Part 44 (1/2)
I looked up amazed, incredulous. I felt stunned for the moment, and said little. I then took the trouble to look over all the papers carefully.
There was a full set of faked observations. The examination took me an hour. During that time Dunkle and Loose were talking in a low tone. I did not hear what they said. I saw at once the game the rascals had been playing. The insinuation of their nefarious suggestion for the moment cleared my mind, and a dull anger filled me.
”Gentlemen,” I said, ”pack up every sc.r.a.p of this paper in that dress-suit case. Take all of your belongings and leave this hotel at once.”
I stood there while they did so. Not a word was spoken. Sheepish and silent, they shuffled from the room, ashamed and taken aback. Sick at heart at the thought that these men should have considered me unscrupulous enough to buy and use their faked figures, I went to my room. From that day--November 22--I have not received a letter or telegram from either.
Months later, in South America, I read with horrified amazement a summary of the account of this occurrence, sold by Dunkle and Loose to the New York _Times_. Distorted and twisted as it was I doubt if even the _Times_ would have used it had Dunkle and Loose not forced the lie that these faked figures were sent to Copenhagen. They knew, as G.o.d knows, that every sc.r.a.p of paper on which they wrote was packed in a suit-case as dirty as the intent of their sin-blotted paper.
If my report to the Copenhagen University proved anything, it was, by comparison, figure by figure, with the affidavits published, that in this at least I was guilty of no fraud.
In a re-examination later, a handwriting expert has come to the conclusion that the name of Loose was forged, and Loose was later put in jail for another offense. To the city editor of a New York evening paper Loose offered to sell a story retracting the charges published in the _Times_. Dunkle admitted to witnesses that he had been paid for the affidavit published in the New York _Times_. Loose, willing to discredit the _Times_ story, said, however, he ”wanted big money” for a retraction. One question that is forced in the interest of fair-play is, Why did the New York _Times_, without investigation, print a news item by which a man's honor is attacked, which is not only a perjury but a forgery? The managing editor was shown the evidence of this forgery, admitted its force, but not a word was printed to counteract the harm done by printing false news.
Captain E. B. Baldwin, a year later, discovered that this pro-Peary faked stuff was in possession of Professor James H. Gore, one of Mr.
Peary's friends in the National Geographic Society, which prost.i.tuted its name for Peary by pa.s.sing upon valueless ”proofs.” From the methods pursued by this society later, I am inclined to the belief that the Dunkle-Loose fake was concocted for members of this society. If not, how does it happen that Professor Gore is in possession of this faked, forged, and perjured stuff?
HOW A GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY PROSt.i.tUTED ITS NAME
x.x.xVI
THE WAs.h.i.+NGTON VERDICT--THE COPENHAGEN VERDICT
While one group of pro-Peary men were early engaged in various conspiracies, extending from New York to the Pacific coast, fabricating false charges, faking, and forging news items designed to injure me, men higher up in Was.h.i.+ngton were planning other deceptions behind closed doors. The Mt. McKinley bribery and the Dunkle-Loose humbug had the desired effect in reducing the opposition in Was.h.i.+ngton, and by December of 1909 the controversy was settled to Mr. Peary's satisfaction by a group of men who, by deception, betrayed public trust.
The National Geographic Society very early a.s.sumed a meddlesome air in an effort to dictate the distribution of Polar honors. With the excuse that they would give a gold medal to him who could prove priority to the claim of Polar discovery, they began a series of movements that would put a dishonorable political campaign to shame. In the light of later developments, medals from this society are regarded by true scientific workers as badges of dishonor. By way of explanation, one of the officers said that they made it a rule to examine all original field observations before the society honored an explorer. This was a deliberate falsehood, for no explorer going to Was.h.i.+ngton had previously packed his field papers and instruments for inspection. If so, then this society again convicts itself of a humbug, as it did later. Mr. Peary had been given a gold medal for his claim of having reached the farthest north in 1906. Peary admitted that his position rested on one imperfect observation. I happened, quite by accident, to be in a position, soon after Peary's return, to examine the instruments with which the farthest north observations had been made. Every apparatus was so bent and bruised that further observations were impossible. Of course Peary will say that the instruments were injured en route on the return. But this does not excuse the idle boast of the members of the National Geographic Society, who said that they always examined a returning explorer's field notes and apparatus, when in this case they did not see Mr. Peary's observations nor his instruments.
