Roman Catholic Church of Germany has published a refutation of Germany's White Book, and surely this authority deserves credence. The work in question bears the t.i.tle: ”Der Lugengeist im Volkerkrieg,” Kriegsmarchen gesammelt von Bernhard Duhr, S.J. (”The Spirit of Lying in the War of the Nations,” War Legends collected by the Rev. Bernhard Duhr, S.J.).[123] The reverend gentleman castigates all the nations at war with the same offence--lying. His work should have permanent value in the literature of war psychology, but he only undertakes to expose German lies, and in his 72-paged booklet he proves to the hilt the charges made in this work.
[Footnote 123: The author hopes to publish a complete translation shortly.]
In his introduction the Rev. Duhr states that the office of the Priests'
Society ”Pax” in Cologne has taken great pains to expose and refute lies as fast as they have appeared. The original doc.u.ments are preserved in the above office and may be seen by anyone who cares to apply.
Probably one of the motives actuating the Society ”Pax” and the Rev. B.
Duhr was the intention to refute the accusations of cruel outrages by Belgian and French Catholic priests. Whatever their motives may have been, one thing is certain, they have produced most convincing proof of German mendacity. It is to be hoped that the ”Pax” will give the world the benefit of all the doc.u.ments in their possession.
Even the Kaiser had the audacity to state in his telegram of September 8th, 1914, to President Wilson that ”women and priests have been guilty of atrocities in this guerilla warfare.” For reasons easy to understand the reverend gentleman does not introduce the Kaiser's name into his booklet, but in the introduction he remarks: ”Finally the refutation of such fairy-tales is a patriotic duty. Nothing is more essential for us Germans, especially in war time, than unity; but this harmony is necessarily endangered by religious bitterness and strife. Of a necessity it must cause deep pain and embitterment to our Catholic population when again and again ENTIRELY UNTRUE ACCUSATIONS are made against the priesthood of their Church.”
The Rev. Duhr's exposure of what he calls ”erlogener Schauergeschichten”
(”lying horror tales”) kills most of the ”fairy-tales” accusing the Russians, French and Belgians of atrocities on German soldiers. A few ill.u.s.trations will suffice to show the absence of all foundation for the charges against the Belgians; charges, we must remember, which the German soldiery believed, and which convinced them they were performing a holy task at Louvain, Tirlemont, Dinant, etc.
”On October 1st, 1914, a telegraphic agency (Wolff's?) issued the following notice: 'A high Bavarian officer writing from the front has informed the _Munchen-Augsburger Abendzeitung_ of this incident. South of Cambrai a column of German motor-cars was attacked by a company of French cyclists. For the most part the guard was killed by rifle fire, while the cars were all burnt. Later a German patrol discovered the remains, and on investigation, found that the dead Germans had all had their eyes gouged out.'”