As a matter of fact, the National Geographic, like every other geographic society, had previously rated the merits of an explorer's work by his published reports. Their tactics were now changed to bring about a position where they might focus the controversy to Mr. Peary's and their advantage. There would have been no harm in this effort, if it had been honest; but, as we will see presently, falsehood and deception were evident in every move.
The position of the National Geographic Society is very generally misunderstood because of its pretentious use of the word ”National.” In reality, it is neither national nor geographic. It is a kind of self-admiration society, which serves the mission of a lecture bureau.
It has no connection with the Government and has no geographic authority save that which it a.s.sumes. As a lecture bureau it had retained Mr.
Peary to fill an important position as its princ.i.p.al star for many years. To keep him in the field as their head-line attraction they had paid $1,000 to Mr. Peary for the very venture now in question. This so-called ”National” Geographic Society was, therefore, a stock owner in the venture upon which they pa.s.sed as an unbiased jury.
Of course Mr. Peary consented to rest his case in their hands; but, for reasons above indicated and for others given below, I refused to have any dealings with such an unfair combination. The Government was appealed to, and every political and private wire was pulled to compel me to submit my case to a packed jury. During all the time when this was done, its moving spirits, Gilbert Grosvenor and Admiral Chester, were publicly and privately saying things about me and my attainment of the Pole that no gentleman would utter. That Mr. Peary was a member of this society; that his friends were absolute dictators of the power of appointment; that they were stock owners in Mr. Peary's enterprise--all of this, and a good many other facts, were carefully suppressed. To the public this society declared they were ”neutral, unbiased and scientific”--no more deliberate lie than which was ever forced upon the public.
Of course I refused to place my case in dishonest pro-Peary hands. With shameless audacity this society helped Mr. Peary carry along his press campaign by disseminating the cowardly slurs of Grosvenor, Chester, and others. They watched and encouraged the McKinley bribery; they closed their eyes to the Kennan lies. Through Chester and others, they faked pages of sensational pseudo-scientific news, all with the one centered aim of forcing doubt on opposing interests before the crucial moment, when, behind closed doors, the matter could be settled to their liking.
Thus, when Peary, his club, and his affiliated boosters at Was.h.i.+ngton were carrying their press slanders to a focus, there came a loud cry from the National Geographic Society for proofs.
With some wrangling, and a good deal of protest from half-hearted men, like Professor Moore, a jury was appointed to pa.s.s upon Mr. Peary's claims and mine. My claims were to be pa.s.sed upon against my will.
Unbiased and real Arctic explorers like General Greely and Admiral Schley were carefully excluded from this jury. Instead, armchair geographers, who were closely related to the Peary interests, were appointed as a ”neutral jury,” as follows:
_Henry Gannett_, a close personal friend of Mr. Peary.
_C. M. Chester_, related to Mr. Peary's fur trader, a member of a coterie that divided the profits of fleecing the Eskimos.
_O. H. t.i.ttman_, chief of a department under which part of Mr. Peary's work was done.
With a flourish of trumpets, including pages of self-boosting news distributed by Mr. Peary's press agents, this commission began its important investigation. At the time, it was said that all of Mr.
Peary's original field papers and instruments were under careful scrutiny. Later it was shown that one of the jury saw only COPIES. On November 4, 1909, was issued the verdict of this jury: ”That Commander Peary reached the North Pole on April 6, 1909.”